Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/507,474

CODEBOOK CONSTRUCTION METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 13, 2023
Examiner
ONAMUTI, GBEMILEKE J
Art Unit
2463
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
689 granted / 801 resolved
+28.0% vs TC avg
Minimal -0% lift
Without
With
+-0.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
809
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.9%
+13.9% vs TC avg
§102
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
§112
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 801 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement 2. The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on the 7th of May 2024 and 8th of September 2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 3. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 4. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Independent Claims 1 and 17 recite the limitation ‘……performing, by the UE, time domain bundling based on first information after determining a transmission occasion set, and constructing the semi-static HARQ-ACK codebook based on the result of the time domain bundling; and constructing the semi-static HARQ-ACK codebook based on the result of the time domain bundling; and constructing, by the UE, the semi-static HARQ-ACK codebook based on second information and the last time domain resource assignment record in each row of a time domain resource assignment table……..’ There is/are insufficient antecedent basis for these underlined limitation(s) in the Independent Claims 1 and 17. Dependent Claims 2-10, 18 and 19 are also rejected based on their dependency on Independent Claims 1 and 17. Independent Claims 11 and 20 recite the limitation ‘……wherein the semi-static HARQ-ACK codebook is constructed based on the result of the time domain bundling; or the semi-static HARQ-ACK codebook is constructed based on second information and the last time domain resource assignment record in each row of a time domain resource assignment table…….’. There is/are insufficient antecedent basis for these underlined limitation(s) in the Independent Claims 11 and 20. Dependent Claims 12-16 are also rejected based on their dependency on Independent Claims 11 and 20. Conclusion 5. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GBEMILEKE J ONAMUTI whose telephone number is (571)270-5619. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ASAD NAWAZ can be reached at (571)272-3988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GBEMILEKE J ONAMUTI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2463
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 13, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598127
TESTING WIRELESS NETWORK BY USING MASTER-SLAVE DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598612
DYNAMIC RESOURCE SCHEDULING IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593328
MULTI-LINK OPERATION FOR PEER-TO-PEER WIFI COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587344
CONFIGURATION OF RESOURCE ELEMENTS IN DEMODULATION REFERENCE SIGNALS FOR CHANNEL ESTIMATION AND DATA TRANSMISSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581340
METHOD OF REDUCING TRANSMISSION OF DATA IN A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK BY USING MACHINE LEARNING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (-0.5%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 801 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month