Office Action Predictor
Application No. 18/513,773

Rail System For An Outdoor Shelter

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 20, 2023
Examiner
HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Sunjoy Industries Group LTD.
OA Round
6 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
6-7
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

61%
Career Allow Rate
948 granted / 1543 resolved
Without
With
+22.1%
Interview Lift
avg trend
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
63 pending
1606
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
41.2%
+1.2% vs TC avg
§102
34.8%
-5.2% vs TC avg
§112
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 11/3/2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 2, 7, 10, and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhao in US Publication 2007/0017646 in view of Kennedy et al in US Patent 1061547 and Halley in US Patent 8640420. Regarding Claims 1, 2, 10, and 11, Zhao teaches an outdoor shelter, comprising: a plurality of corner support members disposed at respective corners of the outdoor shelter, the plurality of corner support members comprising a first corner support member (A, see below) and a second corner support (C) member disposed at a first longitudinal end of the outdoor shelter, the plurality of corner support members further comprising a third corner support member (B) and a fourth corner support member (D) disposed at a second longitudinal end of the outdoor shelter; a plurality of peripheral beam members, a first one (E) of the plurality of peripheral beam members configured to extend in a longitudinal direction of the outdoor shelter between the first and third corner support members, a second one (H) of the plurality of peripheral beam members configured to extend in a transverse direction of the outdoor shelter between the first and second corner support members, a third one (G) of the plurality of peripheral beam members configured to extend in the longitudinal direction of the outdoor shelter between the second and fourth corner support members, a fourth one (J) of the plurality of peripheral beam members configured to extend in the transverse direction of the outdoor shelter between the third and fourth corner support members, the first one of the plurality of peripheral beam members being spaced apart from the third one of the plurality of peripheral beam members, and the second one of the plurality of peripheral beam members being spaced apart from the fourth one of the plurality of peripheral beam members; a plurality of upper beam members, at least one of the upper beam members (5) configured to be supported on top surfaces of the spaced-apart first and third ones of the plurality of peripheral beam members; and a shade member (4), the shade member disposed above at least one of the first and second ones of the plurality of peripheral beam members. PNG media_image1.png 569 611 media_image1.png Greyscale Zhao is silent on the use of curved peripheral beam members. Kennedy teaches am outdoor shelter including a first and a third peripheral beam member (7 on each outer side of the device) and second and fourth peripheral beam members (2 on each end of the device) wherein the first one of the plurality of peripheral beam members has a curved configuration such that a center portion of the first one of the plurality of peripheral beam members is disposed higher than end portions of the first one of the plurality of peripheral beam members and the third one of the plurality of peripheral beam members has a curved configuration such that a center portion of the third one of the plurality of peripheral beam members is disposed higher than end portions of the third one of the plurality of peripheral beam members. Kennedy further teaches a shade member (1) positioned atop the peripheral members the shade member being formed from a continuous fabric material, the shade member disposed above at least one of the first and second ones of the plurality of peripheral beam members, the shade member having a first side edge and (toward the leftmost peripheral beam) a second side edge (toward the rightmost peripheral beam), a first end edge (A, see below), a second end edge (B), the second side edge of the shade member being oppositely disposed relative to the first side edge of the shade member, and the second ends edge of the shade member being oppositely disposed relative to the first end edge of the shade member; wherein the first end portion of the at least one of the upper beam members is configured to protrude outwardly beyond the first side edge of the shade member, wherein each of the first end edge and the second end edge of the shade member is disposed beneath the bottom surface of the at least one of the upper beam members, the first end portion of the at least one of the upper beam members is configured to protrude outwardly beyond a side surface of the first one of the plurality of peripheral beam members, and the shade member is folded over the first one of the plurality of peripheral beam members at a first end of the outdoor shelter, and the shade member is folded over the second one of the plurality of peripheral beam members at a second end of the outdoor shelter (see Fig. 2). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the peripheral beam members of Zhao by using curved peripheral beam members as taught by Kennedy in order to increase the headroom under the shade member for the user. PNG media_image2.png 373 669 media_image2.png Greyscale Zhao, as modified, is silent on the attachment between the upper beams and the peripheral beams. Halley teaches an outdoor shelter, comprising: a plurality of corner support members (104) disposed at respective corners of the outdoor shelter, a plurality of peripheral beam members (106), a plurality of upper beam members (108), at least one of the upper beam members configured to be supported on top surfaces of the spaced-apart first (the leftmost peripheral beam) and third (the rightmost peripheral beam) ones of the plurality of peripheral beam members, the at least one of the upper beam members having a top surface and a bottom surface, the bottom surface of the at least one of the upper beam members being oppositely disposed relative to the top surface of the at least one of the upper beam members (see Fig. 8), and spaced-apart portions of the bottom surface of the at least one of the upper beam members configured to rest on the top surfaces of the spaced-apart first and third ones of the plurality of peripheral beam members (see Fig. 8), and the at least one of the upper beam members having a first end portion (the end of 152 at one end) and a second end portion (the end of 152 at the opposite end), the second end portion of the at least one of the upper beam members being oppositely disposed relative to the first end portion of the at least one of the upper beam members. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the upper beam members of Zhao, as modified, by using top-mounted upper beam members with overhangs as taught by Halley in order to provide a stable and structurally sound frame for the shelter. Regarding Claim 7, Zhao, as modified, teaches a guide rail member (6) coupled to one of the plurality of corner support members. Claims 3 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhao, as modified, as applied to Claim 1 above in view of Terrels in US Publication 2004/0025460. Zhao, as modified, is silent on the use of ground plates on the corner support members. Terrels teaches a ground stake plate (50) having at least one fastener aperture (54) and at least one ground stake aperture (51) formed therein, the at least one fastener aperture being disposed through a raised portion (52) of the ground stake plate, the at least one ground stake aperture being disposed closer to a periphery of the ground stake plate than the at least one fastener aperture, the at least one fastener aperture configured to receive a fastener member (26) for securing the ground stake plate to a bottom end of one of a plurality of corner support members (20), and the at least one ground stake aperture configured to receive a ground stake (55) for securing the one of the plurality of corner support members to the ground, further comprising at least one ground plate cover member (60) configured to be disposed over a peripheral portion of the at least one ground stake plate so as to at least partially conceal the peripheral portion of the at least one ground stake plate from view, the at least one ground plate cover member having a central aperture formed therethrough for accommodating a passage of the corner support member through the ground plate cover member. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the corner supports of Zhao, as modified, by adding ground stake plates as taught by Terrels in order to securely affix the shelter to the ground on which it is erected. Claims 5 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhao, as modified, as applied to Claim 1 above in view of Nelson in US Patent 2948288. Zhao, as modified, is silent on the use of a shade support pole. Nelson teaches a shade (14) and at least one shade support pole member (20) coupled to an end portion of the shade member of the outdoor shelter and that the end portion of the shade member is looped (at 18) so as to form a longitudinal cavity for receiving the at least one shade support pole member. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Zhao, as modified, by adding a shade support pole as taught by Terrels in order to allow the user to easily move the shade between open and closed positions. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhao, as modified, as applied to Claim 1 above in view of Geraud in CH 635393. Zhao, as modified, is silent on the structure of the peripheral beam member. Geraud teaches an outdoor shelter with a peripheral beam member (12) comprising a first longitudinal beam section (12) coupled to a second longitudinal beam (12/13) section by a longitudinal beam connector (25) member that is slidingly received within inner end portions of the first and second longitudinal beam sections (see Fig. 4). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Zhao, as modified, by using a two-part peripheral beam member as taught by Geraud in order to provide a more-compactly manufactured device, and to place the joint of the beam beneath an upper beam member in order to reinforce the device in a place of load. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 11/3/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 10, and 11 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Neither Zhao nor Halley are currently relied upon to teach the newly added features of the shade member. Kennedy clearly teaches all of the newly added features of the shade member and the applicant presents no arguments directed to the shade member of the Kennedy reference. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NOAH C. HAWK whose telephone number is (571)272-1480. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am to 5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Dunn can be reached at 5712726670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. NOAH C. HAWK Primary Examiner Art Unit 3636 /Noah Chandler Hawk/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 20, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 20, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 17, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 17, 2024
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 24, 2024
Response Filed
Nov 05, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Feb 20, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 20, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 05, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 10, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 25, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 25, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 25, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 02, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Oct 31, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 31, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 03, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 09, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 12, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 12, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 24, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 05, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12582571
MOBILITY SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575998
CRUTCH WITH A CONTOURED GRIP AND A FOREARM SUPPORT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575651
Umbrella
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569041
Wind-Resistance Reducing Canopy Structure for Umbrella
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12571230
VEHICLE ROOFTOP TENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

6-7
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+22.1%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1543 resolved cases by this examiner