Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/518,102

METHOD OF OPERATING A BIOPROCESS ARRANGEMENT TO PERFORM AT LEAST ONE REPETITION OF A BIOPROCESS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 22, 2023
Examiner
ORTIZ RODRIGUEZ, CARLOS R
Art Unit
2119
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Sartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
549 granted / 715 resolved
+21.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
751
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
§103
36.5%
-3.5% vs TC avg
§102
32.9%
-7.1% vs TC avg
§112
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 715 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-20 are pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Specifically, claim 1 recites the term “the replaceable electronic components” throughout the claim. It is not clear if this term is referring back to the previously recited term “at least one replaceable electronic component”. It can be noted that term “at least one replaceable electronic component”. Claim language consistency throughout the claim is important to avoid confusion when interpreting the claim. Claim 1 Lines 16-17, recites the term “the presence”. Claim 12 Line 4, recites the term “the Modbus 8N1 serial format”. Claim 15 Lines 2-3, recites the term “the same time”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 1 Line 26, recites the term “thereby”. It is not clear what feature/limitation this term is referring back to. Claim 2 Line 3, Claim 3 Line 6, Claim 14 Line 6, recites the term “in particular”. The meaning of this term in the claim is not clear. This term renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the invention functions only with the features/components following this term. Claim 10 Line 3, Claim 11 Line 3, Claim 15 Line 2, recites the term “several”. The scope/limits of this term/limitation is not clear. Regarding claim 17, it is not clear what components/parts are part of the claimed electronic component. Regarding claim 18, it is not clear what components/parts are part of the claimed system. Claim 20 Line 1, starts with the term “Method”. It seems to be that it should start with term “The method”, in order avoid confusion regarding what claim it is referring back to. A better claim interpretation and prior art search will be possible when said deficiencies are corrected. Citation of Pertinent Prior Art The following prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: 1. González, Isaías, et al. "Integration of sensors, controllers and instruments using a novel OPC architecture." Sensors 17.7 (2017): 1512. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CARLOS R ORTIZ RODRIGUEZ whose telephone number is (571)272-3766. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri 10:00 am- 6:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mohammad Ali can be reached on 571-272-4105. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CARLOS R ORTIZ RODRIGUEZ/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2119
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 22, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596360
DATA-REDUCED EDGE-TO-CLOUD TRANSMISSION BASED ON PREDICTION MODELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585265
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROACTIVE HANDLING OF MULTIPLE FAULTS AND FAILURE MODES IN AN ELECTRICAL NETWORK OF ENERGY ASSETS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12547164
ABNORMALITY DETECTION APPARATUS, COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, AND ABNORMALITY DETECTION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12535808
REAL-TIME CALIBRATION FOR DETAILED DIGITAL TWINS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12530020
DEPLOYING CONTAINERS TO ADJUST INDUSTRIAL DEVICE OPERATIONS BASED ON EVENT DATA CONTEXTUALIZED WITH RESPECT TO HIERARCHICAL DATASETS OF AN INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+10.4%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 715 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month