Office Action Predictor
Application No. 18/520,055

VEHICLE-BODY FRONT STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 27, 2023
Examiner
ESQUIVEL, DENISE LYNNE
Art Unit
3612
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Subaru Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

85%
Career Allow Rate
57 granted / 67 resolved
Without
With
+10.6%
Interview Lift
avg trend
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
26 pending
93
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
42.2%
+2.2% vs TC avg
§102
40.3%
+0.3% vs TC avg
§112
16.4%
-23.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§103
9DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This communication is in response to application No. 18/520,055, filed on 11/27/2023. Claim 1 is currently pending and has been examined. Claim 1 has been rejected as follows. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hidefumi (JP 3707707 B2) in view of Jeong et al (US 2023/0339552). Regarding claim 1, Hidefumi discloses a vehicle-body front structure (Fig. 1, [0009]) comprising a toe board (1, Fig. 1) interposed ([0007], lines 1-2) between a vehicle-body front part (frame 2 front engine area, Fig. 1) and a vehicle interior (behind windshield/passenger compartment area, Fig. 1) in a vehicle (Fig. 1) and comprising an upper toe board (11, Fig. 2A/B-3; [0010], lines 1-3) disposed on an upper side of the vehicle and a lower toe board (12, Fig. 2A/B-3; [0010], lines 1-3) disposed on a lower side of the vehicle, the upper toe board (11, Fig. 2A/B-3) and the lower toe board (12, Fig. 2A/B-3) being joined to each other with a vehicle lower-side edge (11 near 2b, Fig. 2B & 3) of the upper toe board (11, Fig. 2B & 3) overlapping ([0010], lines 3-5) a vehicle upper-side edge (12 near 2a, Fig. 2B & 3) of the lower toe board (12, Fig. 2B & 3); main frames (2, Fig. 1) provided on opposite sides of the vehicle-body front part in a vehicle width direction (2, Fig. 1) of the vehicle and extending in a vehicle front-rear direction (2, Fig. 1) of the vehicle; and front pillars (Fig. 1) extending in a vehicle up-down direction of the vehicle on opposite outer sides of the toe board (1, Fig. 1) in the vehicle width direction, wherein the toe board (1, Fig. 2A) has a closed cross section (13, Fig. 2A/B-3) at a position where the upper toe board (11, Fig. 2A/B-3) and the lower toe board (12, Fig. 2A/B-3) are overlapped (12a, Fig. 2A/B-3; [0011]) with each other, the closed cross section (13, Fig. 2A/B-3) having an area larger (13, Fig. 2A) than a cross-sectional area of a welding joint (at left & right flanges 2c, Fig. 2A; [0012], lines 4-10) between one of the main frames (2, Fig. 2A) and the toe board (1, Fig. 2A), protruding (12a, Fig. 2B & 3) in the vehicle front-rear direction, and extending toward the opposite sides (toward 14, Fig. 2A), the closed cross section (13, Fig. 2A) comprises opposite ends in the vehicle width direction being joined to wheelhouse portions (14, Fig. 1 & 2A), and the main frames (2, Fig. 2A/B-3) are joined (2c, Fig. 2A) to the toe board (1, Fig. 2A/B-3) at positions overlapping the closed cross section (13, Fig. 2A/B-3) in a vehicle front view (Fig. 2A) of the vehicle. However, Hidefumi does not expressly disclose the closed cross section opposite ends in the vehicle width direction being joined to the front pillars. Jeong et al teaches a toe board (1, Fig. 1) with a closed cross section (3, Fig. 1) having opposite ends in the vehicle width direction being joined to the vehicle front pillars (19, Fig. 1) in the analogous field of the claimed invention of vehicle body front structures. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the closed cross section by providing attachment to the vehicle pillars as taught by Jeong et al. Doing so would improve strength and rigidity of the vehicle front frame and dash, especially under compressive force from a collision load. Collision performance, durability performance, and noise vibration harshness of the vehicle would be maximized ([0010]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Terada (US 2024/0166272) discloses a toe board panel (3, Fig. 3) with upper (3a) and lower (3b) toe boards having a closed cross section (14) that extends along the vehicle width and is joined to front pillars (5 via 9). Muller et al (US Patent No. 3,321,235) discloses a toe board panel (2, Fig. 1), closed cross section (4), frames (1’, 1’’) and pillars (6). Utsunomiya (US 2010/0140978) discloses a toe board panel (1, Fig. 1) with upper (5) and lower (6) toe boards having a closed cross section (4) and frames (2). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Denise L Esquivel whose telephone number is (703)756-5825. The examiner can normally be reached Monday- Thursday 7:30 am-5:00 pm, alternate Fridays 7:30 am-4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amy Weisberg can be reached at 571-270-5500. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /D.L.E./Examiner, Art Unit 3612 /AMY R WEISBERG/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 27, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 25, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12583406
VEHICLE STRUCTURAL MEMBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576926
PNEUMATIC BLADDER AERODYNAMIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12576699
CABLE DEPLOYABLE ACROSS VEHICLE DOOR OPENING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12565272
REAR PART STRUCTURE OF VEHICLE BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12559189
Motorcycle Canopy
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+10.6%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 67 resolved cases by this examiner