Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/511,347

IN VITRO MODEL DEVICE FOR PLACENTAL BARRIER

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 16, 2023
Priority
Nov 16, 2022 — provisional 63/384,011
Examiner
FRISBY, KESHA
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Cfd Research Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allowance Rate
397 granted / 758 resolved
-17.6% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
787
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§103
52.0%
+12.0% vs TC avg
§102
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
§112
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 758 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2-10 & 21-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 2, 3, 5 & 30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. These claims contain an instance of vague indefinite claim language, including the use of the phrase “may, optionally, can”. It is unclear whether the features following “may, optionally, can” in each claim is intended to be positively recited as part of the claimed invention. Dependent claims 5-8 all recite the term “about”. The specification does not provide some standard for measuring that degree. Dependent claims 4-6 all recite “in order”. What does that mean? The order in which the steps will take place and/or must be in the order claimed (one step after the other). Clarity is needed. Further, claims 21-30 are rejected as Independent claims 21 & 23 are providing and determining information. There is no end result. In other words, what happens after this is information is provided or determined. Some claims are rejected due to their dependencies. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 & 11-20 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: None of the cited patents and/or publications used together or separately teach which is configured as a microfluidic in vitro model of a placenta. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Citation of Pertinent Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Shukla et al. (U.S. Publication Number 2020/0370008 A1) teaches placental lipid bilayer for cell-free molecular interaction studies. Cooper (U.S. Publication Number 2004/193096 A1) teaches conceptus chamber. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KESHA FRISBY whose telephone number is (571)272-8774. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 730AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xuan Thai can be reached at 571-272-7147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KESHA FRISBY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 16, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §112
Mar 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640054
COMPUTATIONAL IN SILICO MODEL FOR PLACENTAL BARRIER
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640058
SYSTEM FOR SIMULATING THORACIC CAGE AND LUMBAR SPINE REGION
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633226
AUTOMATED CUSTOMIZATION VIRTUAL ECOSYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12626608
SYSTEM TO DETERMINE A PERSONALIZED LEARNING PATHWAY
3y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12626609
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM
2y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+23.9%)
3y 8m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 758 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month