Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/510,194

RETENTION OF VEHICLE DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 15, 2023
Examiner
LYJAK, LORI LYNN
Art Unit
3612
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Atieva, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allow Rate
1074 granted / 1195 resolved
+37.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1217
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
§102
47.5%
+7.5% vs TC avg
§112
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1195 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 19, the subject-matter is defined as a display device (suitable) for (use in) a vehicle; “a fail portion of a cross-vehicle beam in the vehicle” (lines 3-4); and “an opening of the cross-vehicle beam” (line 5) cites vehicle structure. It appears therefore that claim 19 does not only set forth features of a display device of a vehicle for which the device is for use, but instead defines the relationship of the display device to some elements of the vehicle which are external features and are themselves not within the scope of protection of the claim, thus rendering claim 19 unclear. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-18 and 20 are allowed. Claims 19 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 1, ES 2915057 B2 (cited by applicant) discloses an assembly for a vehicle (as shown in Figure 1), the assembly comprising: a cross-vehicle beam (structural element 411 as shown in Figure 4) including a first fail portion, wherein a first notch is formed in the first fail portion (the notch in the C-shaped side guide channels 412 as shown in Figure 4), and a display device (multimedia monitor 111 as shown in Figure 1) mounted to the cross-vehicle beam using the first failed portion, the display device having a first arm (the rear body 212 presents, in plain view, a U-shape formed by two lateral support arms 216; the retaining device 211 is capable of supporting the multimedia monitor in the mounting position, if the lateral guide bodies 218 are inserted inside the C-shaped channel 412; in addition, the C-shaped lateral guide channels 412 serve as centering means for the correct positioning of the multimedia monitor 111 on the motor vehicle in the final mounting position). Claim 1 differs from ES 2915057 B2 in that said fail portion comprises a first pocket having a first opening that faces substantially rearward in the vehicle; and said arm is configured to extend through the first opening, the first arm having a first cutout configured to engage with the first opening in response to failure of at least the first fail portion. Regarding claim 19, ES 2915057 B2 (cited by applicant) discloses a display device (multimedia monitor 111 as shown in Figure 1) for a vehicle (as shown in Figure 1), the display device (multimedia monitor 111 as shown in Figure 1) comprising: a housing (multimedia monitor 111 area around the display screen as show in Figure 1) having a display (multimedia monitor 111 display screen as shown in Figure 1), the housing (multimedia monitor 111 area around the display screen as show in Figure 1) defining: a mount configured for mounting the display device (multimedia monitor 111 as shown in Figure 1) to a fail portion (the notch in the C-shaped side guide channels 412 as shown in Figure 4) of a cross-vehicle beam (structural element 411 as shown in Figure 4) in the vehicle. Claim 19 differs from ES 2915057 B2 in that an arm to extend through an opening of the cross-vehicle beam, the arm having a cutout configured to engage with the opening in response to the fail portion failing. Regarding claim 20, ES 2915057 B2 (cited by applicant) discloses a vehicle (as shown in Figure 1) comprising: a vehicle body (as shown in Figure 1); a cross-vehicle beam (structural structure 411 as shown in Figure 4) mounted to the vehicle body (as shown in Figure 1) in a transverse direction, the cross-vehicle beam (structural structure 411 as shown in Figure 4) including i) a fail portion, wherein a notch is formed in the fail portion (the notch in the C-shaped side guide channels 412 as shown in Figure 4), and the display device (multimedia monitor 111 as shown in Figure 1) having an arm (the rear body 212 presents, in plain view, a U-shape formed by two lateral support arms 216; the retaining device 211 is capable of supporting the multimedia monitor in the mounting position, if the lateral guide bodies 218 are inserted inside the C-shaped channel 412; in addition, the C-shaped lateral guide channels 412 serve as centering means for the correct positioning of the multimedia monitor 111 on the motor vehicle in the final mounting position). Claim 20 differs from ES 2915057 B2 in that said fail portion comprises a first pocket having a first opening that faces substantially rearward in the vehicle; and said arm is configured to extend through the first opening, the first arm having a first cutout configured to engage with the first opening in response to failure of at least the first fail portion. Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. DE 202020100757 U1 discloses the assembly has a display screen which is positioned in a housing. The housing includes first and second protrusions. A first bracket is coupled to the vehicle cross structure; a second bracket is coupled to the first bracket and to the first and second protrusions of the housing; the second bracket is coupled to the vehicle cross structure; the second bracket is coupled to a lower surface of the first bracket; the second bracket is coupled to a portion of the first bracket located in the rear of the vehicle. Communication Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Lori Lyjak whose telephone number is (571)272-6658. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 AM-4:30 PM (EST) Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amy Weisberg can be reached at 571-270-5500. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Lori Lyjak/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 15, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600303
VEHICLE INTERIOR WALL PANEL AND WALL PANEL ASSEMBLY WITH DOOR STOPPER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595005
MODULAR AND SCALABLE ACTIVE REAR DIFFUSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594997
Side Reinforcing Structure of Vehicle Body
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583391
LUGGAGE SPACE-EXTENSIBLE SLIDABLE AND PIVOTABLE BOARD STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576913
VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+8.4%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1195 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month