Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/518,191

RADIO-FREQUENCY SYSTEM AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Nov 22, 2023
Priority
May 24, 2021 — CN 202110563963.2 +1 more
Examiner
BILODEAU, DAVID
Art Unit
2648
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
579 granted / 755 resolved
+14.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
781
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
78.6%
+38.6% vs TC avg
§102
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
§112
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 755 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to the Applicants’ communication filed on 04/29/2026. In virtue of this communication, claims 1-7 and 9-21 are currently pending in the instant application. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 04/29/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The Applicant argues in part stating that “The applicant submits that, the features "the first transceiving channel and the second transceiving channel are independent from each other" recited in amended claim 1 means that "the first transceiving channel TRXO and the second transceiving channel TRXI are independent from each other in hardware. No connection or coupling in hardware exists between the first transceiving channel TRXO and the second transceiving channel TRXI." (See para. 0036 of the present application)” and “With reference to FIG. 1 of Liu, the first transmitting module 22 and the first receiving module 23 are both connected to the first DPDT switch 21, thereby enabling the first transmitting module 22 and the first receiving module 23 to be connected to either the first antenna ANT1 or the second antenna ANT2, respectively. Therefore, the first channel including the first transmitting module 22 and the second channel including the first receiving module 23 CAN NEVER be independent from each other.” The Examiner respectfully disagrees. First it is noted that claims require the channels are independent of each other and do not require separate hardware throughout the entire channel (i.e. no overlap at any point). Instant fig. 2 also shows the use of switches 310 and 320 for switching between channels). In Liu a pathway is switched between multiple channels (see e.g. fig. 2 (21) where K1 to a2 is an independent channel from K2 to a1). Next, the Applicant argues “Thus, in case that "the first radio frequency module 2" in Liu is interpreted as the "first transceiving module" of the present application, and "the second radio frequency module 3" in Liu is interpreted as the "second transceiving module 240" of the present application, then the switch of the target transceiving module between the first radio frequency module 2 and the second radio frequency module 3, i.e., the selection of the target transceiving module from the first radio frequency module 2 and the second radio frequency module 3 are achieved through the first DPDT switch 21 located between the first radio frequency module 2 and the antennas ANTI and ANT2, as well as the second DPDT switch 311 located between the second radio frequency module 3 and the antennas ANT3 and ANT4, rather than through "the radio frequency transceiver" as disclosed in amended claim 1 of the present application.” In Liu both radio frequency modules (2 and 3 of fig. 2) are through (i.e. connected to radio frequency transceiver 1) and a combination of these modules and the radio frequency transceiver can be equated to claimed first and second transceivers. Therefore, the arguments are not persuasive. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims -1, 4, 9-10, 12, 15 and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Liu et al. (US 2022/0190870 A1). Regarding Claim 1 Liu teaches the limitations "A radio-frequency system, comprising: (see abstract); a radio-frequency transceiver; and (see fig. 1 (1)); a radio-frequency transceiving circuit, connected to the radio-frequency transceiver, wherein the radio-frequency transceiving circuit comprises a first transceiving channel and a second transceiving channel; (see fig. 1 (2) and par. 0035); the first transceiving channel comprises a first transceiving module, the first transceiving module is connected to a first antenna, the second transceiving channel comprises a second transceiving module, and the second transceiving module is connected to a second antenna; (see fig. 1 (22, 23) and par. 0035-0036, and ant. 1 and ant. 2). wherein one of the first transceiving module and the second transceiving module is switchably configured as a target transceiving module, the target transceiving module and the antenna connected to the target transceiving module are configured to support transmission or primary reception of a target radio-frequency signal, and the other of the first transceiving module and the second transceiving module and the antenna connected thereto are configured to support diversity reception of the target radio-frequency signal" (see fig. 1 (2 and 21) and par. 0033-0037, where DPDT switch 21 switches out first and second transceiver modules for diversity (see par. 0036 “The first receiving module 23 is a receiving module that satisfies receiving functions of the LTE signal frequency band and the 5G signal frequency band.” Also see par. 0039 “4 channels of reception”); wherein the target transceiving module is configured to be switched between the first transceiving module and the second transceiving module by the radio-frequency transceiver, and the first transceiving channel and the second transceiving channel are independent from each other (see fig. 1 and 2 and par. 0035, 0037 and 0039, where the pathways in switches are equated to different channels). Also see par. 0015 showing control module interpreted as part of RF transceiver which controls switching). Claim 12 is rejected for the same reasons set forth above because the claims have similar limitations or have been addressed. Regarding Claim 18 Liu teaches the limitations "A communication device, comprising: (see abstract); a radio-frequency transceiver; and (see fig. 1 (1)); a radio-frequency transceiving circuit, connected to the radio-frequency transceiver, wherein the radio-frequency transceiver circuit comprises a first transceiving channel, a first receiving channel, a second transceiving channel, and a second receiving channel; (see fig. 3 (combination of modules 2 and 3 are equated to the transceiver circuit and have 4 channels) and par. 0047); the first transceiving channel is configured to be selectively connected to one of a first antenna and a third antenna, and the first receiving channel is configured to be selectively connected to the other of the first antenna and the third antenna; (see fig. 4 and par. 0048, showing Switch 21 connecting first and third antennas to first channel); and the second transceiving channel is configured to be selectively connected to one of a second antenna and a fourth antenna, and the second receiving channel is configured to be selectively connected to the other of the second antenna and the fourth antenna; (see fig. 4 and par. 0049 (switch 311 connecting other antennas (i.e. 2nd and 4th) to second transceiver module); wherein the first transceiving channel or the second transceiving channel is configured to be switched by the radio frequency transceiver to (see par. 0015 showing control module interpreted as part of RF transceiver which controls switching) support transmission and primary reception of a target radio-frequency signal, and the transmission and primary reception of the target radio-frequency signal are configured switchable among the first antenna, the second antenna, the third antenna, and the fourth antenna" (See fig. 1 and 4, showing target radio signal configured for transmission and reception on switchable ant1, ant2, ant3, and ant4. Also see par. 0048 and 0050 “In this embodiment, the first switch unit is set as a DPDT switch, and an externally connected 5G transmitting module and two DPDT switches may be configured to perform 2T4R and 1T4R functions of SRS signals...”); and wherein the first transceiving channel and the second transceiving channel are independent from each other (see fig. 1 and 2 and par. 0035, 0037 and 0039, where the pathways in switches are equated to different channels). Regarding Claim 4 Liu teaches the limitations "The radio-frequency system according to claim 1, wherein the radio-frequency transceiver is configured with a first output port, a second output port, a first input port, and a second input port; (see fig. 1 (2) and par. 0037); the first output port is connected to a first transmitting channel of the first transceiving module, and the second output port is connected to a second transmitting channel of the second transceiving module; (see channels from first and second transceiving modules 22 and 23 to ant1 and ant1) and the first input port is connected to a first sub-receiving channel of the first transceiving module, and the second input port is connected to a second sub-receiving channel of the second transceiving module; and (see fig. 4 (input ports from RF transceiver 1); wherein the radio-frequency transceiver further comprises: a first transmitting unit, connected to the first output port, and configured to transmit and process the target radio-frequency signal; a second transmitting unit, connected to the second output port, and configured to transmit and process the target radio-frequency signal; (see fig. 4 where multiple transmitting units transmit and process signals); and a control unit, connected to the first transmitting unit and the second transmitting unit, and configured to determine a target transmitting unit from the first transmitting unit and the second transmitting unit, wherein one of the first transceiving module and the second transceiving module connected to the target transmitting unit is configured as the target transceiving module" (see par. 0012 “controlling the first radio frequency module and the second radio frequency module to transmit a first signal and a second signal respectively; where the first radio frequency module transmits the first signal through a first antenna and a second antenna, and the second radio frequency module transmits the second signal through a third antenna and a fourth antenna.”). Claim 15 is rejected for the same reasons set forth above because the claims have similar limitations or have been addressed. Regarding Claim 9 Liu teaches the limitations "The radio-frequency system according to claim 1, wherein the radio-frequency transceiver circuit further comprising: a first switching unit, wherein the first transceiving module is selectively connected to one of the first antenna and a third antenna through the first switching unit; a first receiving module, selectively connected to the other of the first antenna and the third antenna through the first switching unit, and configured to support receiving processing of a radio- frequency signal; a second switching unit, wherein the second transceiving module is selectively connected to one of the second antenna and a fourth antenna through the second switching unit; and a second receiving module, selectively connected to the other of the second antenna and the fourth antenna through the second switching unit, and configured to support receiving processing of the radio-frequency signal; (see fig. 1 showing first and second switching units which connect 1 of four antennas to RF transceiver); wherein in response to the radio-frequency system being in an LTE working mode or an SA working mode, one of the first antenna, the second antenna, the third antenna and the fourth antenna is switchably configured as a primary antenna for the transmission or primary reception of the target radio-frequency signal" (see fig. 1 and par. 0003 “In the existing 5G architecture design, for example, N41, to perform related functions of N41 standalone (SA) 2T4R (2 channels of transmission and 4 channels of reception) and 1T4R (1 channel of transmission and 4 channels of reception) and non-standalone (NSA) 1T4R, N41 generally requires that 2 new radio (NR) transmitting modules are externally connected.” And par. 0039). Regarding Claim 10 Liu teaches the limitations "The radio-frequency system according to claim 1, further comprising: a first receiving module, connected to a third antenna, and configured to support receiving processing of a first radio-frequency signal and receiving processing of a second radio-frequency signal; and (see fig. 1 (2) and fig. 3 (2) connected to ant1 and ant2); a second receiving module, connected to a fourth antenna, and configured to support receiving processing of the first radio-frequency signal and receiving processing of the second radio-frequency signal; (see fig. 3 (3) second receiving module connected to ant3 and ant4) and wherein in response to the radio-frequency system being in a Non-Standalone (NSA) working mode, the first transceiving module and the first antenna are configured to support transmission and reception of the first radio-frequency signal, and the second transceiving module and the second antenna are configured to support transmission and reception of the second radio-frequency signal; or the first transceiving module and the first antenna are configured to support transmission and reception of the second radio-frequency signal, and the second transceiving module and the second antenna are configured to support transmission and reception of the first radio-frequency signal; wherein communication formats of the first radio-frequency signal and the second radio-frequency signal are different from each other" (see par. 0039 “ Standalone and non-standalone NR bands need to support a technology of 2T4R (2 channels of transmissions and 4 channels of reception) or 1T4R (1 channel of transmission and 4 channels of reception) that transmits SRSs by turns through antennas. 2T4R of SRS signals includes two channels of SRS signals. Because 2T4R of SRS signals includes two channels of SRS signals, optionally, a first channel of SRS signal passes through the first radio frequency module 2 (that is, the LTE radio frequency module) and the first DPDT switch 21, and is sent through ANT1 and ANT2. A second channel of SRS signal passes through the second radio frequency module 3 (that is, the NR radio frequency module) and the first switch unit 31, and is sent through ANT3 and ANT4. In this way, the network radio frequency structure implements 2T4R of SRS signals.”). Regarding Claim 19 Liu teaches the limitations "The communication device according to claim 18, wherein the radio-frequency transceiver circuit further comprising: a first switching unit, wherein the first transceiving channel is selectively connected to one of the first antenna and the third antenna through the first switching unit, and the first receiving channel is selectively connected to the other of the first antenna and the third antenna through the first switching unit; and a second switching unit, wherein the second transceiving channel is selectively connected to one of the second antenna and the fourth antenna through the second switching unit, and the second receiving channel is selectively connected to the other of the second antenna and the fourth antenna through the second switching unit" (see fig. 3 (showing two switching units that connect to ant1-4 and fig. 7 (701) showing control of transmit signal switching and par. 0039. Regarding Claim 20 Liu teaches the limitations "The communication device according to claim 18, wherein the first antenna or the third antenna is configured as a primary antenna for the target radio-frequency signal in response to the first transceiving channel being configured to support the transmission and primary reception of the target radio-frequency signal; or the second antenna or the fourth antenna is configured as a primary antenna for the target radio- frequency signal in response to the second transceiving channel being configured to support the transmission and primary reception of the target radio-frequency signal" (see fig. 0039, fig. 3, 7 and par. 0061-0063 “Control the first radio frequency module and the second radio frequency module to transmit a first signal and a second signal respectively; where the first radio frequency module transmits the first signal through a first antenna and a second antenna, and the second radio frequency module transmits the second signal through a third antenna and a fourth antenna; or control the second radio frequency module to transmit the first signal and the second signal”). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-3, 13-14 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liu as applied to claims 1 and 12, respectfully above, and further in view of Sanchez et al. (US 2014/0187284 A1). Regarding Claim 2 Liu teaches the limitations "The radio-frequency system according to claim 1, wherein a primary antenna is an antenna of the first antenna and the second antenna and is connected to one of the first transceiving module and the second transceiving module, which is currently configured as the target transceiving module; a diversity antenna is the other antenna of the first antenna and the second antenna and is connected to the other of the first transceiving module and the second transceiving module, which is not currently configured as the target transceiving module; and (see fig. 1 (ant1 and ant2, target and diversity) and par. 0037); However, Liu does not explicitly disclose the limitation “ the radio-frequency transceiver is further configured to configure the other of the first transceiving module and the second transceiving module as the target transceiving module in response to received signal quality of the target radio-frequency signal received by the diversity antenna being greater than received signal quality of the target radio- frequency signal received by the primary antenna.” In the same field of endeavor Sanchez teaches a LTE dual antenna system where discloses a mobile device 200 using two antennas 210, 212 and two separate transceivers 211, 213 which may be used depending on different factors such as signal conditions, signal quality indicators, and/or input from device sensors. The present embodiment provides the mobile device 200 with the plurality of antennas 210, 212, a plurality of transmit and receive paths 215, 216, the plurality of radio transceivers 211, 213, a baseband chipset 214, and a switch 217. The switch 217 is configured to change the assignment of antennas to transmission and reception paths. More particularly, in a system with at least two antennas 210, 212 and at least voice traffic and data traffic, the switch 217 may be used to assign the antenna with the best radio frequency (RF) link to the voice traffic, and the other antenna to the data traffic, for example (see abstract, fig. 1 and par. 0025). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to control transmission paths based on RSSI as taught by Sanchez in the system of Liu, in order to improve signal quality (see par. 0004 of Sanchez). Claims 13 and 21 rejected for the same reasons set forth above because the claims have similar limitations or have been addressed. Regarding Claim 3 Liu and Sanchez teach the limitations "The radio-frequency system according to claim 2, wherein the radio-frequency transceiver is further configured to configure the first transceiving module as a default target transceiving module of a radio-frequency signal, and the radio-frequency transceiver is further configured to configure the second transceiving module as the target transceiving module in response to a difference value between signal quality of the radio-frequency signal received by the second transceiving module and signal quality of the radio-frequency signal received by the first transceiving module being greater than a preset threshold" (see Sanchez “If the quality RF link of the second RF link is higher than the quality of the first RF link, the voice transmission signal may be received through the second antenna and the data transmission signal may be received through the first antenna. If the quality RF link of the first RF link is higher than the quality of the second RF link, the voice transmission signal may continue to be received through the first antenna, and the data transmission signal may continue to be received through the second antenna.” Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to control transmission paths based on RSSI threshold (i.e. the corresponding quality of other link) as taught by Sanchez in the system of Liu, in order to improve signal quality (see par. 0004 of Sanchez). Claim 14 is rejected for the same reasons set forth above because the claims have similar limitations or have been addressed. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-7, 11 and 16-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID BILODEAU whose telephone number is (571)270-3192. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 6:00am-4:00pm Eastern Standard Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wesley Kim can be reached at (571) 272-7867. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /David Bilodeau/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 22, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 29, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684426
SILENT REDIAL FOR VIDEO TELEPHONY CALLS
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683652
ANTENNA APPARATUS, SYSTEM, COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, AND PROGRAM
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672190
Message Push Method and Apparatus
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672074
RESTORED COVERAGE UNDER SAS SUSPENSION DUE TO INCUMBENT ACTIVITY IN A CBRS NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671480
CHANNEL INFORMATION ESTIMATION FOR COMMUNICATION NETWORKS WITH META-SURFACES
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+14.5%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 755 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month