Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/509,991

Adjustable Platform Corner X-Wing Support

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Nov 15, 2023
Examiner
HAYES, KRISTEN C
Art Unit
3642
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
857 granted / 1250 resolved
+16.6% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
1299
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
§102
34.3%
-5.7% vs TC avg
§112
33.1%
-6.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1250 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The listing of references in the specification is not a proper information disclosure statement. 37 CFR 1.98(b) requires a list of all patents, publications, or other information submitted for consideration by the Office, and MPEP § 609.04(a) states, "the list may not be incorporated into the specification but must be submitted in a separate paper." Therefore, unless the references have been cited by the examiner on form PTO-892, they have not been considered. Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they do not include the following reference sign(s) mentioned in the description: 261. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Reference characters 270/270 and 230/231 are used interchangeably in the drawings to designate either castors or scissor ends. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 11 recites the limitation "the lower frame" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 11 recites the limitation "the unsupported corner" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 8-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Mather US 1,840,591. Regarding claim 8, Mather discloses a height-adjustable platform comprising: a base frame (37); a slider frame assembly (Mather, page 2: lines 55-61) slidably mounted on the base frame; a lifting mechanism attached to said base frame for moving said slider frame relative to said base frame (Mather, page 1: lines 86-94); and a scissor mechanism (30, 31) having a first beam and a second beam connected to the first beam with a pivot mechanism (32), wherein the first beam has a lower end (31a) connected to the base frame by a lower sliding connection located near a corner of the base frame without a lifting mechanism and a second end connected to the slider frame by an upper pivoting connection (35) located near the lifting mechanism. Regarding claim 9, Mather further discloses the second beam having a lower end connected to the base frame by a lower pivoting connection (34) located near the lifting mechanism and a second end connected to the slider frame by an upper sliding connection (30a) (Mather, Figure 5) for providing support for the slider frame. Regarding claim 10, Mather discloses a height-adjustable platform comprising: a base frame (37); a slider frame assembly (Mather, page 2: lines 55-61) slidably mounted on the base frame; a lifting mechanism attached to said base frame for moving said slider frame relative to said base frame (Mather, page 1: lines 86-94); and a scissor mechanism (30. 31) having a first beam and a second beam connected to the first beam with a pivot mechanism (32), wherein the first beam has a lower end connected to the base frame by a lower sliding connection (31a) located near a corner of the base frame without a lifting mechanism and a second end connected to the slider frame by an upper pivoting connection (35) located near the lifting mechanism; and wherein the second beam has a lower end connected to the base frame by a lower pivoting connection (54) located near the lifting mechanism and a second end connected to the slider frame by an upper sliding connection (30a) (Mather, Figure 5) for providing support for the slider frame. Regarding claim 11, Mather further discloses the scissor mechanism also acts on the unsupported corner to lift the lower frame up when the lifting mechanism is lowered (as best understood)(Mather, Figure 1). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-7 and 12 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Mather teaches legs 12 which surround the lifting mechanism, teaching away from at least one leg being without the lifting mechanism. The prior art does fails to disclose or suggest the claimed invention wherein the slider frame comprises castors. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US 9,212,038. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KRISTEN C HAYES whose telephone number is (571)272-7881. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michener Joshua can be reached at 571.272.1467. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KRISTEN C HAYES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 15, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599802
TRAINING MECHANISM AND ROBOT FOR WATER-BASED LOWER-LIMB REHABILITATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599114
Cover for a Retractable Dog Leash
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588603
INTERENGAGEABLE CONTAINERS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582850
CABLE SLEEVE FOR FALL PROTECTION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582058
PRODUCTION FACILITY LAYOUTS FOR AUTOMATED CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT AGRICULTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+21.6%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1250 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month