Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/506,118

EARPHONE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Nov 09, 2023
Priority
Jul 29, 2020 — CN 202010743396.4 +4 more
Examiner
DABNEY, PHYLESHA LARVINIA
Art Unit
2694
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Shenzhen Shokz Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
615 granted / 804 resolved
+14.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
818
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
41.6%
+1.6% vs TC avg
§102
35.8%
-4.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 804 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – Claim(s) 1-3, 8, 11-13, 15, 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) as being anticipated by Struzik et al (US Patent No. 10951970). Regarding claim 1, Struzik teaches an earphone, comprising: a hook-shaped component (18, body), a connecting component (20, body portion), and a holding component (12 acoustic module), wherein when the earphone is in a wearing state, the hook-shaped component (18) is configured to hang between a rear side of an ear of a user and a head of the user, the holding component (12) is configured to contact a front side of the ear, wherein the holding component has a thickness direction, a length direction, and a height direction orthogonal to each other, the thickness direction is configured as a direction in which the holding component (12) is close to or away from the ear in the wearing state (fig. 1, off ear audio device), and the height direction is configured as a direction in which the holding component is close to or away from a top of the user's head in the wearing state, and the connecting component (20) is configured to connect the hook-shaped component and the holding component, wherein in a natural state and in the thickness direction (fig. 2), the holding component (12) is at least spaced apart from a section of the hook-shaped component (18). Regarding claim 2, Struzik teaches the earphone of claim 1, wherein the connecting component (fig. 2; 20) is arranged in a shape of an arc and connected between the holding component and the hook-shaped component. Regarding claim 3, Struzik teaches the earphone of claim 1, wherein a core is set at the holding component, and the holding component (12) has a multi-section structure (52, 70, 74; housing sections), to adjust a relative position of the core on an overall structure of the earphone. Regarding claim 11, Struzik teaches the earphone of claim 1, further including an extending component, wherein the extending component is arranged on the holding component, and extends into any one of a concha cavity, a concha boat, a triangular fossa, and a scapha of the ear in the wearing state; or the extending component (28, movable, col. 5 line 37-col. 6 line 13) is arranged on the hook-shaped component, and hooks a helix or an antihelix of the ear in the wearing state. Regarding claim 12, Struzik teaches the earphone of claim 11, wherein in the wearing state, a side of the holding component in contact with a skin of the user is defined as an inner surface, a side opposite to the inner surface is defined as an outer surface, a side facing an ear hole of the ear, of the holding component facing an ear hole of the ear is defined as a lower surface, a side opposite to the lower surface is defined as an upper surface, and a side of the holding component facing the rear side of the ear is defined as a rear surface (see 112 2nd above), wherein the extending component (28, arm) is arranged on any one of the inner surface, the lower surface, the upper surface, and the rear surface. Regarding claim 13, Struzik teaches the earphone of claim 11, wherein the extending component (28) is detachably connected to the holding component (col. 4 lines 46-64, optional structure; col. 6 lines 1-13, multiple sizes can be used). Regarding claim 15, Struzik teaches the earphone of claim 1, wherein in the wearing state, the connecting component (20) is connected to a lower edge of the holding component. Regarding claim 19, Struzik teaches the earphone of claim 1, wherein a side of the holding component facing the ear includes a first region and a second region, wherein the first region is configured with a sound hole (fig. 3; 15, opening); and the second region (fig. 3; 14 opening) is farther away from the connecting component than the first region and is more protruding toward the ear than the first region, so as to allow the sound hole to be spaced from the ear in the wearing state. Allowable Subject Matter Claim(s) 4-10, 14, 16-18, 20 is/are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed, have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. With respect to the Applicant’s arguments pertaining to claims that Struzik fails to teach “in a natural state and in the thickness direction (fig. 2), the holding component (12) is at least spaced apart from a section of the hook-shaped component (18)”, the Examiner disagrees. PNG media_image1.png 311 493 media_image1.png Greyscale As shown in figure 4, the housing (12) has a cavity which supports the audio component. This cavity creates a thickness wider than the hook-shaped component connected to the housing. Additionally, Struzik shows further illustration in figures 5-6. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHYLESHA DABNEY whose telephone number is (571)272-7494. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Wednesday and Friday 10:30-4:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Fan Tsang can be reached at 5712727547. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. For general questions such as application status, Monday–Friday, 8:30AM -5:00PM, inquiry to: Local: 571-272-1000 Toll-Free: 800-786-9199 TTY: 800-877-8339 Any response to this action should be mailed to: Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks P O Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Or faxed to: (703) 273-8300, for formal communications intended for entry and for informal or draft communications, please label "Proposed" or "Draft" when submitting an informal amendment. Hand-delivered responses should be brought to: Customer Service Window Randolph Building 401 Dulany Street Alexandria, VA 22314 Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. August 4, 2026 /PHYLESHA DABNEY/Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2694
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 09, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Dec 30, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 31, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 06, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684300
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SUPPRESSING SOUND LEAKAGE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684277
EARPHONES
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684282
Spatial Imaging on Audio Playback Devices
1y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672797
HEARING SCREENING AND AMPLIFICATION DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671937
MINIATURE LOUDSPEAKER
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+14.8%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 804 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month