Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/507,389

MOUNT FOR MODULAR HOLSTER

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Nov 13, 2023
Priority
Oct 04, 2021 — provisional 63/262,047 +2 more
Examiner
SKURDAL, COREY NELSON
Art Unit
3734
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Avid Company LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
741 granted / 1204 resolved
-8.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1237
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
41.2%
+1.2% vs TC avg
§102
33.9%
-6.1% vs TC avg
§112
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1204 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. which basis for this Claim(s) 1-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Merzon (US 9,781,986) in view of Laugesen (US 6,098,858). Regarding , Merzon discloses a holster assembly substantially as claimed, including: a holster for supporting a tool the holster having a securing apparatus fixed to the holster; and a holster retainer for releasably retaining the holster, the holster retainer including:a cavity for securing the holster;a channel configured to receive a securing apparatus of the holster,wherein at least a portion of the channel is disposed within the cavity latch extending along a base of the channel latch claim the cavity first opening for receiving the holster and a second opening disposed opposite the first opening. Regarding claim 16, Merzon discloses a modular holster system, comprising: a holster 10 for supporting a tool, the holster having a securing apparatus 20/22/24; a mounting apparatus (col. 2 lines 62-66) configured to receive the securing apparatus of the holster for releasably affixing the holster to a user; a holster retainer 100 for releasably retaining the holster when the holster is not affixed to the user, wherein the holster retainer includes a cavity (Figure 1, internal open space) for securing the holster; a channel 162/165 configured to receive the securing apparatus of the holster, wherein at least a portion of the channel is disposed within the cavity (Figure 1). Merzon discloses the invention substantially as claimed but does not disclose a latch extending along a base of the channel. However, Laugesen discloses a similar retainer 1 for receiving a securing apparatus, the retainer having a channel with a latch 11 that is releasable via lever 12. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to provide a similar latch on the base of the channel of Merzon in order to provide an alternate means of securing the securing apparatus within the channel. Regarding claim 17, modified Merzon discloses the invention substantially as claimed but does not disclose one or more second holsters. However, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to use additional holsters operable for use with the mounting apparatus and retainer, since it has been held that mere duplication of the essential working parts of a device involves only routine skill in the art. St. Regis Paper Co. v. Bemis Co., 193 USPQ 8. Regarding claims 18 and 19, modified Merzon discloses the invention substantially as claimed but does not disclose additional holsters having different widths and lengths than each other. It would have been an obvious matter of design choice to having the additional holster with different widths and lengths, since such a modification would have involved a mere change in the size of a component. A change in size is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In re Rose, 105 USPQ 237 (CCPA 1955). , 12 are rejected base claim be of the of the claim (s) under 35 U.S.C. in and the of the at least regarding the 16-19 over Merzon in view of Laugesen Merzon a holster for supporting a tool, the holster having a securing apparatus 20/22/24 a holster retainer 100 for releasably retaining the holster . Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to COREY NELSON SKURDAL whose telephone number is (571)272-9588. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9am-4pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Newhouse can be reached at 571-272-4544. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /COREY N SKURDAL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3734
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 13, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 05, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 21, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 24, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 28, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698049
Multi-angle Adjustable Bicycle Side Deck
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12690662
SHOULDER TRANSFER WEIGHT SUPPORT SYSTEM AND FACE SHIELD
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12691811
SIDE-RAIL MODULAR, LIGHTWEIGHT LOAD-CARRYING PANELS AND RACKS
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12667171
WEARABLE UMBRELLA
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12643339
Paint Tray Carrying Device
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+11.5%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1204 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month