Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/508,191

CAPACITOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 13, 2023
Examiner
SARKAR, ASOK K
Art Unit
2891
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
1012 granted / 1146 resolved
+20.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1166
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
51.7%
+11.7% vs TC avg
§102
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
§112
5.1%
-34.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1146 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 11 – 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Liu, US 2023/0067299. Regarding Claim 1, Liu teaches capacitor device, comprising: pad structures 12; bottom electrodes disposed on the pad structures, respectively; a top electrode 46 disposed on the bottom electrodes 42; and a dielectric layer 44 disposed between the top electrode and the bottom electrodes, wherein the top electrode comprises at least one void 22G with reference to Fig. 2H in paragraphs 20 – 25. Regarding Claim 11, Liu teaches wherein a top width of the at least one void is less than a bottom width of the at least one void with reference to Fig. 2H. Regarding Claim 12, Liu teaches wherein a length of the at least one void in a vertical direction is greater than a length of the at least one void in a horizontal direction with reference to Fig. 2H. Regarding Claim 13, Liu teaches wherein the at least one void is disposed above one of the pad structures in a vertical direction with reference to Fig. 2H. Regarding Claim 14, Liu teaches a manufacturing method of a capacitor device, comprising: forming a bottom electrode 42 on a pad structure 12; and forming a top electrode 46 and a dielectric layer 44, wherein the top electrode is disposed on the bottom electrode, the dielectric layer is disposed between the top electrode and the bottom electrode, and the top electrode comprises at least one void 22G with reference to Fig. 2H in paragraphs 20 – 25. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 – 10 and 15 – 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The reasons for allowing these claims are due to the various components of the capacitor laid out according the limitations of these claims. Furthermore, the art of record does not disclose or anticipate the above limitation in combination with other claim elements nor would it be obvious to modify the art of record so as to form a device including the above limitation. Conclusion Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ASOK K SARKAR whose telephone number is (571)272-1970. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri; 9:30 AM - 6:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Landau can be reached at 571 - 272 - 1731. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ASOK K SARKAR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2891 February 6, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 13, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601048
FILM FORMING METHOD AND FILM FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604601
LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT, QUANTUM DOT SOLUTION, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601055
METHOD OF DEPOSITING ATOMIC LAYER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594622
LASER-ASSISTED METHOD FOR PARTING CRYSTALLINE MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592369
INTEGRATED METHOD AND TOOL FOR HIGH QUALITY SELECTIVE SILICON NITRIDE DEPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+9.2%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1146 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month