Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/512,866

Battery Replacement Apparatus and Method

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 17, 2023
Priority
Dec 05, 2022 — JP 2022-194387
Examiner
KIM, PAUL D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
1367 granted / 1559 resolved
+27.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
63 currently pending
Career history
1613
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
37.6%
-2.4% vs TC avg
§102
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
§112
32.4%
-7.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1559 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hozumi et al. (PGPub 2012/0233850 A1) in view of Di Pietrantonio et al. (PGPub 2018/0179037 A1). Hozumi et al. teach a battery replacement apparatus for replacing a used first battery attached to a vehicle body of an electrically powered vehicle with a charged second battery, the battery replacement apparatus comprising: a battery replacement station (11, Fig. 1) including a floor (12) on which the electrically powered vehicle (41) can be stopped, and in which removal of the first battery (42) from the vehicle body and attachment of the second battery (42) to the vehicle body are performed (paragraph [0023]); and a battery mounting table (13, Fig. 1) on which the first battery and the second battery can be mounted, the battery mounting table being movable below the electrically powered vehicle in a vertical direction as shown in Fig. 1 (paragraph [0026]). However, Hozumi et al. silent a raising and lowering unit movable below the electrically powered vehicle in the vertical direction independently of the battery mounting table, wherein the raising and lowering unit is movable between a raised position to which at least a part of the electrically powered vehicle has been moved upward from the floor. Di Pietrantonio et al. teach a battery replacement apparatus for replacing a used first battery attached to a vehicle body of an electrically powered vehicle including a raising and lowering unit (4-7, Fig. 3) movable below the electrically powered vehicle in the vertical direction as shown in Fig. 5, wherein the raising and lowering unit is movable between a raised position to which at least a part of the electrically powered vehicle has been moved upward from the floor as shown in Fig. 7 (paragraphs [0019]-[0024]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time of the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made, to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify a battery replacement apparatus for replacing a used first battery attached to a vehicle body of an electrically powered vehicle of Hozumi et al. by a raising and lowering unit movable below the electrically powered vehicle in the vertical direction as taught by Di Pietrantonio et al. so that the battery mounting table is optimized to move up to a desired position where the battery mounting table contacts a bottom surface of the first battery when the raising and lowering unit is located at the raised position. Re. claim 4: Hozumi et al., modified by Di Pietrantonio et al., teach a battery replacement method for replacing a used first battery attached to a vehicle body of an electrically powered vehicle with a charged second battery, comprising steps of: a lifting step of lifting the electrically powered vehicle by a raising and lowering unit, such that at least a part of the electrically powered vehicle is moved upward from a floor, the raising and lowering unit being capable of moving below the electrically powered vehicle in a vertical direction (Figs. 3-7 in Di Pietrantonio et al.); a raising step of raising a battery mounting table, such that the battery mounting table contacts a bottom surface of the first battery in a state where the electrically powered vehicle is lifted by the raising and lowering unit, the battery mounting table being capable of moving in the vertical direction independently of the raising and lowering unit (Figs. 4A-4D); and a removing step of removing the first battery from the vehicle body in a state in which the battery mounting table contacts the bottom surface of the first battery as shown in Figs. 4A-4D(paragraphs [0038]-[0039]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 and 3 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAUL D KIM whose telephone number is (571)272-4565. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday: 6:00 AM-2:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas Hong can be reached at 571-272-0993. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PAUL D KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3729
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 17, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707616
TAPE LOADING DEVICE
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700782
Positioning Device and Method for Positioning Wire Ends in the Manufacture of an Electrical Machine
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700624
DISASSEMBLY MECHANISM, DISASSEMBLY SYSTEM FOR POWER BATTERY PACK WITH DISASSEMBLY MECHANISM AND DISASSEMBLY METHOD OF POWER BATTERY PACK
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700780
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING STATOR
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700539
VERTICALLY-STACKED INTERDIGITATED METAL-INSULATOR-METAL CAPACITOR FOR SUB-20 NM PITCH
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+6.7%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1559 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month