Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/519,262

BUS BAR, BUS BAR ASSEMBLY AND BATTERY PACK

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 27, 2023
Priority
May 31, 2023 — CN 202310640809.X +2 more
Examiner
MERKLING, MATTHEW J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
EVE Energy Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
863 granted / 1268 resolved
+8.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
1319
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
78.4%
+38.4% vs TC avg
§102
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
§112
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1268 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Specification The specification and drawings have been reviewed and no clear informalities or objections have been noted. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 3 and 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yang (CN 113764832A with references made to the machine translation attached) in view of Wang (CN 214625320 U with references made to the machine translation attached). Regarding claim 1, Yang discloses a bus bar, applied to a cylindrical power battery module to connect a plurality of rows of cells (20) arranged in a width direction (see Annotated Fig. 5 below which illustrates the width and length of the battery) of the battery module in parallel (see Rows in Fig. 5 which are parallel to each other), wherein the bus bar comprises a plurality of working portions arranged and connected in the width direction of the battery module (see Annotated Fig. 5 below where the working portions are arranged across the width of the battery module), and the plurality of working portions is arranged in one-to-one correspondence with the plurality of rows of cells arranged in the width direction of the battery module (see Fig. 5 where each busbar 10 has working portions tied to a single row (vertical row/column) that are arranged in the width direction); wherein each of the plurality of working portions comprises a positive electrode portion (111) and a negative electrode portion (112) connected to each other (as depicted in Fig. 5 where these portions are connected); the positive electrode portion is connected to a positive terminal of one of two adjacent cells in a length direction of the battery module (as described in lines 172-183 and illustrated in Fig. 5 where positive electrode portion is connected to the positive electrode of one cell); and the negative electrode portion is connected to a negative terminal of another of the two adjacent cells in the length direction of the battery module (as described in lines 172-183 and illustrated in Fig. 5 where negative electrode portion 112 is connected to the negative electrode of one cell that is adjacent in the length direction to the cell in which the positive electrode portion is connected). Yang teaches glue injection holes positioned in the busbar (lines 243-246) but is silent regarding precisely where these holes are. More specifically, Yang does not teach: wherein the positive electrode portion and the negative electrode portion are provided with at least one of glue injection ports communicating with a gap between the two adjacent cells connected by the working portion in series in the length direction of the battery module. Wang also discloses a battery module (see abstract). Wang, like Yang, teaches the inclusion of glue between the cells in order to fix the cells within the module (lines 197-208). Wang teaches that an injection hole (4) is placed in the busbar (both upper 11, lower, 12 along with insulating layer 12) in order to fill the gap between the cylinders with glue (lines 197-208). As such, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to add the injection hole of Wang to the busbar/positive/negative electrode portion of Yang in order to fill the gap between the cylindrical cells with glue for thermal insulation as well as structural integrity. Furthermore, modified Yang does not explicitly teach that the positive/negative electrode portion includes the glue injection hole. However, changing the location of the injection hole would have been an obvious modification to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention. Such a modification is nothing more than a duplication and/or rearrangement of parts (see MPEP §2144.04(VI)(B) and (C)) which would produce entirely predictable results. Modifying the location and/or number of ports to achieve more favorable locations for filling with glue would have been a recognized benefit to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention. PNG media_image1.png 686 831 media_image1.png Greyscale Annotated Fig. 5 Regarding claim 3, Yang further discloses the positive electrode portion and the negative electrode portion are connected by a bending portion; wherein a plane in which the positive electrode portion is located is higher than a plane in which the negative electrode portion is located, and the plane in which the positive electrode portion is located is parallel to the plane in which the negative electrode portion is located (the positive portion and the negative portion are bent relative to each other due to the high difference in the positive electrode “cap” and the negative electrode which is present at the base of the cap, as illustrated in Fig. 2 (21 is the cap of the positive electrode and the negative electrode 22 is at the base of the cap). Regarding claim 4, Yang further discloses two adjacent working portions on a same bus bar are connected by a connecting portion (such as connecting portion 12 which connects working portions); wherein the connecting portion is connected to the positive electrode portion (the connecting portion 12 is connected to the positive electrode portion 111). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 and 5-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The closest prior art, Yang, teaches a battery module that comprises working portions and glue injection ports as claimed. However, Yang does not teach the presence of a glue spill hole along with a weakened hole in the positive electrode portion and the glue injection port located near the negative electrode portion and has a weakened hole on both ends of the glue injection port in the width direction. The prior art neither teaches nor suggests such features and does not provide any motivation to modify Yang to arrive at the claimed composition. Furthermore, regarding claim 5, Yang does not teach the claimed configuration comprising a series bar on top of the connection bar assembly in addition to a positive electrode bar and a negative electrode bar both placed on top of the battery pack. The prior art neither teaches nor suggests these claimed features in addition to the other claimed limitations and the prior art neither teaches nor suggests a motivation to modify Yang to arrive at such configuration. Relevant Prior Art CN114566764A - Discloses a cell connection system that teaches a limiting/weakened hole (411) in a portion of a working portion located between a positive and negative electrode portion (see Fig. 3) to limit current, similar to that of the claimed invention. US 2023/0307804 – Discloses a cylindrical battery cell module that includes injecting a filling material in between the cells, similar to that of the instant claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW J MERKLING whose telephone number is (571)272-9813. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 8am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Basia Ridley can be reached at 571-272-1453. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW J MERKLING/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 27, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683220
ENERGY STORAGE DEVICE FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE AND METHOD FOR COUNTERACTING A FIRE OF AN ENERGY STORAGE DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676307
Lithium Secondary Battery
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671135
STRUCTURAL SENSELINE ASSEMBLY WITH SPLIT INTERCONNECT BOARD FOR BATTERY CELL ARRAY
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665191
ADVANCED MONOLITHIC SULPHUR WAFER-LIKE CATHODE BASED ON HYPER-BRANCHED SUPER-STRUCTURES AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE THEREOF
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655020
GAS REFORMER FOR PRODUCING HYDROGEN
4y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+13.1%)
3y 1m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1268 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month