Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/503,725

CAMERA MODULE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 07, 2023
Examiner
PAN, JIA X
Art Unit
2871
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
429 granted / 595 resolved
+4.1% vs TC avg
Strong +38% interview lift
Without
With
+37.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
632
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
52.1%
+12.1% vs TC avg
§102
25.6%
-14.4% vs TC avg
§112
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 595 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-12, in the reply filed on 02/16/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 13-19 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Group, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 02/16/2026. Claim Objections Claims 1 and 6 objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1, last line, the phase “second ball member” should be “second ball group”; and Claim 6 should be depended on claim 5, because “a first magnet” and “a first coil” are cited in claim 5. Appropriate correction is required. Specification The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because last two lines, the phase “second ball member” should be “second ball group”. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: Last line of para.9, “second ball member” should be “second ball group”; Lines of para.138, “the third ball member B3 and the fourth ball member B4” should be “the third ball group B3 and the fourth ball group B4”; and Last line of para.157, “first ball member B1” should be “first ball group B1”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 8-10 and 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee US 2022/0187616. Regarding claim 1, Lee discloses a camera module, in at least figs.1 and 13-31, comprising: a lens unit (1000) comprising at least one lens; a first carrier (2000) configured to accommodate a portion of the lens unit and move in an optical axis direction (see fig.14 and para.241); a second carrier (3000) configured to accommodate the first carrier and move in a direction perpendicular to the optical axis (see fig.14 and para.243); and a connection substrate (8300) disposed to surround a side surface of the second carrier (see fig.14), wherein a first ball group (BG1) and a second ball group (BG2) spaced apart from each other in a direction perpendicular to the optical axis, are included between the first carrier and the second carrier (see fig.14), wherein the number of balls of the first ball group is greater than the number of balls of the second ball group (see fig.14), and wherein the connection substrate is disposed to surround the second carrier toward the second ball group (see fig.14). Regarding claim 8, Lee discloses the first carrier and the second carrier comprise a plurality of guide grooves on surfaces facing each other with the first ball group and the second ball group interposed therebetween (see fig.14), and wherein among the plurality of guide grooves, guide grooves facing each other with the second ball group interposed therebetween have different cross-sectional shapes (see figs.14, 23 and 29). Regarding claim 9, Lee discloses the lens unit comprises: a first lens unit (1130) coupled to the second carrier; and a second lens unit (1110) coupled to the first carrier and configured to move in the optical axis direction relative to the first lens unit (see figs.14 and 15). Regarding claim 10, Lee discloses the first lens unit further comprises a lens (L2) stage fixedly coupled to an upper surface of the second carrier (see figs.14 and 15). Regarding claim 12, Lee discloses a portable electronic device (see fig.1) comprising: the camera module of claim 1 (see rejection of claim 1); and an image sensor (S) configured to convert light passing through the at least one lens into an electrical signal (see fig.14). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee US 2022/0187616 as applied to claim 9 above, and further in view of Jeong US 2021/0048730. Regarding claim 11, Lee does not explicitly disclose a stopper disposed between the first lens unit and the second lens unit. Jeong discloses a camera module, in at least figs.1-3, a stopper (310) disposed on the lens holder to cover the upper surface of the carrier (para.133) for the purpose of preventing the lens module from being externally separated from the lens holder due to an external impact (para.134). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have a stopper disposed on the lens holder to cover the upper surface of the carrier as taught by Jeong in the camera module of Lee in order to have a stopper disposed between the first lens unit and the second lens unit because the second lens unit is buried in the carrier for the purpose of preventing the lens module from being externally separated from the lens holder due to an external impact. Claim(s) 1, 8-10 and 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Seo US 20220155652 in view of Lee US 2022/0187616. Regarding claim 1, Seo discloses a camera module, in at least figs.8-13, comprising: a lens unit (1510) comprising at least one lens; a first carrier (1300) configured to accommodate a portion of the lens unit and move in an optical axis direction (see fig.8 and para.72); a second carrier (1400) configured to move in a direction perpendicular to the optical axis (see fig.8 and para.97); and a connection substrate (1130) disposed to surround a side surface of the second carrier (see figs.8-10), wherein a first ball group (1475a with two balls) and a second ball group (1475a with one ball) spaced apart from each other in a direction perpendicular to the optical axis, are included between the first carrier and the second carrier (see figs.8-13), wherein the number of balls of the first ball group is greater than the number of balls of the second ball group (see figs.8-12), and wherein the connection substrate is disposed to surround the second carrier toward the second ball group (see figs.8 and 13). Seo does not explicitly disclose the second carrier configured to accommodate the first carrier. Lee discloses the second carrier (3000) configured to accommodate the first carrier (2000) for the purpose of accommodating the first carrier (see fig.14). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the second carrier configured to accommodate the first carrier as taught by Lee in the camera module of Seo for the purpose of accommodating the first carrier. Regarding claim 8, Seo discloses the first carrier and the second carrier comprise a plurality of guide grooves on surfaces facing each other with the first ball group and the second ball group interposed therebetween (see fig.8), and wherein among the plurality of guide grooves, guide grooves facing each other with the second ball group interposed therebetween have different cross-sectional shapes (see figs.8 and 12). Regarding claim 8, Lee discloses the first carrier and the second carrier comprise a plurality of guide grooves on surfaces facing each other with the first ball group and the second ball group interposed therebetween (see fig.14), and wherein among the plurality of guide grooves, guide grooves facing each other with the second ball group interposed therebetween have different cross-sectional shapes (see figs.14, 23 and 29) for the purpose of accommodating the first carrier (see fig.14). the reason for combining is the same as claim 1. Regarding claim 9, Seo discloses the lens unit comprises: a first lens unit (bottom lens unit or middle lens unit in 1510, para.55) coupled to the second carrier; and a second lens unit (upper lens unit in 1510, para.55) coupled to the first carrier and configured to move in the optical axis direction relative to the first lens unit (see fig.8). Regarding claim 10, Seo discloses the first lens unit further comprises a lens (para.54) stage fixedly coupled to an upper surface of the second carrier (see fig.8). Regarding claim 12, Seo in view Lee discloses a portable electronic device (see para.51) comprising: the camera module of claim 1 (see rejection of claim 1); and an image sensor (1151 or 1150) configured to convert light passing through the at least one lens into an electrical signal (see fig.8 and para.54). Claim(s) 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Seo US 20220155652 in view of Lee US 2022/0187616 as applied to claim 9 above, and further in view of Jeong US 2021/0048730. Regarding claim 11, Seo in view of Lee does not explicitly disclose a stopper disposed between the first lens unit and the second lens unit. Jeong discloses a camera module, in at least figs.1-3, a stopper (310) disposed on the lens holder to cover the upper surface of the carrier (para.133) for the purpose of preventing the lens module from being externally separated from the lens holder due to an external impact (para.134). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have a stopper disposed on the lens holder to cover the upper surface of the carrier as taught by Jeong in the camera module of Seo in view of Lee in order to have a stopper disposed between the first lens unit and the second lens unit because the second lens unit is buried in the carrier for the purpose of preventing the lens module from being externally separated from the lens holder due to an external impact. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 2, the prior art of record does not disclose or suggest the claim limitations of “further comprising: a housing configured to accommodate the second carrier, wherein the connection substrate comprises: a first substrate disposed in the second carrier; a connection portion disposed in the housing; and an extension portion connecting the first substrate and the connection portion, and having a curved shape at a portion thereof”, along with other claim limitations. Claims 3-7 are depended on claim 2, so they are allowable for the same reason. Seo US 20220155652, Lee US 2022/0187616 and Jeong US 2021/0048730, either singularly or in combination, does not disclose or suggest the claim limitations of “further comprising: a housing configured to accommodate the second carrier, wherein the connection substrate comprises: a first substrate disposed in the second carrier; a connection portion disposed in the housing; and an extension portion connecting the first substrate and the connection portion, and having a curved shape at a portion thereof”, along with other claim limitations. Claims 3-7 are depended on claim 2, so they are allowable for the same reason. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JIA X PAN whose telephone number is (571)270-7574. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 11:00AM - 5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael H Caley can be reached at (571)272-2286. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JIA X PAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 07, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601615
LIGHT RECEIVING ELEMENT, AND ROTATION DETECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596284
OPTICAL PATH CONTROL MEMBER AND DISPLAY DEVICE COMPRISING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585160
LIQUID-CRYSTALLINE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578506
OPTICAL FILM FOR THE REDUCTION OF OPTICAL ARTIFACTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578612
OPTICAL PATH CONTROL MEMBER AND DISPLAY DEVICE COMPRISING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+37.7%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 595 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month