Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/504,390

AUTOMATIC POST-PRODUCTION FOR PRODUCT VIDEOS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 08, 2023
Examiner
CHOWDHURY, SUMAIYA A
Art Unit
2421
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Jbf Interlude 2009 Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
305 granted / 438 resolved
+11.6% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
451
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
89.4%
+49.4% vs TC avg
§102
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
§112
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 438 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-28 have been considered but are moot in view of new grounds of rejection. Examiner has brought in Stern (11,683,290) to disclose the newly amended feature. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-28 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rav-Acha (2021/0117471) in view of Stern (11,683,290). As for claims 1 and 15, Rav-Acha discloses a method for providing automatic editing of a product video, the method comprising: receiving product video footage (raw video) associated with a product ([0080], [0081], [0096], [0215]); generating a feature list including a plurality of product features (“meaningful parts of the product”: [0259], [0081], [0255], [0256], [0288]); assigning different portions of the product video footage to each feature of the plurality of product features ([0256], [0258]); creating a plurality of product artifacts from the portions of the product video footage assigned to each of the plurality of product features ([0257]-[0265]); storing the plurality of product artifacts in at least one database ([0260]-[0265]); However, Rav-Acha fails to disclose: receiving a deliverable requirement list indicating at least two different types of media deliverables to generate for the product and at least one product feature; retrieving, from the at least one database, at least one product artifact of the plurality of product artifacts associated with the at least one product feature; generating the media deliverables using the at least one retrieved product artifact in accordance with the deliverable requirement list; In an analogous art, Stern discloses: receiving a deliverable requirement list indicating at least two different types of media deliverables (“prompts the user for specific requirements of the deliverables”; col. 10, lines 13-50) to generate for the product and at least one product feature (col. 7, lines 12-43); retrieving, from the at least one database, at least one product artifact of the plurality of product artifacts associated with the at least one product feature (col. 3, line 20-col. 4, line 30, col. 10, lines 13-67); generating the media deliverables using the at least one retrieved product artifact in accordance with the deliverable requirement list (Deliverables are generated based on the deliverable requirement list; col. 10, lines 13-50); It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Rav-Acha’s invention to include the abovementioned limitation, as taught by Stern, for the advantage of automating the process of creating customized advertisements or promotional videos from content and instructions provided. As for claims 2 and 16, Rav-Acha discloses wherein generating the feature list includes receiving product metadata corresponding to the plurality of product features and generating the feature list based on the product metadata ([0081], [0255], [0256], [0259], [0288]). As for claims 3 and 17, Rav-Acha discloses wherein generating the feature list includes analyzing the product video footage to derive product metadata corresponding to the plurality of product features and generating the feature list based on the product metadata ([0081], [0255], [0256], [0259], [0288]). As for claims 4 and 18, Rav-Acha discloses wherein assigning different portions of the product video footage to each product feature of the plurality of product features includes assigning at least one timecode of the product video footage to each product feature of the plurality of product features ([0256]). As for claims 5 and 19, Rav-Acha discloses wherein assigning different portions of the product video footage to each product feature of the plurality of product features includes assigning at least one video coordinate of the product video footage to each product feature of the plurality of product features ([0120], [0244], [0261], [0262], [0279], [0257]). As for claims 6 and 20, Rav-Acha discloses wherein the at least one video coordinate indicates a region of the product video footage where the corresponding product feature is displayed ([0120], [0244], [0261], [0262], [0279], [0257]). As for claims 7 and 21, Rav-Acha discloses further comprising: assigning dimensions of a box to the at least one video coordinate ([0120], [0133]). As for claims 8 and 22, Rav-Acha discloses wherein the box encompasses a region of the product video footage where the corresponding product feature is displayed ([0120], [0133]). As for claims 9 and 23, Rav-Acha discloses wherein generating a media deliverable using the plurality of product artifacts based on the deliverable requirement list includes integrating at least one infographic with at least one product artifact ([0261], [0279]). Stern discloses generating the media deliverables (col. 10, lines 13-50). As for claims 10 and 24, Rav-Acha discloses wherein generating a media deliverable using the plurality of product artifacts based on the deliverable requirement list includes integrating at least one interactive element with at least one product artifact (“clickable link”; [0305]). Stern discloses generating the media deliverables (col. 10, lines 13-50). As for claims 11 and 25, Rav-Acha discloses wherein at least one of the media deliverable includes at least one image (The videos that are created include images [0013], [0080]-[0082]). As for claims 12 and 26, Stern discloses wherein at least one of the media deliverables includes at least one video (col. 10, lines 13-35). As for claims 13 and 27, Rav-Acha discloses wherein at least one media deliverable includes at least one interactive video (“clickable link”; [0305]). Stern discloses at least one of the media deliverables (col. 10, lines 13-35). As for claims 14 and 28, Rav-Acha discloses wherein at least one media deliverable includes two or more product artifacts from the plurality of product artifacts arranged in a sequence (fig. 3; [0106], [0254]). Stern discloses at least one of the media deliverables (col. 10, lines 13-35). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SUMAIYA A CHOWDHURY whose telephone number is (571)272-8567. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00-3:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NATHAN FLYNN can be reached at (571)272-1915. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. SUMAIYA A. CHOWDHURY Examiner Art Unit 2421 /SUMAIYA A CHOWDHURY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2421
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Jan 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 16, 2025
Response Filed
May 01, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Oct 24, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 03, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 30, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12621535
BULLET-SCREEN COMMENT PROCESSING METHOD AND SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12621525
GESTURE-BASED PARENTAL CONTROL SYSTEM
1y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12621072
MEDIA IDENTIFICATION USING WATERMARKS AND SIGNATURES
1y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12621541
Generating a Collaborative Interleaved Content Series
10m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12610097
AFFINITY PROFILE SYSTEM AND METHOD
3y 0m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+28.4%)
3y 1m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 438 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month