Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/504,633

High Conductive Busbars with Ultra-Conducting Composite of Carbon Nano-Tubes for Electric Machines

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 08, 2023
Examiner
PHAM, LEDA T
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
GM Global Technology Operations LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
729 granted / 981 resolved
+6.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1017
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
50.2%
+10.2% vs TC avg
§102
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
§112
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 981 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDSs) submitted on 11/8/23, 6/6/24, 8/8/25 are being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claim 14 is objected to because of the following informalities: “from the group” in lines 6-7 should be change to –from a group--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-9, 17-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Holesinger (US 2016/0118157 A1). Regarding claim 1, Holesinger teaches a composite conductor for a vehicle, comprising: a composite conductor (wire) including a surface (para [0071]), wherein the composite conductor is electrically conductive exhibiting an electrical conductivity of 1.0×10^7 Siemens per meter (S/m) or greater; and a first copper tape laminated to the surface (para [0075]), wherein the first copper tape includes a layer of carbon nanotubes sandwiched between a first copper layer and a second copper layer (para [0077]). Regarding claim 2, Holesinger teaches the first copper layer comprises a copper foil and the second copper layer comprises a copper coating (para [0077]). Regarding claim 3, Holesinger teaches the first copper tape exhibits a thickness in the range of 10 micrometers to 40 micrometers (para [0074]). Regarding claim 4, Holesinger teaches the carbon nanotube layer exhibits a thickness in the range of 2 nanometers to 50 nanometers, including all values and ranges therein, the copper coating layers exhibits a thickness in the range of 0.1 to 3 micrometers (para [0074]). Regarding claim 5, Holesinger teaches the composite conductor is formed from one or more of the following materials selected from the group consisting of copper, aluminum, and iron (para [0071]). Regarding claim 6, Holesinger teaches at least one additional carbon nanotube layer disposed on the second copper layer and at least one additional second copper layer disposed on the at least one additional carbon nanotube layer (para 0075]). Regarding claim 7, Holesinger teaches at least one additional copper tape is bonded to the first copper tape bonded to the surface (para [0075]). Regarding claim 8, Holesinger teaches no intermetallic phases are formed at the surface (para [0071]-[0073]). Regarding claim 9, Holesinger teaches a plurality of composite conductors are sintered together (para [0071]). Regarding claim 17, Holesinger teaches a method of forming a composite busbar for a vehicle, comprising: heating a busbar (wire) and a first copper tape (CNT-Cu), wherein the first copper tape includes a layer of carbon nanotubes sandwiched between a first copper layer and a second copper layer (para [0071]); laminating the first copper tape to the busbar by applying a force to the busbar and the first copper tape and bonding the first copper tape to a surface of the busbar (para [0075]); and heat treating the busbar and first copper tape (para [0086]). Regarding claim 18, Holesinger teaches laminating includes thermal rolling of the first copper tape to the surface, wherein the first copper tape exhibits a first length before drawing and a second length in the range of 100 percent to less than 105 percent of the first length (para 0074]). Regarding claim 19, Holesinger teaches laminating includes extrusion onto the first copper tape, wherein the first copper tape exhibits a first length before drawing and a second length in the range of 100 percent to less than 105 percent of the first length (para [0074]). Regarding claim 20, Holesinger teaches laminating includes hot-isostatic-pressing of the first copper tape to the surface of the busbar (para [0085]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 10-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Holesinger in view of Gopalakrishnan et al. (US 2023/0208237 A1). Regarding claim 10, Holesinger teaches the claimed invention as set forth in claim 1, except for the added limitation of the composite conductor is in the form of a busbar. Gopalakrishnan teaches a stator of an electric machine having composite conductor is in form of a busbar (8a-8c) to avoid a short-circuit and to securely arrange the terminal connection in a motor (para [0017]). Thus, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Holesinger’s conductor with the composite conductor is in the form of a busbar as taught by Gopalakrishnan. Doing so would avoid a short-circuit and to securely arrange the terminal connection in a motor (para [0017]). Regarding claim 11, Holesinger in view of Gopalakrishnan teaches the claimed invention as set forth in claim 10, except for the added limitation of the busbar is affixed to a plurality of windings of a stator. Gopalakrishnan further teaches a stator of an electric machine having busbar (8a-8c) is affixed to a plurality of windings (13) of a stator (3) to avoid a short-circuit and to securely arrange the terminal connection in a motor (para [0017]). Thus, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Holesinger in view of Gopalakrishnan’s conductor with the busbar is affixed to a plurality of windings of a stator as further taught by Gopalakrishnan. Doing so would avoid a short-circuit and to securely arrange the terminal connection in a motor (para [0017]). Regarding claim 12, Holesinger in view of Gopalakrishnan teaches the claimed invention as set forth in claim 11, except for the added limitation of a rotor is rotatably held in the stator. Gopalakrishnan further teaches a stator of an electric machine having a rotor (4) is rotatably held in the stator (3) to provide an electric drive for a vehicle. Thus, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Holesinger in view of Gopalakrishnan’s conductor with a rotor is rotatably held in the stator as further taught by Gopalakrishnan. Doing so would provide an electric drive for a vehicle. Regarding claim 13, Holesinger in view of Gopalakrishnan teaches the claimed invention as set forth in claim 12, except for the added limitation of the busbar is affixed to an inverter. Gopalakrishnan further teaches a stator of an electric machine having the busbar (8a-8c) is affixed to an inverter (6) to provide an electric drive for a vehicle. Thus, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Holesinger in view of Gopalakrishnan’s conductor with the busbar is affixed to an inverter as further taught by Gopalakrishnan. Doing so would provide an electric drive for a vehicle. Regarding claim 14, Holesinger teaches a propulsion system for a vehicle, comprising: a composite busbar including a busbar including a surface busbar formed of at least one material selected from the group consisting of copper, aluminum, and iron (para [0071]); and a first copper tape laminated to the surface, wherein the first copper tape includes a layer of carbon nanotubes sandwiched between a first copper foil layer and a second copper coating layer, and wherein the first copper tape exhibits a thickness in the range of 10 micrometers to 40 micrometers, and wherein the carbon nanotube layer exhibits a thickness in the range of 2 nanometers to 50 nanometers and the copper coating layers exhibits a thickness in the range of 0.1 to 3 micrometers (para [0075]-[0077]). However, Holesinger does not teach an electric motor, the electric motor including a stator including a plurality of windings, a rotor arranged within the stator, a composite busbar connected to the plurality of windings. Gopalakrishnan teaches an electric machine having a stator (3) including a plurality of windings (13), a rotor (4) arranged within the stator (3), a composite busbar (8a-8c) connected to the plurality of windings (13) to provide an electric drive for a vehicle. Thus, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Holesinger’s vehicle with an electric motor, the electric motor including a stator including a plurality of windings, a rotor arranged within the stator, a composite busbar connected to the plurality of windings as taught by Gopalakrishnan. Doing so would provide an electric drive for a vehicle. Regarding claim 15, Holesinger in view of Gopalakrishnan teaches the claimed invention as set forth in claim 14, Holesinger further teaches at least one additional carbon nanotube layer disposed on the second copper layer and at least one additional second copper layer disposed on the at least one additional carbon nanotube layer (para [0077]). Regarding claim 16, Holesinger in view of Gopalakrishnan teaches the claimed invention as set forth in claim 14, Holesinger further teaches at least one additional copper tape is laminated to the first copper tape bonded to the surface (para [0077]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Adriaenssens (US 8,853,540 B2) teaches a conductor for a communications cable includes an elongated metal wire and a metal sheet that includes a plurality of carbon nanotubes that at least partially surrounds the elongated metal wire. The metal wire may include copper, and the metal sheet may likewise include copper and may be welded to an outside surface of the metal wire to surround the metal wire. This conductor may be used in a variety of communications cables that carry high frequency signals. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LEDA T PHAM whose telephone number is (571)272-5806. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher M Koehler can be reached at (571) 272-3560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LEDA T PHAM/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 23, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 02, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 02, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603535
FLUID DRIVING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603534
ELECTRIC MACHINE INCLUDING FIELD COIL SEPARATORS HAVING AN INTEGRATED COOLANT FLOW PATH
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603554
Systems, Assemblies, and Methods Associated with a Replaceable Motor Controller
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597822
STATOR ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587053
Stator For Electric Machine and Method of Manufacturing Said Stator
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+11.4%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 981 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month