Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/521,136

AIR VENT OF CAR

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 28, 2023
Priority
Dec 14, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0175080
Examiner
FAULKNER, RYAN L
Art Unit
3762
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Nifco Korea Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
218 granted / 323 resolved
-2.5% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
355
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
49.3%
+9.3% vs TC avg
§102
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
§112
30.4%
-9.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 323 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendments The amendments filed on 08/31/2026 have been received, to which the Applicant is thanked. Response to Arguments The arguments have been fully considered, but have not been found to be persuasive. In response to Applicants argument on page 5 regarding Uhlenbusch and the Applicants argument that amended claim 1 requires that the insertion groove be included in the upper horizontal blade, The examiner respectfully responds the Applicants arguments are spurious, as even if the Applicant disagrees with the rejection below establishing the broadest reasonable interpretation of the prior art as to what an element is, the prior art itself identifies element 54 (the insertion groove) as the longitudinal opening 54, or groove; MPEP 2112.01 states “It should be noted that a claim containing a “recitation with respect to the manner in which a claimed apparatus is intended to be employed does not differentiate the claimed apparatus from a prior art apparatus” if the prior art apparatus teaches all the structural limitations of the claim.”, as such, with ¶0048, Lines 8-11 establishing that the insertion portion 52 is accommodated in a corresponding opening of the upper horizontal blade 32, the limitations of “the upper horizontal blade (32, Fig. 3) includes an insertion groove (54, Fig. 3/4, ¶0048, Lines 8-11 – the insertion groove 54 extends in the horizontal direction to facilitate the space for the structure of element 56) extending in the horizontal direction (Fig. 1/3/4), being met, the Applicants argument is overcome. In response to Applicants argument on pages 6-7 regarding Uhlenbusch and the Applicants arguments that Uhlenbusch lacks showing the insertion portion being able to slide in the horizontal direction within the insertion groove, as well as Uhlenbusch does not disclose that the opening 54 would not accommodate the alleged insertion portion (i.e, the bearing 52) and would not allow the alleged insertion portion to slide in the horizontal direction within the opening 54” The examiner respectfully responds the amended limitation first of need only be configured to accommodate the insertion portion 52, to allow the insertion portion to slide in the horizontal direction within the insertion groove, of which the Examiner would first point out that ¶0048, Lines 8-11 established that the insertion portion 52 is accommodated in a corresponding opening of the upper horizontal blade 32, so the limitation that the insertion groove 54 is configured to allow the insertion portion 52 to slide in a horizontal direction within the insertion groove is met by the insertion groove 52 facilitates the horizontal sliding action of the insertion portion in the horizontal direction along the vertical line representing an axis of element 52, further seen by the axial line protruding vertically through the opening of element 52, as when element 50 is pivoted and slides along that picot around the insertion portion 52, the driver follows this movement and causes the lamella 60 to pivot around the axis A, which from Fig. 3 can be seen any pivoting of element 60 about axis A, would constitute the insertion portion being displaced in a horizontal manner to cause elements 60 to pivot about axis A, overcoming the Applicants argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, & 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Uhlenbusch et al (DE102017128105), hereinafter referred to as Uhlenbusch. Regarding claim 1, Uhlenbusch (DE102017128105) shows an air vent of a car, comprising: a horizontal blade (30/32, Fig. 3) installed at a discharge port (20, Fig. 3) of a housing (12, Fig. 1) and including an upper horizontal blade (32, Fig. 3) and a lower horizontal blade (30, Fig. 3); a link (¶0050, Lines 8-10 – connecting rod) having one end coupled to a longitudinal end of the upper horizontal blade and the other end coupled to a longitudinal end of the lower horizontal blade (¶0050, Lines 8-10); a plurality of vertical blades (60, Fig. 2/3) rotatably coupled to the housing (Fig. 1) and arranged at rear of the horizontal blade (Fig. 3); an adjustment knob (50, Fig. 1) coupled to the upper horizontal blade (Fig. 4) so as to be movable in a horizontal direction (¶0042); and a rotation bar (56, Fig. 4) coupled to the adjustment knob (Fig. 4) and connected to the vertical blades (Fig. 4), wherein the adjustment knob includes an insertion portion (52, Fig. 3) protruding vertically (Fig. 3), and wherein the upper horizontal blade (32, Fig. 3) includes an insertion groove (54, Fig. 3/4, ¶0048, Lines 8-11 – the insertion groove 54 extends in the horizontal direction to facilitate the space for the structure of element 56) extending in the horizontal direction (Fig. 1/3/4) and configured to accommodate the insertion portion (Fig. 3) to allow the insertion portion to slide in the horizontal direction within the insertion groove (¶0048, Lines 8-11 – Dictonary.com defines Slide: “to move along in continuous contact with a smooth or slippery surface”; the insertion groove 54 is configured to: accommodate the insertion portion 52, to allow the insertion portion to slide, of which the Examiner is taking the broadest reasonable interpretation of the sliding, or moving along in continuous contact with a smooth surface provided by element 52 , in the horizontal direction within the insertion groove, since the insertion portion 52 is accommodated in a corresponding groove of the upper horizontal blade 32, so the limitation that the insertion groove 54 is configured to allow the insertion portion 52 to slide in a horizontal direction within the insertion groove is met by the insertion groove 54 being configured to allow the insertion portion 52, formed of the upper horizontal blade 32, to horizontally slide along the vertical pivot line, with Uhlenbusch explicitly stating that this movement occurs as “the control element 50 is therefore arranged on the drag plate 32 so as to be pivotable about the bearing 52”, as when element 50 is pivoted around the insertion portion 52, the driver follows this movement and causes the lamella 60 to pivot around the axis A as a resultant action, which from Fig. 3 can be seen any pivoting of element 60 about axis A, would constitute the insertion portion 52 being displaced in a horizontal manner or direction of the insertion groove to cause elements 60 to pivot about axis A). Regarding claim 2, Uhlenbusch shows wherein the insertion groove (54, Fig. 3) is formed at a lower portion of the upper horizontal blade (Fig. 3) and accommodating the insertion portion (¶0048, Lines 8-11). Regarding claim 5, Uhlenbusch shows wherein the upper horizontal blade (32, Fig. 3) includes an upper blade portion (Fig. 3) extending from a front end of the upper horizontal blade to a rear end of the upper horizontal blade (Fig. 3 – the upper horizontal blade 32 includes an upper blade portion, that which extends from a front end of the upper horizontal blade, generally located at in upstream end of element 32, to a rear end of the upper horizontal blade, generally located at a downstream end of element 32), and an upper blocking portion (36, Fig. 3) extending upward from the rear end of the upper blade portion (Fig. 3), and wherein the lower horizontal blade (30, Fig. 3) includes a lower blade portion (Fig. 3) extending from a front end of the lower horizontal blade to a rear end of the lower horizontal blade (Fig. 3 – the lower horizontal blade 30 includes a lower blade portion, that which extends from a front end of the lower horizontal blade, generally located at an upstream end of the lower horizontal blade, to a rear end of the lower horizontal blade, generally located at a downstream end of element 30), and a lower blocking portion (36, Fig. 3) extending downward from the rear end of the lower blade portion (Fig. 3) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3-4 & 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Uhlenbusch et al (DE102017128105), hereinafter referred to as Uhlenbusch, in view of Oh et al (US 2020/0317030), hereinafter referred to as Oh. Regarding claim 3, Uhlenbusch shows element of the claimed invention as stated above in claim 2 including the insertion portion and the upper horizontal blade. However, Uhlenbusch lacks showing wherein the insertion portion includes a locking hook, and the upper horizontal blade includes a locking protrusion to which the locking hook is configured to be locked. Oh (US 2020/0317030), an air vent with a movable handle, is in the same field of endeavor as Uhlenbusch which is an air vent with a movable handle. Oh teaches wherein the insertion portion (see Annotated Figure 1) includes a locking hook (see Annotated Figure 1), and the upper horizontal blade (130, Fig. 2) includes a locking protrusion (see Annotated Figure 1) to which the locking hook is configured to be locked. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the insertion portion and upper horizontal blade of Uhlenbusch to incorporate the teachings of the insertion portion and the upper horizontal blade of Oh, which would provide a decorative element to ensure aesthetic stability by ensuring that the decorative element maintains a stable shape even under vertical air control (¶0008). PNG media_image1.png 336 673 media_image1.png Greyscale Annotated Figure 1 Regarding claim 4, Uhlenbusch shows elements of the claimed invention as stated above in claim 2 including the upper horizontal blade, the insertion portion, and the insertion groove. However, Uhlenbusch lacks showing a vane bracket coupled to the upper horizontal blade and configured to prevent the insertion portion from being separated from the insertion groove. Oh teaches a vane bracket (142/143, Fig. 1) coupled to the upper horizontal blade (Fig. 2/3) and configured to prevent the insertion portion from being separated from the insertion groove (Fig. 3). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the insertion portion and upper horizontal blade of Uhlenbusch to incorporate the teachings of the vane bracket, insertion portion, and the upper horizontal blade of Oh, which would provide a decorative element to ensure aesthetic stability by ensuring that the decorative element maintains a stable shape even under vertical air control (¶0008). Regarding claim 6, Uhlenbusch shows elements of the claimed invention as stated above in claim 2 including the insertion portion and the insertion groove. However, Uhlenbusch lacks showing an elastic body coupled to an accommodation groove that is formed in the insertion portion and is opened upward, wherein the elastic body has an upper surface in contact with a surface defining the insertion groove. Oh teaches an elastic body (145, Fig. 5) coupled to an accommodation groove (see Annotated Figure 1/2) that is formed in the insertion portion (see Annotated Figure 1) and is opened upward (see Annotated Figure 2), wherein the elastic body has an upper surface in contact with a surface defining the insertion groove (see Annotated Figure 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the insertion portion and upper horizontal blade of Uhlenbusch to incorporate the teachings of the accommodation groove, insertion portion, and the upper horizontal blade of Oh, which would provide a decorative element to ensure aesthetic stability by ensuring that the decorative element maintains a stable shape even under vertical air control (¶0008). PNG media_image2.png 302 536 media_image2.png Greyscale Annotated Figure 2 The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure and is provided in the Notice of References Cited. The following prior art teaches related horizontal blade arrangements: US 2023/0025043 – Yang discloses an adjustment knob that moves in a horizontal fashion on a horizontal blade US 5,338,252 – Bowler discloses an adjustment knob for a horizontal slat the moves in a horizontal direction. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RYAN L FAULKNER whose telephone number is (469)295-9209. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9-7, Every other F: Flex. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Hoang can be reached at 571-272-6460. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RYAN L FAULKNER/ Examiner, Art Unit 3762 /AVINASH A SAVANI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3762
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 28, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 07, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Aug 31, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742561
TEMPERATURE CHAMBER AND ENVIRONMENT FORMING DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12728704
AIR VENT WITH ADJUSTABLE AIR OUTLET DIRECTION
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12680702
AIR CONDITIONER
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680747
AIRFLOW METHOD AND AIRFLOW SYSTEM FOR TEMPERATURE CONTROL IN A REFRIGERATION APPLIANCE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12621952
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY RACK AMBIENT TEMPERATURE VISUALIZATION
3y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+17.2%)
3y 3m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 323 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month