Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/504,694

POWER STORAGE CELL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 08, 2023
Priority
Nov 11, 2022 — JP 2022-180867
Examiner
CORNO JR, JAMES ANTHONY JOHN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
37%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 37% of cases
37%
Career Allowance Rate
52 granted / 141 resolved
-23.1% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+37.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
184
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
95.2%
+55.2% vs TC avg
§102
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§112
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 141 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 and 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kawate (US 2019/0044121 A1) in view of Kim et al. (US 2014/0186670 A1). Regarding claim 1, Kawate discloses a battery (i.e. power storage cell) comprising a wound electrode body (400) with a plurality of positive (410) and negative (420) electrode tabs protruding upward; a cell case (100) accommodating the electrode assembly; and an insulating member (sheet 350 and buffer 600) between the assembly and the case; wherein the case includes a case main body (111) with an opening (112) that opens upwards and a lid (110) that closes that opening, and the insulating member has a covering portion (600) that covers the upper surface of the electrode assembly (Kawate Figs. 1 and 2, and [0045]-[0054]). Kawate does not teach that the covering portion has a holding portion that holds an electrolyte solution leaked from the electrode assembly. Kim is directed to an improved insulator for jelly-roll batteries (Kim Abstract). Kim teaches that replacing the typical insulator plate of a jelly-roll battery with a plurality of fine pores to allow permeation of the electrolyte improves injectability without allowing penetration of foreign materials (Kim [0015]-[0016]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant invention to use the porous insulator of Kim for the buffer of Kawate to improve injectability. As the pores are permeable to the electrolyte, they will necessarily hold electrolyte that leaks from the assembly and therefore constitute holding portions. Regarding claim 2, modified Kawate teaches that a checker pattern of protrusions (i.e. a lattice structure) improves mechanical strength (Kim [0030] and Fig. 4). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant invention to use a lattice structure to improve mechanical strength. As the pores are fine and permeable to the electrolyte (Kim Abstract), they will necessarily hold the electrolyte by capillary action. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Guen (US 2020/0091484 A1) discloses an insulating member for a battery comprising lattice-shaped perforations (Guen Fig. 5A). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES A CORNO JR whose telephone number is (571)270-0745. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Niki Bakhtiari can be reached at (571) 272-3433. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.A.C/ Examiner, Art Unit 1722 /NIKI BAKHTIARI/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1722
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640394
POLYOXYMETHYLENE-BASED ALL-SOLID-STATE POLYMER ELECTROLYTE PREPARED BY IN-SITU RING-OPENING POLYMERIZATION AND APPLICATION
3y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640361
ELECTRODE ASSEMBLY AND RECHARGEABLE BATTERY INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12614763
POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, ALKALINE SECONDARY BATTERY
3y 6m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12609361
POWER STORAGE ELEMENT AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
3y 9m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12519134
Electrolyte Solution Additive for Lithium Secondary Battery, and Non-Aqueous Electrolyte Solution and Lithium Secondary Battery Which Include the Same
3y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
37%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+37.2%)
3y 2m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 141 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month