Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/510,802

RECEIVER CIRCUITRY AND A METHOD FOR RECEIVING POWER THROUGH WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER, AND AN IMPLANT DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 16, 2023
Priority
Nov 25, 2022 — EU 22209624.0
Examiner
GUDORF, LAURA A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Stichting Imec Nederland
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
728 granted / 899 resolved
+21.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
907
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
52.1%
+12.1% vs TC avg
§102
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
§112
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 899 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Summary The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This is a first Office Action on the merits. Claims 1-14 are currently pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 5, 8, 9, 13, and 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by DESAI et al, US 2017/0040831. Re claim 1: DESAI teaches a receiver circuitry for receiving power through wireless power transfer, said receiver circuitry comprising: A power receiver configured to receive a power signal from a wireless power transmitter and generate an alternating current (AC) input signal (i.e., inductive element 80 [0067] [Figure 6]); A converter circuit configured to receive the AC input signal and to convert the AC input signal to a direct current (DC) output signal (i.e., rectifier 81 and DC-DC converter 85 form a converter circuit [0069]-[0071] [Figure 6]); A control unit configured to control at least one parameter of the converter circuit for controlling efficiency of power transfer (i.e., controller 86 [0069]-[0071] [Figure 6]); A detector configured to generate a measurement signal representing available power of the AC input signal (i.e., current sensor 87 in conjunction with peak detector 88 [0069] [Figure 6]); Wherein the control unit is configured to receive the measurement signal from the detector and to control the at least one parameter based on the measurement signal for feedforward control of the at least one parameter (i.e., processor 92 receives output of the peak detector and is configured to provide feed forward control of the duty cycle of the DC-DC converter [0069]-[0071]). Re claim 2: DESAI discloses the receiver circuitry according to claim 2, wherein the detector is a peak detector configured to detect an amplitude of the AC input signal for the power receiver being unloaded, whereby the measurement signal represents the amplitude of the AC input signal [0069]. Re claim 5: DESAI discloses the receiver circuitry according to claim 1, wherein the control unit is configured to store a conversion rule for converting a value of the measurement signal to a control signal for controlling a value of the at least one parameter (implicit [0070] [0071]). Re claim 8: DESAI discloses the receiver circuitry according to claim 1, wherein the converter circuit comprises a rectifier circuit (81), configured to receive the AC input signal and to convert the AC input signal to a DC input signal, and a DC-DC converter circuit (85) configured to convert the DC input signal to the DC output signal, wherein the control unit is configured to control more than one parameter of the rectifier circuit and/or the DC-DC converter circuit [0056] [0069]-[0071] [Figure 6]. Re claim 9: DESAI discloses the receiver circuitry according to claim 8, wherein the rectifier circuit comprises a comparator configured to drive a switch [0068]. Re claim 13: DESAI discloses an implant device comprising the receiver circuitry according to claim 1, wherein the implant device is configured to be implanted in a body and configured to receive power through wireless power transfer [0072]. Re claim 14: DESAI discloses a method for receiving power through wireless power transfer, said method comprising: Receiving a power signal from a wireless power transmitter [0067]; Generating an alternating current (AC) input signal based on the power signal [0067] [0068]; Measuring the AC input signal to generate a measurement signal representing available power of the AC input signal [0069]; Controlling at least one parameter based on the measurement signal for feedforward control of the at least one parameter, wherein the at least one parameter is at least one parameter of a converter circuit, configured to receive the AC input signal and to convert the AC input signal to a direct current (DC) output signal [0069]-[0071]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3 and 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DESAI et al, US 2017/0040831. Re claim 3: DESAI discloses the receiver circuitry according to claim 2, but does not specify the detector comprises an active peak detector; however, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art for the peak detector of DESAI to be an active peak detector. Active peak detectors are merely one common type of peak detector that provides higher accuracy than passive peak detectors. Re claim 4: DESAI discloses the receiver circuitry according to claim 2, but does not specify the detector comprises a passive peak detector; however, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date for the peak detector of DESAI to be a passive peak detector. Passive peak detectors are merely one common type of peak detector that is known to provide simple and low-cost detection that do not require connection to a power source. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6, 7, and 10-12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: SMITH et al, US 2013/0310630, teaches a method and system for powering implantable devices. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LAURA A GUDORF whose telephone number is (571)270-7607. If the Examiner cannot be reached by telephone, she can be reached through the following e-mail address: laura.gudorf@uspto.gov. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 6:00-4:00 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas Pham, can be reached at telephone number (571)272-3689. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. /LAURA A GUDORF/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2876
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 16, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12743686
POINT OF SALE DEVICES
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12718643
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING VOTER ELIGIBILTY AND FACILITATING SECURE ELECTRONIC VOTING
1y 1m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12712385
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A COMPACT RECEIVER ASSEMBLY TO WIRELESSLY CHARGE AN ELECTRICAL VEHICLE
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12711340
Systems and Methods to Optimize Imaging Settings and Image Capture for a Machine Vision Job
1y 6m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12711338
Dual Mode Aimer for Long Range Barcode Scanning
1y 4m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+12.1%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 899 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month