Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/502,465

APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING FORCE IN ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 06, 2023
Examiner
HOMZA, LISA NHUNG
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Thomas Alexander Johnson
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
675 granted / 780 resolved
+18.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+1.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
799
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
47.6%
+7.6% vs TC avg
§102
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§112
13.7%
-26.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 780 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicants’ election of Species 6, Figure 6, claims 14-17, 19, 22, 23, 25, 29, 31 in paper filed on 12/2/25 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not mention that the election with or without traverse, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.03(a)). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 14, 23, 25, 29 and 31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Rhyu Sehyun (WO 2013085231). Regarding claim 14, Sehyun discloses a device comprising: a permanent magnet (28) having a wedge-shaped body that tapers from a first end portion (b) having a first thickness to a second end portion (a) having a second thickness, wherein the first thickness (b) is greater than the second thickness (a); an armature (30) configured to move relative to the permanent magnet (28) and configured to, when energized, generate a magnetic field; wherein the wedge-shaped body of the permanent magnet (28) produces an asymmetrical magnetic flux density that increases toward the first end portion; and wherein the magnetic field of the armature (30), when the armature (30) is energized, interacts with the asymmetrical magnetic flux density to drive movement of the armature (30, see paragraph [47] – [49]). Regarding claim 23, Sehyun discloses: the armature (30) is configured to rotate about an axis, and the permanent magnet (22) is positioned such that the asymmetrical magnetic flux density interacts with the armature (30) during rotation. Regarding claim 25, Sehyun discloses: the first thickness is a greatest thickness of the permanent magnet (22) and the second thickness is a smallest thickness of the permanent magnet (22). PNG media_image1.png 282 468 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 29, Sehyun discloses: at least one permanent magnet (22) producing an asymmetrical magnetic flux density, the asymmetrical magnetic flux density having a peak flux density region displaced toward a first end portion of the at least one permanent magnet (22); and an armature (30) that is moveable relative to the at least one permanent magnet (22) and is configured to generate a magnetic field that interacts with the asymmetrical magnetic flux density to drive movement of the armature (30). Regarding claim 31, Sehyun discloses: the at least one permanent magnet (22) has a wedge-shaped body having a greatest thickness at the first end portion (see the drawing above) of the at least one permanent magnet (22) and a smallest thickness at a second, opposing end portion of the at least one permanent magnet (22). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 15-17, 19, 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rhyu Sehyun (WO 2013085231). Regarding claim 15, Sehyun teaches the claimed subject as disclosed above, however, fails to explicitly disclose the wedge-shaped body (28) comprises a continuously curved surface. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to form the wedge-shaped body (28) comprises a continuously curved surface for the purpose of suitability of the design choice, since it has been held that forming in one piece an article which has formerly been formed in two pieces and put together involves only routine skill in the art. Howard v. Detroit Stove Works, 150 U.S. 164 (1893). Furthermore, since such a modification would have involved a mere change in the shape of a component. A change in shape is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In re Dailey, 357 F.2d 669, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1966). Regarding claim 16, Sehyun discloses: wherein the permanent magnet (22) is a first permanent magnet and a second permanent magnet (see the drawing below); and wherein the second permanent magnet (see the drawing below) comprises a wedge-shaped body that tapers from a first end portion having a third thickness to a second end portion having a fourth thickness, wherein the third thickness is greater than the fourth thickness (see the drawing below). [AltContent: textbox (1st Permanent magnet)][AltContent: textbox (1st end portion of the 1st magnet)][AltContent: textbox (2nd end portion of the 1st magnet)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (2nd end portion 3rd thickness)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (1st end portion 4th thickness)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (2nd Permanent magnet)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image2.png 235 216 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 17, Sehyun discloses: wherein the first permanent magnet (see the drawing above) and the second permanent magnet (see the drawing above) are in an opposing orientation wherein the first end portion of the first permanent magnet (see the drawing above) is adjacent the second end portion of the second permanent magnet (see the drawing above) and the first end portion of the second permanent magnet is adjacent the second end portion of the first permanent magnet (see the drawing above). Regarding claim 19, Sehyun discloses: wherein the opposing orientation of the first permanent magnet and the second permanent magnet is configured to reduce magnetic flux leakage (see para. [0028] and [29]). Regarding claim 22, Sehyun teaches the claimed subject as disclosed above, however, fails to explicitly disclose the armature (30) comprises one of a ferromagnetic material, permanent magnet or a conductive material. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the armature (30) comprises one of a ferromagnetic material, permanent magnet, or a conductive material for the purpose of avoiding a short circuit. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication should be directed to Lisa Homza whose telephone number is (571) 272-3592. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Shawki Ismail can be reached on (571) 272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Lisa Nhung Homza/ Patent Examiner - Art Unit 2837 /SHAWKI S ISMAIL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 06, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 19, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 20, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 06, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597574
SPECIALLY PACKAGED RELAY AND PACKAGING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592353
RELAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12567549
CONTACTOR AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12537124
ELECTROMAGNETIC ACTUATING DEVICE AND CAMSHAFT ADJUSTER WITH AN ELECTROMAGNETIC ACTUATING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12537155
NON-POLARIZED SNAP-ON ELECTROMAGNETIC RELAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+1.1%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 780 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month