Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/519,841

LUGGAGE-COMPARTMENT-BOARD SUPPORT STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Nov 27, 2023
Priority
Dec 20, 2022 — JP 2022-203288 +1 more
Examiner
LYNCH, CARLY W
Art Unit
3643
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Subaru Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
49%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 49% of resolved cases
49%
Career Allowance Rate
85 granted / 172 resolved
-2.6% vs TC avg
Strong +49% interview lift
Without
With
+49.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
216
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
91.3%
+51.3% vs TC avg
§102
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§112
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 172 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in Japan on 12/20/2022. It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copy of the JP 2022-203288 application as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement Applicant’s information disclosure statement filed 11/27/2023 has been considered and is included in the file. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitations “a battery case” “a lid”, and “a battery pack” as separate elements of the structure, which is misrepresentative of the disclosed invention. The limitations are unclear since page six of the original specification notes that the battery pack --includes—the battery case, the lid, among other limitations. For examination purposes, the battery case and lid have been read as being included in the battery pack. Claims 2-8 are rejected for being dependent upon a rejected claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tsumura et al. (CN 115195438, machine translation attached). Regarding claim 1, Tsumura et al. discloses a luggage-compartment-board support structure comprising: a battery case in which a battery is accommodated (Fig. 4, (46)); a lid (36) disposed above the battery case (46); a battery pack (33) disposed below a luggage compartment (25); and a luggage compartment board (16) disposed above the battery pack (Fig .10), wherein the lid comprises an opening cover ((64),(37)) having a cavity that is in communication with an interior of the battery case (paragraph [n0056] of the machine translation, (37) covers a cable (71) that is in communication with the interior of the battery case), and wherein the luggage compartment board is supported by at least the opening cover (paragraph [n0071] of the machine translation, Fig. 9, shows that (16) is supported by at least the opening cover that includes (37) and (64)). Regarding claim 2, Tsumura et al. discloses the support structure of claim 1, and discloses wherein the lid (36) comprises a plug cover (63) configured to cover a predetermined plug (through plug opening (67)), and wherein the luggage compartment board is supported by at least the opening cover and the plug cover (Figs. 1, 10). Regarding claim 3, Tsumura et al. discloses the support structure of claim 1, and discloses wherein the opening cover ((64),(37)) comprises a cable cover having a cavity through which a power transmission cable is extended, the power transmission cable being coupled to the battery (Fig. 3, paragraph [n0056] of the machine translation, (37) covers a power transmission cable (71) that is in communication with the interior of the battery case). Regarding claim 4, Tsumura et al. discloses the support structure of claim 2, and discloses wherein the opening cover ((64),(37)) comprises a cable cover having a cavity through which a power transmission cable is extended, the power transmission cable being coupled to the battery (Fig. 3, paragraph [n0056] of the machine translation, (37) covers a power transmission cable (71) that is in communication with the interior of the battery case). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 5-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tsumura et al. (CN 115195438, machine translation attached) in view of Kaneshima et al. (US 2022/0037718). Regarding claim 5, Tsumura et al. discloses the support structure of claim 3, however does not explicitly teach wherein the opening cover includes a harness cover having a cavity through which a harness is extended, the harness being coupled to an electronic device accommodated in the battery case, and wherein the cable cover and the harness cover are permanently affixed to each other. Kaneshima et al., like Tsumura et al., teaches a battery (20), a lid (40) comprising an opening cover (71), an electric device (50), a battery pack (30), and a luggage compartment board (14) within a vehicle (V), and further teaches wherein the opening cover (71) comprises a cable cover having a cavity (711) through which a power transmission cable (91) is extended (Figs. 3, 5, and 7), the power transmission cable being coupled to the battery (20) and wherein the opening cover (71) includes a harness cover having a cavity (711) through which a harness (92) is extended (Figs. 3, 5, and 7), the harness being coupled to an electronic device (50) accommodated in the battery case (Fig. 3), and wherein the cable cover and the harness cover are permanently affixed to each other (Figs. 3, 5, and 7 show that both the cable cover and the harness cover are permanently affixed to each other). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the support structure of Tsumura et al., to include a combined cable cover and harness cover as taught by Kaneshima et al., with a reasonable expectation of success, in order to provide a cover for all electrical components that will extends out from the cover in one location to limit potential unwanted access, acts of connecting and disconnecting the power transmission cable and the harness can be performed without removing the cover, and the structure can be simplified (Kaneshima et al.: paragraphs [0071] and [0074]). Regarding claim 6, Tsumura et al. discloses the support structure of claim 4, however does not explicitly teach wherein the opening cover includes a harness cover having a cavity through which a harness is extended, the harness being coupled to an electronic device accommodated in the battery case, and wherein the cable cover and the harness cover are permanently affixed to each other. Kaneshima et al., like Tsumura et al., teaches a battery (20), a lid (40) comprising an opening cover (71), an electric device (50), a battery pack (30), and a luggage compartment board (14) within a vehicle (V), and further teaches wherein the opening cover (71) comprises a cable cover having a cavity (711) through which a power transmission cable (91) is extended (Figs. 3, 5, and 7), the power transmission cable being coupled to the battery (20) and wherein the opening cover (71) includes a harness cover having a cavity (711) through which a harness (92) is extended (Figs. 3, 5, and 7), the harness being coupled to an electronic device (50) accommodated in the battery case (Fig. 3), and wherein the cable cover and the harness cover are permanently affixed to each other (Figs. 3, 5, and 7 show that both the cable cover and the harness cover are permanently affixed to each other). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the support structure of Tsumura et al., to include a combined cable cover and harness cover as taught by Kaneshima et al., with a reasonable expectation of success, in order to provide a cover for all electrical components that will extends out from the cover in one location to limit potential unwanted access, acts of connecting and disconnecting the power transmission cable and the harness can be performed without removing the cover, and the structure can be simplified (Kaneshima et al.: paragraphs [0071] and [0074]). Regarding claim 7, Tsumura et al. as modified by Kaneshima et al. teaches the support structure of claim 5, and teaches (references to Kaneshima et al.) wherein a direction in which the cable cover (71) extends and a direction in which the harness cover (71) extends cross each other (Fig. 5 shows that the extension of each cover extends cross each other in a blended fashion). Regarding claim 8, Tsumura et al. as modified by Kaneshima et al. teaches the support structure of claim 6, and teaches (references to Kaneshima et al.) wherein a direction in which the cable cover (71) extends and a direction in which the harness cover (71) extends cross each other (Fig. 5 shows that the extension of each cover extends cross each other in a blended fashion). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. Ojeda et al. (US 2013/0037336), Bradley et al. (US 2023/0093574), Nakayama (US 2018/0111486), Hironaga (JP 2021187195), Eishi et al. (JP 6068884), and Christ et al. (EP 2437345) teach compartment-board support structures including opening covers/connections for cables and harnesses. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CARLY W. LYNCH whose telephone number is (571)272-5552. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 8:30am-5:30pm, Eastern Time, alternate Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter M Poon can be reached at 571-272-6891. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CARLY W. LYNCH/Examiner, Art Unit 3643
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 27, 2023
Application Filed
May 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599117
AQUACULTURE-FEEDING / OXYGEN-DISSOLUTION ASSEMBLY FOR OCEAN APPLICATIONS AND METHOD THEREOF
1y 2m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593758
VERTICAL GROWING SYSTEM
1y 6m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12582108
TELESCOPING LURE RETRIEVAL TOOL
2y 10m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12568952
Bait Apparatus For Animal Cage Trap And Method Of Baiting Using The Same
5y 10m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568957
TURKEY DECOY SYSTEM
5y 0m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
49%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+49.3%)
2y 10m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 172 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month