Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/507,327

LENS ASSEMBLY AND PROCESSING METHOD OF LENS ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 13, 2023
Examiner
NGUYEN, DUNG T
Art Unit
2871
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Asphetek Solution Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
1297 granted / 1577 resolved
+14.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+0.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
1616
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
41.4%
+1.4% vs TC avg
§102
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§112
12.7%
-27.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1577 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Applicant’s submitted prior art, Wang, CN 115327728 A. Claim 1 is anticipated by Wang’s figures 1-2 and accompanying text which discloses a lens assembly, comprising: . a first lens 8, comprising a first surface (upper surface of 8) . a second lens 9, comprising a second surface (lower surface of 9), the first surface spaced from the second surface in an assembly direction (fig. 1) . a baffle ring 2 positioned between the first lens and the second lens, the baffle ring comprises a first end and a second end, the first end is connected to the first surface, the second end is connected to the second surface (fig. 1) . a pouring space 7 formed between the first surface, the second surface, and an inner surface of the baffle ring (fig. 1) and a third lens 10, formed by pouring a pouring material into the pouring space and solidifying the pouring material ([0017]-[0018]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-3 and 13-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Applicant’s submitted prior art, Wang, CN 115327728 A. Re claims 2-3, Wang disclose the claimed invention as described above except for an inner concaved annular groove 21 in a radial direction of the baffle ring, wherein the annular groove comprises two intersecting annular bevels, each of the two annular bevels is inclined from an end surface of the baffle ring to a radial outer side of the baffle ring. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to employ the Wang’s baffle ring including an inner concave annular groove as claimed, since it is a conventional construction for liquid filling purposes (through the Wang’s injection port 21). Re claims 13-15, since the processing method is merely a list of forming each component and each component must be performed to make the device, the processing method of lens assembly would be inherent to the device. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-12 and 16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DUNG T NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2297. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 - 5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Carruth can be reached at 571-272-9791. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DUNG T NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 13, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601936
Polarization Modulator With Separate Optical Sections
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601943
DISPLAY PANEL, PREPARATION METHOD OF DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596249
OPTICAL PATH CONTROL APPARATUS, DISPLAY APPARATUS, AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING OPTICAL PATH
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596328
HOLOGRAPHY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591136
Hologram Calculation
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+0.9%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1577 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month