Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/508,447

CONFIGURATION METHOD, ALLOCATION METHOD, APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Nov 14, 2023
Priority
May 14, 2021 — continuation of PCTCN2021093964
Examiner
AYAD, SALMA ABDELMONEM
Art Unit
2462
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
43 granted / 54 resolved
+21.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
75
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
88.5%
+48.5% vs TC avg
§102
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
§112
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 54 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed on 02/10/2026 have been fully considered. Applicant’s arguments and Examiner’s response are provided below. Rejections under 35 U.S.C. 102: Applicant argues: Li does not directly notify the device of a domain that includes AI servers, and the device does not know which service node executes the AI service or a corresponding resource to the service node. Examiner’s response: In view of Applicant’s amended claim construction, the rejection continues to rely on LI, but cites different paragraphs to address the amended claims, which relies on LI’s routing information sent to the device as the configuration information. LI discloses in Fig. 7, step 730, that the device receives configuration information of an AI service, that is in the form of an AI service registration response (See [0123]). LI also discloses that the AI service registration response includes routing information specifying how to reach a coordinator associated with the AI service, the coordinator corresponding to a location of the AI service (See [0036]). And in [0128] discloses that the device receives routing information/ updated routing information. Li also discloses in [0127] that the routing information specifies how to reach the coordinator associated with the AI service, and the routing information includes a port number, which is considered a resource for the AI service. Applicant argues: In the present application, the network device first transmits configuration information, and the terminal device can later use this information to initiate a join request. Examiner’s response: In response to applicant's argument that the references fail to show certain features of the invention, it is noted that the features upon which applicant relies (i.e., the terminal device using the AI information to initiate a join request) are not recited in claim 1. Although the claims are interpreted in light of the specification, limitations from the specification are not read into the claims. See In re Van Geuns, 988 F.2d 1181, 26 USPQ2d 1057 (Fed. Cir. 1993). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, 5, 9-10, 12, 14 and 18-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(2) as being anticipated by LI et al. (US 20220060390). Regarding claim 1, LI discloses “A configuration method, applied in a terminal device, the method comprising: receiving configuration information from a network device, the configuration information comprising first domain information corresponding to a first Artificial Intelligence (Al) service” (See Fig. 7, [0123] At step 730, the platform controller 602 notifies the device 701 about availability of the AI service registered at step 710. If step 730 occurs in response to step 720, step 730 may be in the form of a registration response message (i.e. in the form of a response to the device registration request at step 720. [0036] the AI service registration response including routing information at least in part specifying how to reach a coordinator associated with the AI service, the coordinator corresponding to a location of the AI service), “wherein the first domain information corresponding to the first Al service is information related to a first domain for executing the first Al service, wherein the first domain for executing the first Al service comprises at least one of: at least one service node for executing the first Al service or a resource corresponding to each service node” (See [0127] The routing information may specify how to reach the coordinator 601 over data plane interface T2 (e.g. interface T2 402 in FIG. 4). The routing information may include one or more of coordinator network address, port number, protocol type, tunnel end point ID and tunnel ID. [0128] The device 701 then uses the received routing information for transmitting data, message or signal to the coordinator 601 over data plane interface T2 (e.g. interface T2 402 in FIG. 4). After step 770, the platform controller 602 can, at any time, provide updated routing information to the device 701 for the AI service, for example, when the coordinator 601 that the device is associated with is changed or relocated). Regarding claim 3, LI discloses “The method according to claim 1, wherein the resource corresponding to each service node comprises at least one of: a stored and/or used model, a data resource, a computing resource, or a communication resource” (See [0127] The routing information may specify how to reach the coordinator 601 over data plane interface T2 (e.g. interface T2 402 in FIG. 4). The routing information may include one or more of coordinator network address, port number, protocol type, tunnel end point ID and tunnel ID). Regarding claim 5, LI discloses “The method according to claim 1, further comprising, prior to receiving the configuration information from the network device: transmitting first information to the network device, the first information comprising at least one of: an identifier of a service requested by the terminal device, an identifier of the terminal device, capability information of the terminal device, or condition information of the terminal device” (See Fig. 7, [0122] At step 720, the device 701 sends a registration request to the platform controller 602 to be registered at the platform controller 602. The device registration request includes information identifying the device 701. Note: The terminal device sends a registration request including an identifier of the terminal device, before receiving the configuration information). Regarding claim 9, LI discloses “The method according to claim 5, wherein the first information is carried in a registration request transmitted by the terminal device to the network device; and the configuration information is carried in a registration response transmitted by the network device to the terminal device” (See Fig. 7, [0122] At step 720, the device 701 sends a registration request to the platform controller 602 to be registered at the platform controller 602. The device registration request includes information identifying the device 701, [0123] At step 730, the platform controller 602 notifies the device 701 about availability of the AI service registered at step 710. This notification may include information identifying the AI service (e.g. an AI service identifier), step 730 may be in the form of a registration response message (i.e. in the form of a response to the device registration request at step 720), and the AI service availability may be provided to the device 701 in the registration response message). Regarding claim 10, LI discloses “A terminal device, comprising a processor and a transceiver connected to the processor” (See Fig. 11, [0185] The electronic 1100 device may be a mobile device or a device forming part of a cell or base station, a radio access node, control function, infrastructure, or other device in a wireless communication access network or core network), “wherein the transceiver is configured to receive configuration information from a network device, the configuration information comprising first domain information corresponding to a first Artificial Intelligence (AI) service” (See Fig. 7, [0123] At step 730, the platform controller 602 notifies the device 701 about availability of the AI service registered at step 710. If step 730 occurs in response to step 720, step 730 may be in the form of a registration response message (i.e. in the form of a response to the device registration request at step 720. [0036] the AI service registration response including routing information at least in part specifying how to reach a coordinator associated with the AI service, the coordinator corresponding to a location of the AI service), “wherein the first domain information corresponding to the first Al service is information related to a first domain for executing the first Al service, wherein the first domain for executing the first Al service comprises at least one of: at least one service node for executing the first Al service or a resource corresponding to each service node” (See [0127] The routing information may specify how to reach the coordinator 601 over data plane interface T2 (e.g. interface T2 402 in FIG. 4). The routing information may include one or more of coordinator network address, port number, protocol type, tunnel end point ID and tunnel ID. [0128] The device 701 then uses the received routing information for transmitting data, message or signal to the coordinator 601 over data plane interface T2 (e.g. interface T2 402 in FIG. 4). After step 770, the platform controller 602 can, at any time, provide updated routing information to the device 701 for the AI service, for example, when the coordinator 601 that the device is associated with is changed or relocated). Regarding claim 12, LI discloses “The terminal device according to claim 10, wherein the resource corresponding to each service node comprises at least one of: a stored and/or used model, a data resource, a computing resource, or a communication resource” (See [0127] The routing information may specify how to reach the coordinator 601 over data plane interface T2 (e.g. interface T2 402 in FIG. 4). The routing information may include one or more of coordinator network address, port number, protocol type, tunnel end point ID and tunnel ID). Regarding claim 14, LI discloses “The terminal device according to claim 10, wherein the transceiver is further configured to, prior to receiving the configuration information from the network device: transmit first information to the network device, the first information comprising at least one of: an identifier of a service requested by the terminal device, an identifier of the terminal device, capability information of the terminal device, or condition information of the terminal device” (See Fig. 7, [0122] At step 720, the device 701 sends a registration request to the platform controller 602 to be registered at the platform controller 602. The device registration request includes information identifying the device 701. Note: The terminal device sends a registration request including an identifier of the terminal device, before receiving the configuration information). Regarding claim 18, LI discloses “The terminal device according to claim 14, wherein the first information is carried in a registration request transmitted by the terminal device to the network device; and the configuration information is carried in a registration response transmitted by the network device to the terminal device” (See Fig. 7, [0122] At step 720, the device 701 sends a registration request to the platform controller 602 to be registered at the platform controller 602. The device registration request includes information identifying the device 701, [0123] At step 730, the platform controller 602 notifies the device 701 about availability of the AI service registered at step 710. This notification may include information identifying the AI service (e.g. an AI service identifier), step 730 may be in the form of a registration response message (i.e. in the form of a response to the device registration request at step 720), and the AI service availability may be provided to the device 701 in the registration response message). Regarding claim 19, LI discloses “A network device, comprising a processor and a transceiver connected to the processor” (See Fig. 11, [0185] The electronic 1100 device may be a mobile device or a device forming part of a cell or base station, a radio access node, control function, infrastructure, or other device in a wireless communication access network or core network), “wherein the transceiver is configured to transmit configuration information to a terminal device, the configuration information comprising first domain information corresponding to a first Artificial Intelligence (AI) service” (See Fig. 7, [0123] At step 730, the platform controller 602 notifies the device 701 about availability of the AI service registered at step 710. If step 730 occurs in response to step 720, step 730 may be in the form of a registration response message (i.e. in the form of a response to the device registration request at step 720. [0036] the AI service registration response including routing information at least in part specifying how to reach a coordinator associated with the AI service, the coordinator corresponding to a location of the AI service), “wherein the first domain information corresponding to the first Al service is information related to a first domain for executing the first Al service, wherein the first domain for executing the first Al service comprises at least one of: at least one service node for executing the first Al service or a resource corresponding to each service node” (See [0127] The routing information may specify how to reach the coordinator 601 over data plane interface T2 (e.g. interface T2 402 in FIG. 4). The routing information may include one or more of coordinator network address, port number, protocol type, tunnel end point ID and tunnel ID. [0128] The device 701 then uses the received routing information for transmitting data, message or signal to the coordinator 601 over data plane interface T2 (e.g. interface T2 402 in FIG. 4). After step 770, the platform controller 602 can, at any time, provide updated routing information to the device 701 for the AI service, for example, when the coordinator 601 that the device is associated with is changed or relocated). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LI et al. (US 20220060390) in view of WU (US 20230013010 A1). Regarding claims 4 and 13, LI discloses claim 4 of “The method according to claim 1”, and claim 13 of “The terminal device according to claim 10”, but does not explicitly disclose the configuration information including a temporary device identifier for the device to join the domain executing the AI service. However, WU discloses “wherein the configuration information further comprises a temporary device identifier used for the terminal device to join the first domain for executing the first Al service” (See [0110] the proximity service network element sends the temporary identifier to the second terminal device in a registration process of the second terminal device. That it, the proximity service network element allocates the temporary identifier to the second terminal device when receiving a registration request sent by the second terminal device. The proximity service network element sends the registration request response message including the temporary identifier to the second terminal device). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the teachings of LI with the teachings of WU, to include a temporary device identifier for the terminal in the configuration information, to use in a registration/ join request, and the motivation to do so would have been to avoid user privacy exposure (WU [0034]). Claims 6 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LI et al. (US 20220060390) in view of KARAPANTELAKIS et al. (US 20220104079 A1). Regarding claims 6 and 15, LI discloses claim 6 of “The method according to claim 5”, and claim 15 of “The terminal device according to claim 14”. LI discloses that the terminal sends a registration request including information identifying the terminal ([0122]), but does not explicitly disclose that the type of the terminal identifier. However, KARAPANTELAKIS discloses “wherein the identifier of the terminal device comprises at least one of: an International Mobile Subscriber Identity (IMSI), a Globally Unique Temporary User Equipment Identity (GUTI), a Subscription Permanent Identifier (SUPI), or a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) type of identifier” (See [0039] One example of such computation services is a machine learning (ML) model, where the UE 160 thus request execution of the ML model for a particular set of data. [0108] S319: The control node 200 instructs the target compute node 150b to start execution of the stateless computational service by sending a message “Start Execution [list(IMSI, input, modeIID)]”, where the IMSI is the IMSI of the UE 160 that originated the execution request. Note: Since the control node inserts the IMSI of the UE into the “Start Execution” instruction, it implies that the execution request sent by the UE includes the IMSI of the UE). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the teachings of LI with the teachings of KARAPANTELAKIS, and the motivation to do so would have been to uniquely identify the UE imitating the request, enabling proper association of the request and the returned results. Claims 7 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LI et al. (US 20220060390) in view of HONG (US 20230232213 A1). Regarding claims 7 and 16, LI discloses claim 7 of “The method according to claim 5”, and claim 16 of “The terminal device according to claim 14”, but does not explicitly disclose transmitting capability information of the terminal device. However, HONG discloses “wherein the capability information of the terminal device comprises at least one of: a computing capability of the terminal device, a power capacity of the terminal device, a storage capability of the terminal device, or a data type of the terminal device” (See [0039] At step 201, AI capability information indicating an AI capability of the UE is reported to a base station. [0041] AI capability may be a capability that the UE performs AI-related data computation or an AI function that the UE possesses. The reported AI capability may include: whether the UE has an AI capability, and/or, AI data processing rate of the UE such as a computing capability of a processor, and/or, an amount of AI data processable by the UE, and/or, AI model supported by the UE, and/or, a computing capability of the UE for a specific AI algorithm and the like). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the teachings of LI with the teachings of HONG, to have included information about terminal capability in the registration/ AI service request, and the motivation to do so would have been to coordinate the allocation of the AI service based on the AI capability so as to improve an AI service synergy capability between the UE and the base station, and realize resource optimization and effective utilization of the AI capability of the UE (HONG [0047]). Claims 8 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LI et al. (US 20220060390) in view of MU et al. (US 20240323099 A1). Regarding claims 8 and 17, LI discloses claim 8 of “The method according to claim 5”, and claim 17 of “The terminal device according to claim 14”, but does not explicitly disclose transmitting condition information of the terminal. However, MU discloses “wherein the condition information of the terminal device comprises at least one of: a location of the terminal device, a speed of the terminal device, time of the terminal device, or a movement trajectory of the terminal device” (See [0059] In a scenario where the terminal has high-speed mobility, re-delivery of a wireless network AI analysis task is carried out. Terminal access location information is added to analysis request information. When a terminal access location changes, the access location information in the analysis request information is globally maintained by re-initiating the analysis request). Note: The location/ speed of the terminal is included in the AI service request. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the teachings of LI with the teachings of MU, to include location/ speed information of the terminal in the AI service request, and the motivation to do so would have been to ensures continuity and accuracy of an AI analysis service (MU [0059]). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SALMA A AYAD whose telephone number is (571)270-0285. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00 to 5:30 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yemane Mesfin can be reached at 5712723927. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SALMA AYAD/Examiner, Art Unit 2462 /YEMANE MESFIN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2462
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 14, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Feb 10, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12672171
RANDOM ACCESS TIMELINE FOR A REDUCED CAPABILITY DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12659059
INTERFERENCE CANCELLATION APPROACH FOR NEW RADIO SYSTEMS
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12652696
HARQ FEEDBACK TRANSMISSION FOR SIDELINK COMMUNICATION IN UNLICENSED SPECTRUM
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12603827
ASYMMETRIC ROUTING RESOLUTIONS IN MULTI-REGIONAL LARGE SCALE DEPLOYMENTS WITH DISTRIBUTED GATEWAYS
2y 8m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588046
DUAL CONNECTION ON BROADBAND MODEM
3y 9m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+2.3%)
3y 0m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 54 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month