Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 18/505,396

METHODS OF TREATING MELANOMA WITH RIPRETINIB

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 09, 2023
Priority
May 12, 2021 — provisional 63/187,903 +3 more
Examiner
LEE, ANDREW P
Art Unit
1691
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Deciphera Pharmaceuticals LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
72%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allowance Rate
284 granted / 587 resolved
-11.6% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
639
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
57.4%
+17.4% vs TC avg
§102
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
§112
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 587 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Application Claims 1-29 are pending Claims 1-29 are under consideration in the instant office action. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 03/20/2024 complies with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97, 1.98 and MPEP § 609. Accordingly, it has been placed in the application file and the information therein has been considered as to the merits. See attached copy of the PTO-1449. Priority This application claims benefit of U.S. Application No. 63/187,903 filed on 05/12/2021, U.S. Application No. 63/231,384 filed on 08/10/2021, U.S. Application No. 63/313,570 filed on 02/24/2022, and PCT Application No. PCT/US2022/028456 filed on 05/10/2022. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Flynn et al. (WO 2019/152711, as disclosed in IDS). Flynn et al. teaches the use of l-[4-bromo-5-[l-ethyl-7-(methylamino)-2- oxo-l,2-dihydro-l,6-naphthyridin-3-yl]-2-fluorophenyl]-3-phenylurea (ripretinib) in combination with a MAPKAP kinase inhibitor for the treatment of cancers, including c-KIT-mediated cancers, such as melanoma (see abstract; paragraphs 0009-0012). Flynn et al. teaches a typical daily dosage of ripretinib in a range of from about 5 mg per day to about 5000 mg per day, and particularly 150 mg per day, which can be divided into 1-4 doses (paragraph 000176). Flynn et al. teaches treatment of cancers resistant to imatinib, sunitib, or regorafenib (paragraphs 0007; 000115). Regarding claims 18-19 and 25-26, Flynn et al. teaches “The c-KIT mutation can be a primary mutation in exon 9, exon 11, exon 13, or exon 17 of the c-KIT gene… In some embodiments, the secondary resistance mutation is in exon 13, exon 14, exon 17, or exon 18 of the c-KIT gene.” (paragraphs 000114). Flynn et al. teaches “Eradication of an existing c-KIT-mediated tumor, e.g., a c-KIT-mediated GIST, is defined as a "complete cytocidal cell killing" of a tumor to the limit of detection as determined by 5X objective microscopy for in vitro evaluations, or as defined as a complete response as determined by RECIST 1.1” (paragraph 000107). Therefore, the reference is deemed to anticipate the instant claims above. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 27-29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Flynn et al. (WO 2019/152711, as disclosed in IDS) as applied to claims 1-26 above, and further in view of Pham et al. (KIT and Melanoma: Biological Insights and Clinical Implications, Yonsei Medical Journal, 2020, 61(7), pp. 265-571). The teachings of Flynn et al. are presented above. Flynn et al. does not teach wherein the melanoma is cutaneous or noncutaneous melanoma. Pham et al. is drawn towards KIT mutations in melanoma (see abstract). Pham et al. teaches KIT mutations in a number of melanomas, including mucosal and desmoplastic melanomas (see Table 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to treat melanomas wherein the melanoma is cutaneous or noncutaneous melanoma, as suggested by Pham et al., and produce the instant invention. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to do so since Flynn et al. teaches ripretinib effective in treating KIT mutations in melanoma (see abstract), which can be found in mucosal and desmoplastic melanomas as taught by Pham et al. (Table 1 ), with a reasonable expectation of success absent evidence of criticality of the particular steps. Conclusion Claims 1-29 are rejected. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW P LEE whose telephone number is (571)270-1016. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Claytor can be reached at (571)272-8394. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW P LEE/Examiner, Art Unit 1691 /RENEE CLAYTOR/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1691
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 09, 2023
Application Filed
May 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12692231
TRYPTAMINE DERIVATIVES
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12685731
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
5y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12655142
4-(IMIDAZO[1,2-A]PYRIDIN-3-YL)-PYRIMIDINE DERIVATIVES
4y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12642856
DEGRADERS OF HEPATITIS C VIRUS NS3/4A PROTEIN
5y 2m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12642795
MRGPRX2 ANTAGONIST FOR THE TREATMENT OF PSEUDO ALLERGIC REACTIONS
5y 0m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
72%
With Interview (+23.3%)
3y 3m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 587 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month