Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/520,217

FLOOR SYSTEM FOR A CABIN OF A VEHICLE WITH FORM-FITTING FLOOR PANEL CONNECTION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 27, 2023
Priority
Nov 30, 2022 — EU 22210551.2
Examiner
WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE
Art Unit
3635
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Airbus Operations GmbH
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
703 granted / 957 resolved
+21.5% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
70 currently pending
Career history
1027
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
42.0%
+2.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
§112
35.0%
-5.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 957 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Claims 1-14 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2, 5-11, 13-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DE102019114147 in view of Heurteux (US 4,296,586). Re claim 1, DE102019114147 discloses a floor system (14) for a cabin (12) of a vehicle (10), comprising: a floor panel (16), a seat rail (20) comprising: a base rail component (28) having a base surface (top of 28) spaced upwardly by (Fig. 5) a vertically extending web (26) from a flange (24); an installation rail component (42) having an installation surface (bottom of 42), the base surface (top of 28) of the base rail component (28) positioned underneath (Fig. 4) the installation surface (bottom of 42) at a distance thereto (Fig. 4); a recess (the space between 42 and 28) between the installation surface (bottom of 42) and the base surface (top of 28) and extending along (Fig. 4) the seat rail (20); and a plurality of connection components (90), wherein the base rail (28) and the installation rail component (42) are separate components (Fig. 5-7) joined by the plurality of connection components (90), wherein the floor panel (16) has a top surface (top of 16), a bottom surface (bottom of 16) and a connection edge (72) extending between (Fig. 4) the top surface (top of 16) and the bottom surface (bottom of 16), wherein the floor panel (16) is supported by (Fig. 4) the base surface (top of 28) of the base rail component (28) within the recess (the space between 28 and 42), wherein the connection edge (72) has a continuously undulating or serrated edge surface (via 92), and wherein the recess (between 42 and 28) comprises an outward-facing lateral receiving surface (40) that is at least partially complementary to (Fig. 7) the edge surface (of 72) of the connection edge (72) to provide a form-fit engagement (Fig. 7) with the floor panel (16), but fails to disclose wherein the seat rail is configured to vertically clamp the floor panel inside the recess between the base surface of the base rail component and the installation rail component by fastening the installation rail component to the base rail component, the installation rail component providing a clamping force to the floor panel such that the floor panel is pressed on the base surface. However, Heurteux discloses wherein the seat rail (Fig. 4, 3A/3B) is configured to vertically clamp (Fig. 1) the floor panel (P) inside the recess (between 3 and 4) between the base surface (top of 4) of the base rail component (4) and the installation rail component (3) by fastening (via 5) the installation rail component (3) to the base rail component (4), the installation rail component (4) providing a clamping force (via 5) to the floor panel (P) such that the floor panel (P) is pressed on (via 5) the base surface (top of 4). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the floor system of DE102019114147 wherein the seat rail is configured to vertically clamp the floor panel inside the recess between the base surface of the base rail component and the installation rail component by fastening the installation rail component to the base rail component, the installation rail component providing a clamping force to the floor panel such that the floor panel is pressed on the base surface as disclosed by Heurteux in order to provide a rigid, immovable, yet releasable connection of the floor panel to the base rail component and to the installation rail component. Re claim 2, DE102019114147 as modified discloses the floor system of claim 1, wherein the floor panel (16) comprises a honeycomb structure (690) enclosed between a top cover (64) and a bottom cover (62), and wherein the connection edge (72) comprises a core filling material (58) reaching into open cells ([0051], [0055] of English Translation) of the honeycomb structure (60) to increase a stability of the connection edge (72). Re claim 5, DE102019114147 as modified discloses the floor system of claim 1, further comprising a sealing component (46) arranged on at least one of the top surface or the bottom surface (bottom of 16) of the floor panel (16) adjacent to (Fig. 4) the connection edge (72). Re claim 6, DE102019114147 as modified discloses the floor system of claim 1, wherein the connection edge (72) comprises a series of cylindrical cutouts or partially spherical cutouts (92) distributed on the connection edge (72) at a distance to each other (Fig. 7) and at least reaching through (via 92) the top surface (top of 16) of the floor panel (16). Re claim 7, DE102019114147 as modified discloses the floor system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of connection components (92) are connected to (Fig. 7) the base rail component (28) and the installation rail component (42) to arrange the base rail component (28) and the installation rail component (42) in a parallel alignment to each other (Fig. 4) and to clamp (Fig. 4) the floor panel (16) in between (Fig. 4). Re claim 8, DE102019114147 as modified discloses the floor system of claim 7 wherein the installation rail component (42) is substantially flat (Fig. 4). Re claim 9, DE102019114147 as modified discloses the floor system of claim 7, wherein the connection edge (72) comprises a series of cylindrical cutouts or partially spherical cutouts (92) distributed on the connection edge (72) at a distance to each other (Fig. 7) and at least reaching through (Fig. 7) the top surface (top of 16) of the floor panel (16), wherein the installation rail component (42) comprises a series of partially spherical indentations (see Fig. 7), and wherein the partially spherical cutouts (92) and the partially spherical indentations (Fig. 7) are correspondingly shaped (Fig. 7). Re claim 10, DE102019114147 as modified discloses the floor system of claim 7, wherein the connection edge (72) comprises a series of cylindrical cutouts or partially spherical cutouts (92) distributed on the connection edge (72) at a distance to each other (Fig. 7) and at least reaching through (Fig. 7) the top surface (top of 16) of the floor panel (16), Heurteux discloses wherein the installation rail component (3A, 3B) comprises a series of through-holes (which receives 5), wherein the connection components (2) have a hollow-cylindrical shape (Fig. 1-4), and wherein the cutouts (DE102019114147; 92) of the connection edge (DE102019114147: 72), the spacing of the through-holes (which receives 5) and the hollow-cylindrical shape (of 2) of the plurality of connection components (2) correspond to each other (Fig. 1), when the plurality of connection components (2) are vertically arranged underneath (Fig. 1) the through-holes (which receives 5). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the floor system of DE102019114147 wherein the installation rail component comprises a series of through-holes, wherein the connection components have a hollow-cylindrical shape, and wherein the cutouts of the connection edge, the spacing of the through-holes and the hollow-cylindrical shape of the plurality of connection components correspond to each other, when the plurality of connection components are vertically arranged underneath the through-holes as disclosed by Heurteux in order to provide a rigid, immovable, yet releasable connection of the floor panel to the base rail component and to the installation rail component. Re claim 11, DE102019114147 as modified discloses the floor system of claim 1, wherein the connection edge (72) and the lateral receiving surface (40) comprise a non-corrosive material ([0051] disclosing foam, [0008] disclosing a polymer). Re claim 13, DE102019114147 as modified discloses a cabin (12) of an aircraft (10), having a floor (via 16) comprising a floor system (Fig. 4) of claim 1 (see above), wherein at least one object (38) is arranged on the floor (via 16) and attached to the seat rail (20). Re claim 14, DE102019114147 as modified discloses an aircraft (10), comprising an aircraft structure (Fig. 1) and a cabin (12) of claim 13 (see above) arranged therein (Fig. 1). Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DE102019114147 in view of Heurteux (US 4,296,586) and Juergens (US 2011/0183104). Re claim 3, DE102019114147 as modified discloses the floor system of claim 2, but fails to disclose wherein the core filling material comprises a plastic material. However, Juergens discloses wherein the core filling material comprises a plastic material ([0018]). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the floor system of DE102019114147 wherein the core filling material comprises a plastic material as disclosed by Juergens in order to increase panel strength ([0018]). Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DE102019114147 in view of Heurteux (US 4,296,586) and Galliot (US 2020/0094970). Re claim 4, DE102019114147 as modified discloses the floor system of claim 1, but fails to disclose wherein the floor panel comprises an edge cap laterally bonded to the floor panel, and wherein the edge cap comprises the connection edge. However, Galliot discloses wherein the floor panel (14a) comprises an edge cap (36) laterally bonded to ([0034]) the floor panel (14a), and wherein the edge cap (36) comprises the connection edge (edge thereof). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the floor system of DE102019114147 wherein the floor panel comprises an edge cap laterally bonded to the floor panel, and wherein the edge cap comprises the connection edge as disclosed by Galliot in order to protect the edge of the floor panel. Claim(s) 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DE102019114147 in view of Heurteux (US 4,296,586) and Gobeil (US 6,086,018). Re claim 12, DE102019114147 as modified discloses the floor system of claim 7, but fails to disclose wherein the installation rail component is made from titanium. However, Gobeil discloses wherein the installation rail component (14) is made from titanium (Col 6 lines 44-46). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the floor system of DE102019114147 w wherein the installation rail component is made from titanium as disclosed by Gobeil in order to utilize a strong, durable, corrosion resistant material. In addition, it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416. See also Ballas Liquidating Co. v. Allied industries of Kansas, Inc. (DC Kans) 205 USPQ 331. Response to Arguments Claim Rejections 35 USC 103: Applicant’s arguments with respect to all claims have been considered but are not persuasive. Applicant argues that the cited and relied upon prior art fails to disclose the am ended language, particularly providing a clamping force to the floor panel. Applicant’s contends that Dannig applies a force to a component other than the floor panel. Danning is no longer relied upon in the above, due to Applicant’s amended language. This amended language necessitated the new grounds of rejection above in view of Heurteux. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KYLE WALRAED-SULLIVAN whose telephone number is (571)272-8838. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30am - 5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Mattei can be reached at (571)270-3238. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. KYLE WALRAED-SULLIVAN Primary Examiner Art Unit 3635 /KYLE J. WALRAED-SULLIVAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3635
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Oct 01, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 17, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 02, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 01, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768188
Method Of Architecture Design and Construction
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12760535
Wall skirting for floor coverings and method of manufacturing a wall skirting
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12731701
PLATFORM AND PLATFORM SYSTEM FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729542
BUILDING SURFACE PRODUCT INCLUDING EMBEDDED FASTENER, BUILDING SURFACE SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729539
VENTILATION BAFFLE SKIRT
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.4%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 957 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month