Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/503,766

DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 07, 2023
Examiner
BUKHARI, SIBTE H
Art Unit
2449
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
336 granted / 428 resolved
+20.5% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+37.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
447
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
§103
61.9%
+21.9% vs TC avg
§102
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
§112
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 428 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This action is in response to application filed on 12/26/2025. Claims 12-18 have been examined and are pending with this action. Election/Restriction Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 12-18 in the reply filed on 12/26/2025 is acknowledged. Priority Examiner acknowledges that the Applicant claims a priority benefit of PCT/CN2022/091397 filed on 05/07/2022. Drawings The drawings were received on 11/07/2023 and these drawings are accepted. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 9/17/2024 & 12/2/2024 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Oath/Declaration Examiner Note: Oath is missing. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 12, 13, 15 & 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable of WU et al (US 2023/0179345) in view of Buthler et al (US 2023/0096912). As per claim 12, WU discloses a method (Wu: [ABS]: “a wireless communication method, a terminal device, and a network device”), comprising: receiving, by a first device, first information from a second device (WU: [0100]: “when a terminal device receives a first physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) transmitted by a network device by scheduling a first HARQ process”), wherein the first information indicates a plurality of first moments, the plurality of first moments are configured to be used by the first device to send second information to the second device (WU: [0100]: “the network device by scheduling the first HARQ process before a first moment; where the first moment is determined according to a second moment, and the second moment is a transmission end moment of sending first HARQ-ACK feedback information corresponding to the first PDSCH from the terminal device to the network device,”), decoding, by the first device, the first data information (WU: [0135]: “the first HARQ-ACK feedback information includes: an ACK, or, a NACK. For example, the first HARQ-ACK feedback information is ACK information or NACK information obtained by decoding the first PDSCH.”),; and sending, by the first device, the second information to the second device at a first feedback moment wherein the first feedback moment is comprised in the plurality of first moments (WU: [0010]: “where the first moment is a transmission end moment of receiving first hybrid automatic repeat request acknowledgement (HARQ-ACK) feedback information corresponding to the first PDSCH by the network device from the terminal device, or, the first moment is determined according to a second moment, where the second moment is a transmission end moment of sending the first PDSCH by the network device..”) WU does not explicitly teach the result of decoded data. Buthler however discloses the second information indicates a result of decoding first data information by the first device (Buthler: [0059]: “indicating the result of an attempt to decode the data and including range estimation information.”), Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of WU view of Buthler to figure out the result of decided data. One would be motivated to do so because this technique advantageously aids in range estimation. (Buthler). Claim 15 is rejected based on rationale provided for claim 12. As per claim 2, WU/Buthler discloses the method according to claim 12, wherein the first feedback moment is an earliest first moment in the plurality of first moments (WU: [0199]: “the network device no longer transmits a second PDSCH by scheduling the HARQ process x to the terminal device before the end moment of slot n+18 in the uplink slots of the network device, then the earliest slot at which the terminal device may receive again the second PDSCH transmitted by scheduling the HARQ process x i.”). that is after the first device completes decoding of the first data information (WU: [0135]: “the first HARQ-ACK feedback information includes: an ACK, or, a NACK. For example, the first HARQ-ACK feedback information is ACK information or NACK information obtained by decoding the first PDSCH.”). Claim 16 is rejected based on rationale provided for claim 13. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 14 & 17-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. This includes: Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Sibte Bukhari whose telephone number is (571) 270-7122. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 9:00 - 6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vivek Srivastava can be reached on (571) 272-7304. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SIBTE H BUKHARI/Examiner, Art Unit 2449
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 07, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598666
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CHO AND FAST MCG LINK RECOVERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592844
OPTIMIZATION OF LINK BANDWIDTH CONSUMPTION IN A LAYER-2 MULTICAST NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587306
DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS, CIRCUIT BOARD, STORAGE MEDIUM AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587415
LOCAL PORT GROUPING WITH RAILS OF NETWORK LINKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587499
HIGH-AVAILABILITY EGRESS ACCESS WITH CONSISTENT SOURCE IP ADDRESSES FOR WORKLOADS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+37.0%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 428 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month