Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/521,001

POWER SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH SOLDERABLE POWER PAD

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 28, 2023
Priority
Dec 08, 2022 — DE 102022132741.8
Examiner
MOVVA, AMAR
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Infineon Technologies AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
613 granted / 772 resolved
+11.4% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
797
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
71.9%
+31.9% vs TC avg
§102
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
§112
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 772 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention I (claims 1-14) in the reply filed on 2-17-2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-8, 10-11, and 13-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Fuergut (US 2020/0013723). [claim 1] A power semiconductor device (fig. 7), comprising: a semiconductor substrate (1110, fig. 7, [0108]); a signal routing structure (1132, fig. 7, [0211]) disposed above the semiconductor substrate, the signal routing structure comprising a specific metal (e.g. Cu, [0212]); a solderable power pad (1150, fig. 7, which is a source power pad, see fig. 7 which shows contact to source region 1121 [0116]) forming a power terminal of the power semiconductor device (fig. 7), the solderable power pad comprising the specific metal (e.g. Cu, [0134]) ; and an electrically insulating dielectric passivation layer (1140, fig. 7, [0119]) disposed between the solderable power pad and the signal routing structure. [claim 2] The power semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the specific metal is Cu [0134][0212]. [claim 3] The power semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein a cross section of the signal routing structure is partly or fully overlaid by the solderable power pad (fig. 7). [claim 4] The power semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the signal routing structure is a gate or sense signal connection structure (gate line, 1132, fig. 7, [0211]). [claim 5] The power semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the dielectric passivation layer is free of organic dielectric materials (silicon oxide, [0119]). [claim 6] The power semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the dielectric passivation layer comprises silicon nitride and/or silicon oxide (silicon oxide, [0119]) and/or silicon oxi-nitride. [claim 7] The power semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the signal routing structure is made of a layer stack comprising an adhesion layer and/or barrier layer and a layer of the specific metal arranged over the adhesion layer and/or barrier layer (e.g. [0211] allows for layer combinations of TiN and Cu such a stack of a Cu over TiN). [claim 8] The power semiconductor device of claim 7, wherein the adhesion layer and/or barrier layer comprises a layer of TiW and/or Ti and/or W and/or TiN and/or Ta (e.g. [0211] allows for layer combinations of TiN and Cu such a stack of a Cu over TiN). [claim 10] The power semiconductor device of claim 1, further comprising: a bottom insulating dielectric layer (1131, fig. 7, [0116]) disposed between the semiconductor substrate and the signal routing structure, wherein the dielectric passivation layer together with the bottom insulating dielectric layer hermetically enclose an edge section of the signal routing structure (fig. 7). [claim 11] The power semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the solderable power pad has a thickness of 1 to 20 um [0213]. [claim 13] The power semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the power semiconductor device is a vertical device (fig. 7) or a lateral device. [claim 14] The power semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the power semiconductor device is an IGBT, MOSFET [0108], JFET, P-FET, N-FET, AFET, planar gate transistor, field plate trench transistor, or super junction transistor. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fuergut (US 2020/0013723). Fuergut discloses the semiconductor device of claim 7 but does not expressly disclose that the layer of the specific metal has a thickness of 0.2 to 5 um. Nevertheless it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill before the time of filing to have made the layer of the specific metal is 0.2 to 5 um, since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in prior art, discovering the optimum or working ranges involves only routine skill in the art. In re Aller, 105 USPQ 233. It also been held that the normal desire of scientists or artisans to improve upon what is already generally known provides the motivation to determine where in a disclosed set of percentage ranges is the optimum combination of percentages. In re Peterson, 315 F.3d 1325, 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2003). The claimed range is a result-effective variable since the thickness of the specific metal layer affects the amount of space the device takes up. Claim(s) 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fuergut (US 2020/0013723) in view of Cheng (US 2017/0317080). Fuergut discloses the semiconductor device of claim 1 and that insulation 1140 comprising the silicon oxide dielectric passivation layer [0119], may be a multilayer stack layer of different materials with the bottom of the stack including silicon oxide [0119]. Fuergut, however, does not expressly disclose that one of the layer of the stack may be an organic dielectric layer. Cheng discloses a semiconductor device wherein the ILD (72, fig. 13) over the gate electrode (38, fig. 13) and active area (22, fig. 13) is made of a organic dielectric and/or silicon oxide [0060]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the time of filing to made the ILD layer comprise an organic dielectric in order to make them biocompatible (e.g. for medical devices). With this modification Feurgut discloses: [claim 12] The power semiconductor device of claim 1, further comprising: an organic dielectric layer (upon modification) disposed over the dielectric passivation layer, wherein the organic dielectric layer does not significantly undercut the solderable power pad (the power pad would remain the same upon modification). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AMAR MOVVA whose telephone number is (571)272-9009. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julio Maldonado can be reached at 571-272-1864. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AMAR MOVVA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 28, 2023
Application Filed
May 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12685168
LEAK-PROOF HEAT DISSIPATION STRUCTURE OF HIGH THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY MATERIALS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677506
ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT EMITTING DIODE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677483
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A SENSOR DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672293
MEMORY DEVICE ASSEMBLY WITH A LEAKER DEVICE
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12660206
THREE-DIMENSIONAL NON-VOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE WITH FILAMENT CONFINEMENT
4y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+15.3%)
2y 11m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 772 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month