Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/509,225

ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103§Other
Filed
Nov 14, 2023
Priority
Nov 22, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0156931
Examiner
GREEN, TRACIE Y
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
1119 granted / 1408 resolved
+11.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1435
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
63.8%
+23.8% vs TC avg
§102
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1408 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/14/2023 has been considered by the examiner. Election/Restrictions Claims 13-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected method / species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 05/15/2026. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 and 7-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yeong, (KR10-2021-008487, machine translation, 07-2021, foreign translation-ids) in view of Lee,( KR 20150042989 A, machine translation, 04-2015). Regarding claim 1, An organic light-emitting display device, comprising: a first anode electrode (4) (41) disposed in a first sub-pixel (21); a second anode electrode (42)) disposed in a second sub-pixel (22); a third anode electrode(43) disposed in a third sub-pixel (23); a first organic light-emitting layer(61), a first cathode electrode (7), a first portion of a second organic light-emitting layer (62), and a first portion of a second cathode electrode (7) sequentially stacked on the first anode electrode(41) and the second anode electrode (42); and a second portion of the second organic light-emitting layer (62)and a second portion of the second cathode electrode (7)sequentially stacked on the third anode electrode, Yeong fails to explicitly to disclose at least one ground electrode disposed in the third sub-pixel and spaced apart from the third anode electrode; wherein at least a portion of a side edge of the second portion of the second cathode electrode contacts the at least one ground electrode. Lee in (Figure 3) discloses The secondary ground electrode (113) is separated to the anode electrode (111) and drain electrode (D) and the conventional cathode electrode (151)(Second electrode) improves the structure where the center brightness is reduced with the surface resistance it is formed in upper part of the insulating layer (115); wherein at least a portion of a side edge of the second portion of the second cathode electrode (151) contacts the at least one ground electrode (113). It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify . The organic light-emitting display device of Yeong as disclosed by Lee wherein at least one ground electrode disposed in the third sub-pixel and spaced apart from the third anode electrode; wherein at least a portion of a side edge of the second portion of the second cathode electrode contacts the at least one ground electrode the motivation being the reduction of surface resistance thus increasing brightness. Regarding claims 7-10, the limitations wherein the at least one ground electrode includes a pair of ground electrodes spaced apart from each other and disposed in the third sub-pixel, wherein two opposing edges of the second portion of the second cathode electrode are in contact with the pair of ground electrodes, respectively (claim 7), wherein the at least one ground electrode is formed in a rectangular ring shape and is disposed in the third sub-pixel, wherein four side edges of the second portion of the second cathode electrode are in contact with the at least one ground electrode (claim 8); wherein the at least one ground electrode includes: a first extension extending in a first direction; and a pair of second extensions extending from the first extension in a second direction transverse the first direction, wherein the pair of second extensions are spaced apart from each other and are disposed in the third sub-pixel, wherein three side edges of the second portion of the second cathode electrode contact the at least one ground electrode Claim 9); wherein the first organic light-emitting layer includes a yellow light-emitting layer and a green light-emitting layer, and the second organic light-emitting layer includes a blue light-emitting layer(Claim 10) do not appear to contain any additional features which define more than slight constructional changes which come within the scope of the customary (design) practice followed by persons skilled in the art, especially as the advantages thus achieved can be readily contemplated in advance. Alternatively, these limitations are not deemed patentable since the applicant’s disclosure fails to show such limitations to solve any problems or to yield any unobvious advantage that is not within the scope of the teachings applied. Therefore, such limitations would be a matter of design alternative. It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify the display of Yeong utilizing the disclosure of Yeong and Lee, wherein the at least one ground electrode includes a pair of ground electrodes spaced apart from each other and disposed in the third sub-pixel, wherein two opposing edges of the second portion of the second cathode electrode are in contact with the pair of ground electrodes, respectively; wherein the at least one ground electrode is formed in a rectangular ring shape and is disposed in the third sub-pixel, wherein four side edges of the second portion of the second cathode electrode are in contact with the at least one ground electrode (; wherein the at least one ground electrode includes: a first extension extending in a first direction; and a pair of second extensions extending from the first extension in a second direction transverse the first direction, wherein the pair of second extensions are spaced apart from each other and are disposed in the third sub-pixel, wherein three side edges of the second portion of the second cathode electrode contact the at least one ground electrode ; wherein the first organic light-emitting layer includes a yellow light-emitting layer and a green light-emitting layer, and the second organic light-emitting layer includes a blue light-emitting layer the motivation being to provide can prevent that the cathode electrode is circuit-shorted while this application prevents the generation of the side leakage current through the organic light-emitting layer. Regarding claim 11 Yeong discloses wherein the first organic light-emitting layer(61) includes a red light-emitting layer , and a green light-emitting layer, and the second organic light-emitting layer(62) includes a blue light-emitting layer (page 7, 7th paragraph, page 14, 7th paragraph). Regarding claim 12 Yeong discloses a red color filter (91)disposed in the first sub-pixel (21); and a green color filter(92) disposed in the second sub-pixel(22) (Page 15, 3rd-6th paragraphs). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 and 3 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 4-6 are objected to due to their dependency upon claims 2 and 3. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure can be found in the 892 and below US 20180083087 A1- General state of the Art -An OLED display device includes a display area of a substrate to display images; a non-display area surrounding the display area and applying signals to pixels US 20160284776 A1-General state of the art- light-emitting display devices, organic light-emitting display devices, which may be self-luminous display devices, may exhibit wide viewing angle, high contrast, and fast response speed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TRACIE Y GREEN whose telephone number is (571)270-3104. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thursday, 10am-8pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James R Greece can be reached at (571)272-3711. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TRACIE Y GREEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 14, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707776
DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707777
LIGHT-EMITTING SUBSTRATE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME, DISPLAY PANEL
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707783
DISPLAY DEVICE USING SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707820
DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701890
DISPLAY DEVICE, DISPLAY MODULE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 12m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+9.3%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1408 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month