Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 18/513,385

CANCELLATION OF SPURIOUS INTERMODULATION PRODUCTS PRODUCED IN NONLINEAR CHANNELS BY FREQUENCY HOPPED SIGNALS AND SPURIOUS SIGNALS

Final Rejection §101§DP
Filed
Nov 17, 2023
Priority
May 27, 2015 — provisional 62/167,072 +4 more
Examiner
YUN, EUGENE
Art Unit
2648
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Finesse Wireless LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
847 granted / 991 resolved
+23.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1023
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.1%
+9.1% vs TC avg
§102
31.1%
-8.9% vs TC avg
§112
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 991 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-20 of prior U.S. Patent No. 9,998,158. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Claims 1-20 are identical to claims 1-20 of the patent. The only very slight difference is that the claims in the patent state Intermodulation Products to state what IMP stands for. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EUGENE YUN whose telephone number is (571)272-7860. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wesley Kim can be reached at 5712727867. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EUGENE YUN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 17, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §DP
Feb 18, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 23, 2026
Final Rejection — §101, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12615662
MAIN BODY DEVICE, METHOD OF CONTROLLING MAIN BODY DEVICE, OPERATION DEVICE, METHOD OF CONTROLLING OPERATION DEVICE, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
3y 5m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12607221
HINGE STRUCTURE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12610329
ADJUSTING A CLIENT DEVICE RECEIVER PARAMETER, AND RELATED DEVICES, METHODS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS
2y 6m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12593218
SPECTRUM INQUIRY METHOD AND DEVICE FOR AUTOMATIC FREQUENCY COORDINATION PROTOCOL
2y 4m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587234
ONLINE LEARNING OF TRANSMISSION PHASE CONTROL FOR A COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE THAT COMMUNICATES VIA INDUCTIVE COUPLING
3y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+4.1%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 991 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month