Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 18/504,291

Dendrite-Free, Wide Temperature Range Lithium Metal Batteries Enabled by Hybrid Network Ionic Liquids

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
Nov 08, 2023
Priority
May 01, 2020 — provisional 63/018,772 +1 more
Examiner
CULLEN, SEAN P
Art Unit
1725
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Drexel University
OA Round
2 (Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
861 granted / 1246 resolved
+4.1% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
1275
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
40.1%
+0.1% vs TC avg
§102
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§112
35.5%
-4.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1246 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims and Other Notes Claims 1–7 and 9–21 are pending. Claim 8 is canceled. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. The paragraph numbers cited in this Office Action in reference to the instant application are referring to the paragraph numbering of the PG-Pub of the instant application. See US 2024/0243356 A1. Specification Applicants' amendments have overcome the objections to the specification. Claim Objections Applicants' amendments have overcome the objections of claim 21. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Applicants' amendments have overcome the rejections of claims 1–7 and 9–20 under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph. Applicants' amendments have overcome the rejections of claims 1–7 and 9–20 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 1–7 and 9–21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Pan et al. (US 2018/0226679 A1, hereinafter Pan) in view of Li et al. (Study on properties of gel polymer electrolytes based on ionic liquid and amine-terminated butadiene-acrylonitrile copolymer chemically crosslinked by polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane, hereinafter Li) and Park et al. (Polymer electrolytes integrated with ionic liquids for further electrochemical devices, hereinafter Park). Regarding claims 1, 9–11, and 14, Pan discloses a lithium gel polymer electrolyte composition comprising a crosslinked network formed by a cross-linking reaction comprising reacting an inorganic polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane with either a functionalized poly(ethylene glycol), or a functionalized poly(ethylene oxide) (FIG. 1B, [0034]); and one or more lithium salts (FIG. 1B, [0034]), wherein the lithium salt is selected from the group consisting of a lithium salt with an anion of bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonamide, hexafluoroarsenate, hexafluorophosphate, perchlorate, tetrafluoroborate, tris(pentafluoroethyl)trifluorophosphate, trifluoromethanesulfonate, bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide, cyclo-difluoromethane-1,1-bis(sulfonyl)imide, cyclo-hexafluoropropane-1,1-bis(sulfonyl)imide, bis(perfluoroethanesulfonyl)imide, bis(oxalate)borate, difluoro(oxalato)borate, dicyanotriazolate, tetracyanoborate, dicyanotriazolate, dicyano-trifluoromethyl-imidazole, and dicyano-pentafluoroethyl-imidazole (FIG. 1B, [0034]). Pan does not explicitly disclose: an ionic liquid, wherein the ionic liquid is present in an amount of from about 1 wt. % to about 90 wt. %, based on a total weight of the lithium gel polymer electrolyte. wherein the lithium salt is present in an amount of from 50 wt. % to about 90 wt. %, based on a total weight of the lithium gel polymer electrolyte. Li discloses a lithium gel polymer electrolyte composition comprising a crosslinked network, an ionic liquid, and one or more lithium salts (FIG. 1, P274/C2/L1–17), wherein the ionic liquid is present in an amount of from about 1 wt. % to about 90 wt. %, based on a total weight of the lithium gel polymer electrolyte (FIG. 2, P274/C2/L1–17), and wherein the lithium salt is present in an amount of from 50 wt. % to about 90 wt. %, based on a total weight of the lithium gel polymer electrolyte (FIG. 2, P274/C2/L1–17) to improve the ionic conductivity (FIG. 2,P275/C1/L11–25). Pan and Li are analogous art because they are directed to lithium gel polymer electrolytes. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to make the lithium gel electrolyte composition of Pan with the ionic liquid of Li in order to improve the ionic conductivity. Modified Pan does not explicitly disclose: wherein an overall ionic conductivity is 1 mS·cm-1 or greater at 20° C. Park discloses a lithium gel polymer electrolyte composition having an overall ionic conductivity is 1 mS·cm-1 or greater at 20° C (FIG. 7, P2372/C2/L1–14) to improve the ionic conductivity and ion transference number (P2372/C2/L23–36). Pan and Park are analogous art because they are directed to lithium gel polymer electrolytes. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to make the lithium gel polymer electrolyte composition of modified Pan with the ionic liquid and ionic conductivity of Park in order to improve the ionic conductivity and ion transference number. Regarding claim 2, modified Pan discloses all claim limitations set forth above and further discloses a composition: wherein the polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane is reacted with the functionalized poly(ethylene glycol) (FIG. 1B, [0034]) and the functionalized poly(ethylene glycol) is an amine-terminated diterminal functionalized poly(ethylene glycol) (FIG. 1B, [0034]). Regarding claim 12, modified Pan discloses all claim limitations set forth above and further discloses a composition: wherein the amine-terminated poly(ethylene glycol), has a number average molecular weight of from about 2,000 g/mol to about 6,000 g/mol (FIG. 1B, [0034]). Regarding claim 3, modified Pan discloses all claim limitations set forth above and further discloses a composition: wherein the polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane is reacted with the functionalized poly(ethylene oxide) (FIG. 1B, [0034]) and the functionalized poly(ethylene oxide) is an amine-terminated diterminal functionalized (polyethylene oxide) (FIG. 1B, [0034]). Regarding claim 4, modified Pan discloses all claim limitations set forth above and further discloses a composition: wherein the inorganic polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane has a structure: PNG media_image1.png 200 400 media_image1.png Greyscale (FIG. 1B, [0034]) wherein each R group is independently selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, hydrocarbyl, reactive functional groups and functionalized hydrocarbyl groups (FIG. 1B, [0034]) and at least one of the R groups contains a functional group suitable for the cross-linking reaction (FIG. 1B, [0034]). Regarding claim 5, modified Pan discloses all claim limitations set forth above and further discloses a composition: wherein the inorganic polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane is selected from the group consisting of octakis(3-glycidyloxypropyldimethylsiloxy)octasilsesquioxane, epoxycyclohexylethyl polysilsesquioxane, glycidyl polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane, and octa epoxycyclohexyldimethylsilyl polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (FIG. 1B, [0034]). Regarding claim 6, modified Pan discloses all claim limitations set forth above and further discloses a composition: where the inorganic polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane is reacted with the functionalized poly(ethylene glycol) in a molar ratio of from about 1:100 to about 10:1 (FIG. 1C, [0020]). Regarding claim 7, modified Pan discloses all claim limitations set forth above and further discloses a composition: wherein the inorganic polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane is reacted with functionalized poly(ethylene glycol) in a molar ratio of from about 1:4 to about 1:2 (FIG. 1C, [0020]). Regarding claim 13, modified Pan discloses all claim limitations set forth above and further discloses a composition further comprising: a solvent is selected from the group consisting of tetrahydrofuran, diethyl ether, acetonitrile, ethyl acetate, and methyl acetate (FIG. 1B, [0020]). Regarding claim 15, Pan discloses a battery comprising a lithium gel polymer electrolyte and a metal anode (FIG. 4A, [0026]), wherein the lithium gel polymer electrolyte comprises: a crosslinked network formed by a cross-linking reaction comprising reacting an inorganic polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane with either a functionalized poly(ethylene glycol), or a functionalized poly(ethylene oxide) (FIG. 1B, [0034]); and one or more lithium salts (FIG. 1B, [0034]). Pan does not explicitly disclose: an ionic liquid. Li discloses a lithium gel polymer electrolyte composition comprising a crosslinked network, an ionic liquid, and one or more lithium salts to improve the ionic conductivity (FIG. 2,P275/C1/L11–25). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to make the lithium gel electrolyte composition of Pan with the ionic liquid of Li in order to improve the ionic conductivity. Modified Pan does not explicitly disclose: wherein the ionic liquid is selected from N-methyl-N-propylpyrrolidinium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate, and 1-butylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate. Park discloses a lithium gel polymer electrolyte composition comprising an ionic liquid is selected from N-methyl-N-propylpyrrolidinium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate, and 1-butylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate (FIG. 4, P2368/C2/L1–15) to improve the ionic conductivity and ion transference number (P2372/C2/L23–36). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to make the lithium gel polymer electrolyte composition of modified Pan with the ionic liquid and ionic conductivity of Park in order to improve the ionic conductivity and ion transference number. Regarding claim 16, modified Pan discloses all claim limitations set forth above and further discloses a lithium battery: wherein the battery delivers stable cycling performance over 6800 hours at a current density of 0.1 mA·cm-2 and a charge-discharge cycle takes a total of about 3 hours, or the battery delivers a stable cycling performance over at least 2250 charge-discharge steps, at a current density of 0.1 mA·cm-2 (FIG. 3B, [0024]), and wherein stable cycling performance means having a repeatable voltage profile with no insubstantial noise attributable to pulverization, delamination, corrosion, or other side reactions and one cycle equals 1 charge plus 1 discharge (FIG. 3B, [0024]). Regarding claim 17, modified Pan discloses all claim limitations set forth above and further discloses a lithium battery: wherein the metal anode is lithium (FIG. 4A, [0026]). Regarding claim 18, process of preparing a lithium gel polymer electrolyte comprising a crosslinked network formed by a cross-linking reaction comprising reacting an inorganic polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane with either a functionalized poly(ethylene glycol), or a functionalized poly(ethylene oxide) (FIG. 1B, [0034]); and one or more lithium salts (FIG. 1B, [0034]), wherein the process comprises: reacting the inorganic polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane with the functionalized poly(ethylene glycol) or the functionalized poly(ethylene oxide) to form the crosslinked network in a single-step polymerization process in the presence of one or more lithium salts (FIG. 1B, [0020]). Pan does not explicitly disclose: reacting the inorganic polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane to form the crosslinked network in a single-step polymerization process in the presence of an ionic liquid, and one or more lithium salts. Li discloses preparing a lithium gel polymer electrolyte by reacting the inorganic polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane to form the crosslinked network in a single-step polymerization process in the presence of an ionic liquid, and one or more lithium salts (FIG. 1, P274/C2/L1–17) to improve the ionic conductivity (FIG. 2,P275/C1/L11–25). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to make the lithium gel electrolyte composition of Pan with the ionic liquid of Li in order to improve the ionic conductivity. Modified Pan does not explicitly disclose: wherein the ionic liquid is selected from N-methyl-N-propylpyrrolidinium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate, and 1-butylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate. Park discloses a lithium gel polymer electrolyte composition comprising an ionic liquid is selected from N-methyl-N-propylpyrrolidinium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate, and 1-butylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate (FIG. 4, P2368/C2/L1–15) to improve the ionic conductivity and ion transference number (P2372/C2/L23–36). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to make the lithium gel polymer electrolyte composition of modified Pan with the ionic liquid and ionic conductivity of Park in order to improve the ionic conductivity and ion transference number. Regarding claim 19, modified Pan discloses all claim limitations set forth above and further discloses a process: wherein the polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane is reacted with the functionalized poly(ethylene glycol) (FIG. 1B, [0034]) and the functionalized poly(ethylene glycol) is an amine-terminated diterminal functionalized poly(ethylene glycol) (FIG. 1B, [0034]). Regarding claim 20, modified Pan discloses all claim limitations set forth above and further discloses a process: wherein the polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane is reacted with the functionalized poly(ethylene oxide) (FIG. 1B, [0034]) and the functionalized poly(ethylene oxide) is an amine-terminated diterminal functionalized (polyethylene oxide) (FIG. 1B, [0034]). Regarding claim 21, Pan discloses a lithium gel polymer electrolyte composition comprising a crosslinked network formed by a cross-linking reaction comprising reacting an inorganic polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane with either a functionalized poly(ethylene glycol), or a functionalized poly(ethylene oxide) (FIG. 1B, [0034]); and one or more lithium salts (FIG. 1B, [0034]). Pan does not explicitly disclose: an ionic liquid. Li discloses a lithium gel polymer electrolyte composition comprising a crosslinked network and an ionic liquid (FIG. 1, P274/C2/L1–17) to improve the ionic conductivity (FIG. 2,P275/C1/L11–25). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to make the lithium gel electrolyte composition of Pan with the ionic liquid of Li in order to improve the ionic conductivity. Modified Pan does not explicitly disclose: wherein the ionic liquid is selected from 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate, and 1-butylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate. Park discloses a lithium gel polymer electrolyte composition comprising an ionic liquid is selected from N-methyl-N-propylpyrrolidinium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate, and 1-butylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate (FIG. 4, P2368/C2/L1–15) to improve the ionic conductivity and ion transference number (P2372/C2/L23–36). Pan and Park are analogous art because they are directed to lithium gel polymer electrolytes. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to make the lithium gel polymer electrolyte composition of modified Pan with the ionic liquid and ionic conductivity of Park in order to improve the ionic conductivity and ion transference number. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 13 July 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicants argue the Office cannot rely on Li (Dendrite-free, wide temperature range lithium metal batteries enabled by hybrid network ionic liquids) to reject the present application (P3/¶2). The current 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of all claims uses Li (Study on properties of gel polymer electrolytes based on ionic liquid and amine-terminated butadiene-acrylonitrile copolymer chemically crosslinked by polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane). Li (Study on properties of gel polymer electrolytes based on ionic liquid and amine-terminated butadiene-acrylonitrile copolymer chemically crosslinked by polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane) was published on 30 March 2012. The publication date of Li (Study on properties of gel polymer electrolytes based on ionic liquid and amine-terminated butadiene-acrylonitrile copolymer chemically crosslinked by polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane) is prior to the filing date of U.S. provisional application 63/018,772. Therefore, the Office can rely on Li (Study on properties of gel polymer electrolytes based on ionic liquid and amine-terminated butadiene-acrylonitrile copolymer chemically crosslinked by polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane) to reject the present application. Applicants argue Park is non-analogous to Pan (P4/¶2). It has been held that a prior art reference must either be in the field of the inventor’s endeavor or, if not, then be reasonably pertinent to the particular problem with which the inventor was concerned, in order to be relied upon as a basis for rejection of the claimed invention. See In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 24 USPQ2d 1443 (Fed. Cir. 1992). In this case, the instant application, Pan (see abstract), and Park (see abstract) are directed to polymer electrolytes. Therefore, Park is analogous to Pan. Applicants argue a skilled person would not consult Pan in relation to the present invention since it relates to a different type of electrolyte nor would a skilled person combine Pan with Park et al. since they relate to different types of electrolytes (P4/¶2). It has been held that a prior art reference must either be in the field of the inventor's endeavor or, if not, then be reasonably pertinent to the particular problem with which the inventor was concerned, in order to be relied upon as a basis for rejection of the claimed invention. See In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 24 USPQ2d 1443 (Fed. Cir. 1992). In this case, the instant application, Pan (see abstract), and Park (see abstract) are directed to polymer electrolytes. Therefore, a skilled person would consult Pan in relation to the present invention since it relates to polymer electrolytes and combine Pan with Park since they relate to polymer electrolytes. Applicants argue a skilled person would not add an ionic liquid to the solid polymer electrolyte of Pan since solid polymer electrolytes do not contain any liquid components (P4/¶4). It is noted that "the arguments of counsel cannot take the place of evidence in the record", In re Schulze, 346 F.2d 600, 602, 145 USPQ 716, 718 (CCPA 1965). It is the examiner’s position that the arguments provided by the applicant regarding solid polymer electrolytes do not contain any liquid components must be supported by a declaration or affidavit. As set forth in MPEP 716.02(g), "the reason for requiring evidence in a declaration or affidavit form is to obtain the assurances that any statements or representations made are correct, as provided by 35 U.S.C. 24 and 18 U.S.C. 1001." Pan discloses liquids are used in the manufacture of the polymer electrolyte (see THF, [0041]). Therefore, Pan does not disclose the solid polymer electrolytes does not contain any liquid component. Applicants argue the Office does not rely on Park as disclosing that "the lithium salt is present in an amount of from 50 wt% to about 90 wt%, based on a total weight of the lithium gel polymer electrolyte" a feature that the Office has conceded is missing from Pan (P4/¶5). Li discloses a lithium gel polymer electrolyte composition comprising a crosslinked network, an ionic liquid, and one or more lithium salts (FIG. 1, P274/C2/L1–17), wherein the ionic liquid is present in an amount of from about 1 wt. % to about 90 wt. %, based on a total weight of the lithium gel polymer electrolyte (FIG. 2, P274/C2/L1–17), and wherein the lithium salt is present in an amount of from 50 wt. % to about 90 wt. %, based on a total weight of the lithium gel polymer electrolyte (FIG. 2, P274/C2/L1–17) to improve the ionic conductivity (FIG. 2,P275/C1/L11–25). Therefore, the combination of references disclose "the lithium salt is present in an amount of from 50 wt% to about 90 wt%, based on a total weight of the lithium gel polymer electrolyte." Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Long (Polymer electrolytes for lithium polymer batteries) discloses gel polymer electrolytes and solid polymer electrolytes are both considered polymer electrolytes in the field of lithium polymer batteries (abstract). Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Sean P Cullen, Ph.D. whose telephone number is (571)270-1251. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Thursday 6:00 am to 4:00 pm CT, Friday 6:00 am to 12:00 pm CT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Basia A Ridley can be reached at (571)272-1453. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Sean P Cullen, Ph.D./Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Mar 24, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 13, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706323
LITHIUM-ION SOLID STATE CONDUCTOR, ELECTRODE AND BATTERY INCLUDING THE CONDUCTOR, METHODS OF MANUFACTURE THEREOF
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706350
COMPOSITE SEPARATOR, LITHIUM BATTERY INCLUDING THE SAME, AND METHOD OF PREPARING THE COMPOSITE SEPARATOR
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12695164
TRACTION BATTERY PACK TAB TERMINAL SECURING SYSTEM AND SECURING METHOD
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12683243
SEPARATOR FOR SECONDARY BATTERIES WITH IMPROVED ADHESIVE FORCE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12646799
BATTERY SEPARATOR INCLUDING ZEOLITE COATING POSITIONED WITHIN INTER-PARTICLE PORES OF SUBSTRATE, LITHIUM-ION BATTERY, AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+28.2%)
3y 2m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1246 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month