Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/502,619

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Nov 06, 2023
Examiner
HULBERT, AMANDA K
Art Unit
3792
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Texas System
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
626 granted / 743 resolved
+14.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
775
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
§103
39.3%
-0.7% vs TC avg
§102
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
§112
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 743 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 1-9 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Group 1, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on November 17, 2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 10-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 10, lines 6-9 recite the phrase “configured to receive the electrical signals and modulating an input/output (I/O) relationship between the biomarkers and electrical stimuli applied to a posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) of the brain by controlling the neurostimulator to stimulate the PCC based on the I/O relationship to achieve a desired level of the biomarkers.” This phrase is unclear, as the “biomarkers” that are included in the electrical signals are never determined or collected from the electrical signal. Therefore it is unclear how many biomarkers are determined and what the biomarkers are representing. Since the biomarkers are never determined, it is also unclear how the stimulation can be used to “achieve a desired level of the biomarkers.” Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 10-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Widge et al. (WO 2022/094123, which is reprinted as US 2024/0017069, which references are used her for clarity). Regarding claim 10, Widge discloses a system for deep brain stimulation, the system comprising: intracranial electrodes operable to be disposed in a hippocampus region of a brain and configured to record electrical signals that include biomarkers related to memory encoding (e.g. electrodes 106 that can be EEG electrodes as shown in Figure 2; [0057] and are used for receiving signals 122 in Figure 3 and can be placed in the hippocampus region of the brain as disclosed in [0066]); a neurostimulator configured to stimulate a posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) of the brain (e.g. target region that includes the cingulate cortex as disclosed in Claim 3); and a controller configured to receive the electrical signals and modulating an input/output (I/O) relationship between the biomarkers and electrical stimuli applied to a posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) of the brain by controlling the neurostimulator to stimulate the PCC based on the I/O relationship to achieve a desired level of the biomarkers (e.g. controller 114 of Figure 2 which takes data from the EEG electrodes in the hippocampus and uses it to stimulate the target region). Regarding claim 11, as best the claims can be understood, Widge additionally discloses wherein the electrical signals are acquired using intracranial electroencephalogram (iEEG) (e.g. internal EEG electrodes 106 as disclosed in [0066]). Regarding claim 12, as best the claims can be understood, Widge additionally discloses wherein the biomarkers include hippocampal theta and gamma oscillatory power (e.g. as disclosed in [0125]. Regarding claim 13, as best the claims can be understood, Widge additionally discloses wherein the intracranial electrodes record the electrical signals using a neural signal processor (NSP) (e.g. processor 108 as shown in Figure 2) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Amanda K Hulbert whose telephone number is (571)270-1912. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Unsu Jung can be reached at 571-272-8506. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Amanda K Hulbert/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3792
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 06, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 16, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12582832
DEVICE FOR APPLYING MEDICAL AND COSMETIC RADIATION TO A HUMAN BODY OR TO PARTS OF A HUMAN BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12572627
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCING ANOMALY DETECTION USING A PATTERN DICTIONARY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564718
MAGNETIC ELECTRODE COCHLEAR IMPLANT WITH IN-SITU STIMULATION ADJUSTMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12551700
ADJUSTABLE AURICULAR NERVE STIMULATION DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12544575
BIOELECTRIC NEUROMODULATION FOR HEMATOPOIESIS REGULATION DURING CHEMOTHERAPY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+3.7%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 743 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month