Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/513,403

MUTE HINGE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 17, 2023
Examiner
SULLIVAN, MATTHEW J
Art Unit
3677
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allow Rate
670 granted / 1064 resolved
+11.0% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1106
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
46.4%
+6.4% vs TC avg
§102
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
§112
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1064 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 9/10/15 has been entered. Claim Interpretation Examiner notes that the amended claim language requires a broader interpretation of the limitation “enclosing” (see lines 9 and 14). The limitation will be interpreted in light of the specification as being consistent with the embodiment of figs. 8-9 rather than one of several available definitions which require complete surrounding or closing in on all sides. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2 and 15-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kennerly, U.S. Patent 10,316,559 in view of Chiu, U.S. Patent Application Publication. Regarding Claim 1, Kennerly teaches: two fixing leaves (102, 104); each one of the fixing leaves including: at least one knuckle (112a-c, 114a-b); a pin (108) mounted through the at least one knuckle of each one of the fixing leaves (see figs. 1-3)… ...at least one plastic element (see 110, 106a-d, see Col 3, Lns 35-41) enclosing the pin and located between the pin and the at least one knuckle of the fixing leaves (see fig. 3); the at least one plastic element including multiple said plastic elements (see 110, 106a-d), Kennerly does not teach: the pin including: a plurality of large sections and a plurality of small sections, a diameter of each one of the large sections being larger than a diameter of each one of the small sections; the large sections and the small sections staggered… …each one of the plastic elements enclosing one of the small sections; an outer diameter of each one of the plastic elements being larger than the diameter of the large section. Chiu teaches: a pin (11, 16) including: a plurality of large sections (14) and a plurality of small sections (see below), a diameter of each one of the large sections being larger than a diameter of each one of the small sections (see fig. 4); the large sections and the small sections staggered (see fig. 4)… elements (see 21) enclosing one of the small sections (see fig. 4); an outer diameter of each one of the plastic elements being larger than the diameter of the large section (see fig. 4, and note voids between pin (11, 16) and knuckle (31). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to provide Kennerly with the plurality of large and small sections on the pin and to replace the sleeve of Kennerly with multiple plastic elements such as small bushings, washers or ringlets enclosing the small sections and having a diameter larger than that of the large pin sections because that would reduce the material cost by reducing the volume of PTFE plastic used and this would maintain the separation between the pin and knuckle to prevent metal on metal contact (see Kennerly Abstract). Examiner notes that Applicant’s disclosure teaches a sleeve (fig. 2, element 30) in addition to multiple plastic elements (22b) and the embodiments present obvious variants of one another rather than separate inventions. Regarding Claim 2, Kennerly teaches: a cap (see below) mounted at an end of the pin and thereby the at least one knuckle of each one of the fixing leaves clamped by the cap and the pin. PNG media_image1.png 217 302 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding Claims 15-16, in the instant combination Kennerly-Chiu would satisfy the limitations of these claims because Chiu teaches elements clamped by adjacent large sections (see fig. 4) and it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to include these features of Chiu because this would maintain the multiple plastic elements in the proper position within the knuckles along the pin. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW J SULLIVAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5218. The examiner can normally be reached IFP, Typically M-Th, 8:00-6:00, regular Fr availability. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason San can be reached at 571-272-6531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /M.J.S/Examiner, Art Unit 3677 /JASON W SAN/SPE, Art Unit 3677
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 17, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 13, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 10, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 29, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Sep 04, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 15, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601212
VEHICLE DOOR HINGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601211
Hinge for a Flap of a Motor Vehicle
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599232
FURNITURE BODY HAVING A FRONT PANEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601213
ARRANGEMENTS FOR CLOSING ACCESS MEMBER, AND ACCESS MEMBER SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590483
GUIDE DEVICE FOR GUIDING A FURNITURE PART
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+22.3%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1064 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month