Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 15, 2026
Application No. 18/518,016

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR STRANDED-LESS POWER DATACENTERS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 22, 2023
Examiner
PARRIES, DRU M
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
394 granted / 623 resolved
-4.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
656
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
91.2%
+51.2% vs TC avg
§102
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
§112
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 623 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 8, 12-14, and 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Corhodzic (EP 3 937 326 A1). Regarding independent claims 1, 14, and 19, and dependent claims 12 and 18, Corhodzic teaches a datacenter power system and method of power management (Fig. 1) comprising: a grid connection (via 110) configured to receive grid electrical power (from 102) at a grid voltage, a grid amperage, and a grid frequency; a plurality of co-locations (142, 144, 146), each co-location including a plurality of computing devices (datacenters); a solid-state transformer (inside 112, 114, 130) in electrical communication with the grid connection and configured to convert the grid electrical power to co- location electrical power having a co-location voltage different from the grid voltage and a co-location amperage different from the grid amperage ([0023], [0034], [0035]); a superconducting cable (140 or 162/164) providing electrical communication of the co- location electrical power from the solid-state transformer to the co- location ([0037], [0038]); and a plurality of branch conduits (140 from 130 to 142/144/146) from the superconducting cable that provide electrical communication to the plurality of co-locations. Regarding claims 2 and 17, Corhodzic teaches the co-location electrical power has a co-location frequency (a DC signal) different from the grid frequency (an AC signal). Regarding claims 3 and 20, Corhodzic teaches the superconducting cable/branch conduits includes a high-temperature superconductor ([0032]). Regarding claim 8, Corhodzic teaches the superconducting cable electrically connects the solid-state transformer directly to the co-location ([0037]). Regarding claim 13, Corhodzic teaches the solid-state transformer is a first solid-state transformer of a plurality of solid-state transformers (inside 112, 114, 130; [0023], [0031]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4-7, 9-11, 15, and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Corhodzic (EP 3 937 326 A1). Corhodzic teaches the datacenter power system and method of power management as described above. Regarding claims 4-7, 15, and 16, Corhodzic teaches the grid voltage being a high voltage, and the idea of converting the grid voltage and grid amperage via first and second transformers (inside 112, 130, and 152/154/156) into various other voltage and amperage levels (i.e. a middle voltage and a co-location voltage and amperage) ([0034], [0035], [0038]). Corhodzic fails to explicitly teach the co-location voltage and amperage being in the claimed ranges. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the co-location voltage be no more than 48 (or 120) Volts and the co-location amperage be at least 200,000 A, since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art. In re Aller, 105 USPQ 233. Regarding claims 9-11, Corhodzic teaches an uninterruptable power supply (at 152/154/156) electrically between the solid-state transformer (at 130) and the superconducting cable (162/164) ([0037]). Corhodzic fails to explicitly teach the type of UPS at the substations (152/154/156). However, the Examiner takes Official Notice that generator and/or DC uninterruptible power supplies are known in the power distribution art. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to substitute a generator or DC uninterruptible power supply into the substations in Corhodzic’s invention, since it involves a mere simple substitution of one type of UPS for another to perform the same function of providing uninterruptible power to the datacenters. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DRU M PARRIES whose telephone number is (571)272-8542. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday -Thursday from 9:00am to 6:00pm. The examiner can also be reached on alternate Fridays. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Rexford Barnie, can be reached on 571-272-7492. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). DMP 3/25/2026 /DANIEL KESSIE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 22, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12658696
DC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12640564
MOVING AND STORING ENERGY BETWEEN UTILITY'S ENERGY DELIVERY NETWORKS
1y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640592
POWER SUPPLY DEVICE
1y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12583335
APPARATUS COMPRISING AN INVERTER
2y 2m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587030
POWER SUPPLY SWITCHING SYSTEM AND SWITCH APPARATUS
1y 7m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+12.8%)
3y 3m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 623 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month