Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/508,632

WIRELESS CHARGER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 14, 2023
Priority
Nov 22, 2022 — CN 202211467099.7
Examiner
HABIB, ASIFA
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
277 granted / 359 resolved
+17.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
372
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
86.3%
+46.3% vs TC avg
§102
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
§112
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 359 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/14/2023 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 4, 7-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hynecek et al. 2023/0115632. Regarding claim 1, Hynecek discloses a wireless charger comprising: a charging body (housing 2) including a charging surface (front side 20) for placement of a device to be charged and a back surface opposite to the charging surface [FIG 2-3] [21-29]; and a holder (structural plate 3/6) cooperating with the charging body to allow the device to be charged to be tilted [21-29][ FIG 2-3]; wherein the charging body and the holder are provided separately, there are multiple installation grooves (parallel grooves 22) on the back surface, and the holder is able to be inserted into corresponding installation grooves so that the charging body is able to be tilted at multiple angles [21-29] [FIG 2-3]. Regarding claim 2, Hynecek discloses all of the limitations of claim 1. Hynecek further discloses the shape of the holder (plates 3/6) is a cuboid, and its cross-sectional shape is a rectangle [FIG 2-3]. Regarding claim 4, Hynecek discloses all of the limitations of claim 1. Hynecek further discloses the back side of the charging body is provided with a receiving cavity, and the holder is able to be completely received in the receiving cavity [FIG 2-3]. Regarding claim 7, Hynecek discloses all of the limitations of claim 4. Hynecek further discloses the plurality of installation grooves are provided in the receiving cavity and arranged along a lengthwise direction of the receiving cavity [FIG 2-3] [21-29]. Regarding claim 8, Hynecek discloses all of the limitations of claim 7. Hynecek further discloses there are three installation grooves, a lengthwise direction of the middle installation groove of the three installation grooves is along the lengthwise direction of the receiving cavity, a lengthwise direction of each of the two installation grooves located on sides is perpendicular to the lengthwise direction of the receiving cavity [FIG 2-3]. Regarding claim 9, Hynecek discloses all of the limitations of claim 4. Hynecek further discloses the charging body includes an outer shell (outer casing of magnetic charger 15), a circuit board (internal elements of charger 15) contained in the outer shell, a coil for charging the device to be charged, and a magnetic element (magnetic attachment to base) magnetically attracting the device to be charged on the charging body [23-29][ FIG 2-3] [FIG 6]. Regarding claim 10, Hynecek discloses all of the limitations of claim 9. Hynecek further discloses a charging cable (cable attached to charger 15) connected to the circuit board and extending out of the outer shell, and the direction in which the charging cable extends out of the outer shell is perpendicular to the lengthwise direction of the receiving cavity [FIG 6]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3, 5-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hynecek et al. 2023/0115632 in view of Breiwa et al. 2021/0005368. Regarding claim 3, Hynecek discloses all of the limitations of claim 1. However, Hynecek fails to explicitly disclose the holder is magnetically attracted to the charging body. Breiwa discloses the holder is magnetically attracted (magnetic attachment means 105) to the charging body [FIG 1-2] [71-73]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention as Breiwa is analogous art that further discloses, “An electronic device holder and charging system with integrated charging and data transfer interface and a self-aligning, magnetic coupling and docking interface with on-demand decoupling feature are also disclosed.” [abstract]. Regarding claim 5, Hynecek discloses all of the limitations of claim 4. However, Hynecek fails to explicitly disclose the holder includes a first magnetic element and an insulating material formed on the first magnetic element. Breiwa discloses the holder includes a first magnetic element and an insulating material formed on the first magnetic element [71-73]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention as Breiwa is analogous art that further discloses, “An electronic device holder and charging system with integrated charging and data transfer interface and a self-aligning, magnetic coupling and docking interface with on-demand decoupling feature are also disclosed.” [abstract]. Regarding claim 6, Hynecek in view of Breiwa discloses all of the limitations of claim 5. Breiwa further discloses the charging body is provided with a second magnetic element (magnetic attachment means 103) capable of attracting the first magnetic element [072] [FIG 18A]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ASIFA HABIB whose telephone number is (571)270-7032. The examiner can normally be reached 10-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steve Paik can be reached at 571-272-2404. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ASIFA HABIB/Examiner, Art Unit 2876 /THIEN M LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2876
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 14, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12657983
COIN HANDLING APPARATUS
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12646041
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VENDING AND/OR PURCHASING MOBILE PHONES AND OTHER ELECTRONIC DEVICES
1y 4m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12640014
ZERO TRUST BASED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ALGORITHM DRIVEN REIMAGE PROCESS ON AN AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE LEVERAGING RAM PARTITIONING
2y 12m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12632689
FINGER-ACTIVATED CHIP OR CONTACTLESS CARD
4y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12620289
ANTI-COUNTERFEIT VERIFICATION
3y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+14.7%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 359 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month