Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/516,789

FRONT PILLAR STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 21, 2023
Priority
Jan 13, 2023 — JP 2023-004084
Examiner
COLILLA, DANIEL JAMES
Art Unit
3612
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
817 granted / 1210 resolved
+15.5% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1250
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
64.6%
+24.6% vs TC avg
§102
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
§112
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1210 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Maeda (US 4,886,314) in view of Sakyo et al. (US 2001/0005092). With respect to claim 1, Maeda discloses the claimed front pillar structure except for the an outer bulkhead joined to the front pillar outer panel so as to configure a closed cross-sectional shape with the front pillar outer panel, and disposed between the front pillar outer panel and the front pillar inner panel; and the an inner bulkhead that is joined to the front pillar inner panel so as to configure a closed cross-sectional shape with the front pillar inner panel, and that is disposed between the front pillar outer panel and the front pillar inner panel, and at a vehicle rearward side of the outer bulkhead, so as to overlap with the outer bulkhead in a vehicle width direction. Maeda discloses a front pillar structure 6, comprising: a front pillar outer panel having an outer flange part at a vehicle forward side and a vehicle rearward side as shown below in the image taken from Fig. 8 of Maeda: [AltContent: textbox (front pillar inner panel)][AltContent: ] [AltContent: textbox (cowl top side panel)][AltContent: ][AltContent: ][AltContent: textbox (front pillar )][AltContent: textbox (front panel outer panel)][AltContent: ] PNG media_image1.png 292 356 media_image1.png Greyscale a front pillar inner panel having an inner flange part joined to the outer flange part at each of the vehicle forward side and the vehicle rearward side (as shown above); and a cowl top side panel disposed at a vehicle forward side of the front pillar outer panel (as shown above). Sakyo et al. disclose a similar front pillar structure 3A comprising: a front pillar outer panel 8 having an outer flange part at a vehicle forward side and a vehicle rearward side (as shown in Fig. 14 of Sakyo et al.); a front pillar inner panel 7 having an inner flange part joined to the outer flange part at each of the vehicle forward side and the vehicle rearward side (as shown in Fig. 14 of Sakyo et al.); an outer bulkhead 36 joined to the front pillar outer panel 8 so as to configure a closed cross-sectional shape with the front pillar outer panel (as shown in Fig. 14 of Sakyo et al.), and disposed between the front pillar outer panel 8 and the front pillar inner panel 7; an inner bulkhead 35 that is joined to the front pillar inner panel 7 so as to configure a closed cross-sectional shape with the front pillar inner panel, and that is disposed between the front pillar outer panel 8 and the front pillar inner panel 7, and at a vehicle rearward side of the outer bulkhead 36 (as shown in Fig. 14 of Sakyo et al.), so as to overlap with the outer bulkhead in a vehicle width direction (as shown in Fig. 14 of Sakyo et al.). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains, with a reasonable expectation of success, to combine the teaching of Sakyo et al. with the front pillar structure disclosed by Maeda for the advantage of providing additional strength and rigidity to the front pillar. With respect to claim 2, Sakyo et al. disclose that the outer bulkhead 36 configures a closed cross-sectional shape with the front pillar outer panel 8 in plan view (as shown in Fig. 14 of Sakyo et al.), and the inner bulkhead 35 configures a closed cross-sectional shape with the front pillar inner panel 7 in plan view (as show in Fig. 14 of Sakyo et al.). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Tsuneyama and Kim are cited to show other examples of front pillars with inner and outer bulkheads. Balzar, Mori, and Aul are cited to show other examples of vehicle pillars with two bulkheads inside a pillar outer panel and pillar inner panel. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL J COLILLA whose telephone number is (571)272-2157. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30 - 4:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amy Weisberg can be reached at 571-270-5500. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Daniel J Colilla/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 21, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 09, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637149
Off-Road Vehicles having a Forwardly Tiltable Cargo Bed
3y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637013
CENTER CONSOLE AND FRONT SEAT ASSEMBLY FOR A VEHICLE
2y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630067
CARGO SHELF FOR DELIVERY VEHICLE
2y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623337
AUTOMATED CONVEYANCE SYSTEM
3y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12623522
REAR HARD ENCLOSURE FOR A SOFT TOP
2y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+22.2%)
2y 8m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1210 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month