Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/511,834

Coolant Distribution Unit Pump Control

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 16, 2023
Priority
Nov 16, 2022 — provisional 63/383,939
Examiner
KABIR, SAAD M
Art Unit
2119
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Hoffman Enclosures Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
233 granted / 340 resolved
+13.5% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
375
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
78.2%
+38.2% vs TC avg
§102
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
§112
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 340 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim(s) 1-20 is/are pending. Claim(s) 1 and 12 is/are independent. Priority Applicant’s claim for the benefit of a prior-filed application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) is acknowledged. The prior-filed application is U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/383,939 (filed on 11/16/2022). Information Disclosure Statement The references cited in the information disclosure statement(s) (IDS) submitted on 9/18/2024 and 12/13/2024 have been considered by the examiner. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant's cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Edwards et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 9,861,013) (hereinafter “Edwards”). Regarding method claim 1 and corresponding portion of machine claim 12, Edwards teaches a method of controlling a first pump in a coolant distribution unit for cooling electronic components, (Fig. 3, 4 - - coolant pump used to distribute coolant is controlled using electronic system) the method comprising: setting a control priority to a first value indicative of a client mode in which a first local controller generates a first speed signal for the first pump in response to an instruction received from a master controller; (Col. 17 Lines 11-40 - - control is set for speed of pump in response to controller instruction) determining a first interval since a last communication from the master controller; (Col. 17 Lines 11-40 - - period, i.e. interval, is determined) and if the first interval exceeds a preset dead time, setting the control priority of the first local controller to a second value indicative of an autonomous mode in which the first local controller generates the first speed signal for the first pump based on one or more parameters stored in a memory of the first local controller. (Col. 17 Lines 11-40 - - when period, i.e. interval, expires, i.e. exceeds a preset dead time, controller automatically controls pump using speed signal, i.e. control priority is set to autonomous mode) Regarding method claim 2, Edwards teaches generating, at the first local controller, a second speed signal based on a target speed. (Col. 17 Lines 11-40 - - control is set for speed of pump in response to controller instruction) Regarding method claim 3, Edwards teaches determining that the first pump is a passive pump, and, when the first interval exceeds the preset dead time, generating, at the first local controller, a third speed signal to reduce a speed of the first pump. (Col. 17 Lines 11-40 - - when period, i.e. interval, expires, i.e. exceeds a preset time, controller automatically controls pump using speed signal; Col. 19 Lines 21-37 - - where pump speed is decreased, i.e. reduced) Regarding method claim 4, Edwards teaches providing a first pump cassette, including the first local controller, the first pump, a first pump drive, and at least one peripheral electronic device. (Fig. 5A - - pump mechanism including controller, pump, drive and peripheral device, is used) Regarding method claim 5, Edwards teaches wherein the at least one peripheral electronic device includes a fan. (Fig. 5A - - fans 510 are used) Regarding method claim 6, Edwards teaches wherein the first pump cassette includes a first power button. (Col. 17 Lines 11-40 - - pump is turned on or off, i.e. using power button/switch) Regarding method claim 7, Edwards teaches providing a second pump cassette including a second local controller, a second pump, and a second pump drive; receiving a power button signal indicating a depression of the first power button; generating, at the master controller, responsive to the power button signal, a first ramp instruction to increase a first speed of the first pump; sending the first ramp instruction to the first local controller; generating, at the master controller, responsive to the power button signal, a second ramp instruction to decrease a second speed of the second pump; and sending the second ramp instruction to the second local controller. (Fig. 5A - - multiple pump mechanisms can be used, including second controller/pumps 335’ connected to controllers 530 and power button) Regarding method claim 8, Edwards teaches removing the second pump cassette while the first pump of the first pump cassette continues to operate in the autonomous mode. (Col. 9 Line 53 – Col. 10 Line 13 - - components can be removed while remaining system continues to operate) Regarding method claim 9 and corresponding machine claim 14, Edwards teaches wherein communication between the master controller and the first local controller and the second local controller adheres to a Modbus protocol. (Col. 20 Lines 45-58 - - network communication is used, where communication includes adhering to communication protocol) Regarding method claim 10, Edwards teaches controlling the first pump in a reservoir pump unit of a liquid to air coolant distribution unit. (Col. 5 Lines 41-61 - - liquid coolant to air cooling is used) Regarding method claim 11 and corresponding machine claim 20, Edwards teaches setting the control priority of the first local controller to the second value indicative of the autonomous mode when an emergency loss of at least one of communication or power occurs. (Col. 16 Lines 36-59 - - control is set when loss of pump occurs) Regarding machine claim 12, Edwards teaches a reservoir pump unit for use in a coolant distribution unit for cooling electrical components, the reservoir pump unit including a controller slot receiving a master controller, the master controller being configured for toolless removal from the controller slot; a first cassette bay receiving a first pump cassette, the first pump cassette including a first pump and a first local controller, (Fig. 5A - - multiple pump mechanisms can be used, including second controller/pumps 335’ connected to controllers 530 and power button) where the rest correspond to method claim 1 above. Regarding machine claim 13, Edwards teaches a second cassette bay receiving a second pump cassette, the second pump cassette including a second pump and a second local controller, wherein the first pump cassette includes a power button; and when the power button is depressed, the master controller generates a first ramp instruction to increase a speed of the first pump and a second ramp instruction to decrease a second speed of the second pump. (Fig. 5A - - multiple pump mechanisms can be used, including second controller/pumps 335’ connected to controllers 530 and power button) Regarding machine claim 15, Edwards teaches wherein, when the first local controller is in the client mode, the first local controller receives an instruction from the master controller to implement a first of a plurality of operating modes. (Col. 6 Lines 3-27 - - pump depends on mode, i.e. multiple modes are used) Regarding machine claim 16, Edwards teaches wherein the first pump cassette includes a locking system to engage a locking mechanism of the reservoir pump unit to selectively lock or unlock the first pump cassette relative to the reservoir pump unit. (Col. 6 Lines 3-27 - - quick connect couplings, i.e. locking/unlocking mechanisms, are used) Regarding machine claim 17, Edwards teaches wherein the locking system is in electrical communication with the first local controller. (Col. 6 Lines 3-27 - - electrical communication is performed between mechanisms) Regarding machine claim 18, Edwards teaches wherein the coolant distribution unit includes at least one fan. (Fig. 5A - - fans 510 are used) Regarding machine claim 19, Edwards teaches wherein the reservoir pump unit is installed in a liquid to air coolant distribution unit including a plurality of fans. (Col. 5 Lines 41-61 - - liquid coolant to air cooling is used; Fig. 5A - - fans 510 are used) It is noted that any citations to specific, pages, columns, lines, or figures in the prior art references and any interpretation of the reference should not be considered to be limiting in any way. A reference is relevant for all it contains and may be relied upon for all that it would have reasonably suggested to one having ordinary skill in the art. See MPEP 2123. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Saad M. Kabir whose telephone number is 571-270-0608 (direct fax number is 571-270-9933). The examiner can normally be reached on Mondays to Fridays 9am to 5pm EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mohammad Ali can be reached on 571-272-4105. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAAD M KABIR/ Examiner, Art Unit 2119 /MOHAMMAD ALI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2119
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 16, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12646941
METHOD FOR QUANTIFYING AND ASSESSING SCHEDULING RISK AND APPARATUS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12644463
ADAPTIVE CAPACITOR SECTION FOR FAN SPEED CONTROL
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12640586
Optimum Utilization of Electric Circuit Capacity by Adding Electric Vehicle Charging
5y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12626310
ENHANCING DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM RESILIENCY USING TRANSACTIVE MECHANISMS
4y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12620039
Governance Engines for Energy- and Power-Related Facilities and Systems
2y 10m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+23.6%)
3y 3m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 340 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month