Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/504,224

DATA INTERACTION METHOD, APPARATUS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Nov 08, 2023
Examiner
STIVALETTI, MATHEUS R
Art Unit
3623
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
BEIJING ZITIAO NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
OA Round
2 (Final)
38%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
72%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 38% of cases
38%
Career Allow Rate
85 granted / 223 resolved
-13.9% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+34.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
261
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
45.8%
+5.8% vs TC avg
§103
36.1%
-3.9% vs TC avg
§102
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
§112
8.7%
-31.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 223 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Detailed Action Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claim This action is in reply to the office action received on 23 of December 2025. Claims 1, 2, 10, 11, 19, and 20 have been amended. Claims 1-20 are currently pending and are allowed as described below. Allowable Subject Matter None of the cited art documented by the Examiner, taken individually or in combination, discloses or suggests the features in claims 1, 10, and 19 nor could a person skilled in the art easily conceive of such features even in the light of common technical knowledge at the time of filing. Most notably, “wherein the connector is configured to obtain the updated first transaction data during a first time period and obtain update information related to the updated first transaction data during a second time period, and perform data synchronization check based on the updated first transaction data and the update information, wherein the first time period is shorter than the second time period". Therefore, pending claims 1-20 are therefore distinguished from the prior arts cited by the Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 2, 11, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 2, 11, and 20 disclose “a long-connection communication channel with a local service end” rendering the claim indefinite since it is unclear whether the applicant is referring to the same long-connection channel and local service end or a second long-connection channel and local service end distinct from the long-connection channel and local service end already introduced into the claim language in Claims 1, 10, and 19. Dependent claims 3-9 and 12-18 do not cure this deficiency and are rejected for the same reasons as stated above with respect to claims 2, 11, and 20. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATHEUS R STIVALETTI whose telephone number is (571)272-5758. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 8:30-5:30. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rutao (Rob) Wu can be reached on (571)272-7761. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-1822. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /MATHEUS RIBEIRO STIVALETTI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3623 02/13/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Dec 23, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 17, 2026
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12579483
REAL-TIME PROBABILITY DETERMINED ITERATIVELY THROUGHOUT A PERIOD OF TIME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12555053
Virtual, Real-time, and Dynamic Availability Monitoring to Enable Multi-Channel Point-to-Point Communication
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12511595
CYBERSECURITY OPERATIONS CENTER LOAD BALANCING
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12505397
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING AND GOVERNANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent 12481942
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING REPRESENTATIVE MODELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
38%
Grant Probability
72%
With Interview (+34.4%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 223 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month