Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/510,161

SIGNAL TRANSIMISSION WITH IMPROVED COUNTER INTERMODULATION PERFORMANCE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Nov 15, 2023
Examiner
DEPPE, BETSY LEE
Art Unit
2633
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Spreadtrum Communications Usa INC.
OA Round
2 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
378 granted / 448 resolved
+22.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
459
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§103
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
§102
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
§112
52.5%
+12.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 448 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to the communications filed October 30, 2025. Claims 1-20 are pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings were received on October 30, 2025 are acceptable. Claim Objections Claims 12-20 are objected to because of the following informalities: in claim 12, line 10, “wherein N comprises 4 and 6” should be deleted; and dependent claim(s) are objected to under the same ground(s) as the claim(s) from which it depends. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 2-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. With regard to claims 2-4, the specification, at the time the application, does not describe an embodiment of the invention comprising a six-phase mixer circuit (see claim 1, lines 17-19) in combination with N=4, the plurality of differential signal pairs and the details of the mixer circuit as recited in claim 2. The plurality of differential signal pairs and the details of the mixer circuit recited in claim 2 correspond to the 4-phase transmitter embodiment in FIGS. 3A-1 and 3A-2 whereas the six-phase mixer of claim 1 is directed to the 6-phase transmitter embodiment in FIGS. 4A-1 and 4A-2. The specification, at the time the application was filed, does not describe combining aspects of both transmitter embodiments as encompassed by the scope of claim 2. Similarly, with regard to claims 5-7, the specification, at the time the application, does not describe an embodiment of the invention comprising a four-phase mixer circuit (see claim 1, lines 14-16) in combination with N=6, the plurality of differential signal pairs and the details of the mixer circuit as recited in claim 5. The plurality of differential signal pairs and the details of the mixer circuit recited in claim 5 correspond to 6-phase transmitter embodiment in FIGS. 4A-1 and 4A-2 whereas the four-phase mixer of claim 1 is directed to the 4-phase transmitter embodiment in FIGS. 3A-1 and 3A-2. The specification, at the time the application was filed, does not describe combining aspects of both transmitter embodiments as encompassed by the scope of claim 5. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 and 8-11 are allowed. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Mittal et al. (US Patent No. 10,348,528 B2) discloses a six-phase mixer circuit and Asuri et al. (US Patent No. 10,454,509 B2) discloses a four-phase mixer circuit but the respective circuits in these references do not mix a plurality of differential signal pairs with a plurality of pulse signals wherein the plurality of signals have the same duty ratio greater than 16.7% or the same duty ratio greater than 25%, respectively. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Betsy Deppe whose telephone number is 571-272-3054. The examiner can normally be reached Monday, Wednesday and Thursday, 7:00 am - 3:00 pm (ET). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sam Ahn can be reached at 571-272-3044. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BETSY DEPPE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2633
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 15, 2023
Application Filed
May 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Oct 30, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 26, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Mar 24, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 30, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 30, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 31, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592815
FRAME SYNCH DETECTION WITH RATE ADAPTATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12580525
TRANSMISSION DEVICE AND SIGNAL PREDISTORTION METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574200
CLOCK AND MULTI-VALUED DATA SIGNALLING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12562762
DIGITAL TRANSMITTER FEATURING A 50%-LO SIGNED PHASE MAPPER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12562945
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING MODULATION COMPRESSION OF DATA TRANSMITTED THROUGH USER PLANE MESSAGE IN FRONTHAUL INTERFACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+13.3%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 448 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month