Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/509,691

RANGE HOODS AND VEHICLES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 15, 2023
Examiner
SHIRSAT, VIVEK K
Art Unit
3762
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Wuhu Midea Smart Kitchen Appliance Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
781 granted / 1061 resolved
+3.6% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
60 currently pending
Career history
1121
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
45.7%
+5.7% vs TC avg
§102
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
§112
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1061 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-8, and 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lin (US 5,537,988). With respect to claim 1 Lin discloses a range hood [reference character 100] comprising: a box [reference character 102] provided with an accommodation cavity [see annotated Fig. below], and an air inlet [reference character 101] and an air outlet [see annotated Fig. below] communicating with the accommodation cavity; a fan [reference characters 104 and a fan blade unit, see Fig. 4 and column 4 lines 6-22] at least partially housed in the accommodation cavity, the fan comprising an impeller [a fan blade unit, see Fig. 4 and column 4 lines 6-22] and a motor [reference character 104] which is connected to and configured to drive the impeller, wherein a projection of the impeller [reference character 1032] is within a projection of the air inlet [reference character 11] in an axial direction of the impeller, a gap [reference character 1021] existing between the projection of the impeller and the projection of the air inlet; and a first baffle ring [reference characters 10], wherein a projection of the first baffle ring covers the gap in the axial direction of the impeller [see Fig. 4]. PNG media_image1.png 428 789 media_image1.png Greyscale With respect to claim 2 Lin discloses that the impeller comprises an impeller body [a fan blade unit, see Fig. 4 and column 4 lines 6-22] which is connected to and driven by the motor and a second baffle ring [reference character 20] connected to a peripheral edge of the impeller body [via the intervening structure of the hood], the second baffle ring extending along the axial direction of the impeller [see Fig. 4], the first baffle ring extending along a radial direction of the impeller [see Fig. 4], and an inner ring of the first baffle ring being connected to the second baffle ring [via the intervening structure of the hood see Fig. 4]. With respect to claim 3 Lin discloses that the first baffle ring has a side located opposite to the accommodation cavity [at reference character 18] which is connected in a smooth transition way to an inner ring of the second baffle ring [reference character 22 see Figs. 2 and 4]. With respect to claim 4 Lin discloses that the inner ring of the first baffle ring extends to form a guide arc ring [reference character 26] facing away and protruding beyond the motor, and the guide arch ring is connected to the second baffle ring [see Fig. 2]. With respect to claim 5 Lin discloses the first baffle ring is connected to the outer peripheral edge of the impeller [via the intervening structure of the hood], and the first baffle ring and the box define an air passage communicating with the gap [see Fig. 4]. With respect to claim 6 Lin discloses that a depth of the air passage in the axial direction of the impeller ranges from 3 mm to 8 mm [column 4 lines 31-32]. With respect to claim 7 Lin discloses that the first baffle ring, the second baffle ring and the impeller are integrally formed1 [see Fig. 4]. With respect to claim 8 Lin discloses that the box comprises a box body provided with the accommodation cavity and the air outlet [see Fig. 4], and a first housing [see annotated Fig. below] detachably connected to the box body [the housing can be detached by cutting], the first housing provided with the air inlet which tapers toward the fan. PNG media_image2.png 401 697 media_image2.png Greyscale With respect to claim 12 Lin discloses that the fan is configured as an axial flow fan2 [see Fig. 4, where the flow is shown as entering and exiting parallel to the rotational axis of the fan]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lin (US 5,537,988) in view of Bernstein (US 2,857,836). With respect to claim 11 Lin does not disclose that an extending direction of the air inlet is different from an extending direction of the air outlet. Bernstein discloses an exhaust fan where an extending direction of the air inlet [through reference character 20 in Fig. 1] is different from an extending direction of the air outlet [reference character 14 in Fig. 1]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the filing date of the invention to modify the system taught by Lin by extending the direction of the air outlet such that it is different from the air inlet, as taught by Bernstein, in order to allow for the installation of the exhaust in the lower floor of a building without extending the exhaust duct all the way through the roof. Claim(s) 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Crean et. al (US 2006/0267363 A1) in view of Lin (US 5,537,988). With respect to claim 13 Crean disclose a vehicle [reference character 100] including a stove [see Fig. 3A]. Crean does not disclose the range hood according to claim 1. Lin discloses the exhaust hood according to claim 1 [see rejection for claim 1]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the filing date of the invention to modify the vehicle taught by Crean by integrating the exhaust hood taught by Lin over the stove taught by Crean in order to allow for the removal of cooking fumes from the stove. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 9-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VIVEK K SHIRSAT whose telephone number is (571)272-3722. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00AM-5:20AM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven B McAllister can be reached at 571-272-6785. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VIVEK K SHIRSAT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3762 1 Integral is defined as “[m]ade up of component parts which together constitute a unity…” [“Integral, Adj. & N.” Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford UP, December 2025, https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/7705476803.]. Therefore, since all of the component parts of Lin together constitute a unified exhaust fan the components required by claim 12 are interpreted as “integrally formed”. 2 An axial flow fan is defined as “[a] fan with blades that cause a gas, usually air, to flow primarily parallel to the shaft around which the blades rotate” [Atkins, T., & Escudier, M. (2013). axial fan. In A Dictionary of Mechanical Engineering.: Oxford University Press. Retrieved 7 Jan. 2026, from https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199587438.001.0001/acref-9780199587438-e-361].
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 15, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601528
SOLAR ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL SYSTEM, APPARATUS, AND METHOD RELATING THERETO
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595935
SOLAR RECEIVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590707
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVED CONVECTION AIRFLOW IN A COOKING APPLIANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590723
HVAC SYSTEM WITH WIRELESS DAMPER AND ZONING CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590703
ELECTRONIC CLOSED-LOOP CONTROL DEVICE FOR FIREPLACES COMPRISING A LOWER COMBUSTION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+28.5%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1061 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month