Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/521,696

COMPOUNDS, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 28, 2023
Priority
Nov 29, 2022 — provisional 63/428,690
Examiner
ROMERO, KRISTEN WANG
Art Unit
1624
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Chdi Foundation Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
37 granted / 53 resolved
+9.8% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+30.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
89
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
§102
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
§112
39.2%
-0.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 53 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment and Status of the Claims The amendments filed on August 19, 2026 have been entered. Claims 1, 9, 17, 18, 22, 27, 28, and 32 are pending in this application. Claims 2-8, 10-16, 19-21, 23-26, 29-31, and 33-36 have been cancelled. Status of Priority The present application claims the benefits of priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/428,690, filed on November 29, 2022. Withdrawn Rejections/Objections Applicant is notified that any outstanding rejection/objection that is not expressly maintained in this office action has been withdrawn or rendered moot in view of applicant's amendments and/or remarks. Election/Restriction Examiner previously required a restriction of the claimed inventions. The requirement filed on February 12, 2026 was withdrawn in the first non-final rejection (filed May 19, 2026). Specification - Disclosure The specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. ----------------------------------- Added Rejections ----------------------------------- Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112(b) The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 32 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Instant claim 32 recites: “A method for treating Huntington’s Disease comprising administering to a subject in need thereof an effective amount of a compound, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, isotopically enriched analog, stereoisomer, or a mixture of stereoisomers thereof, selected from” the table disclosed in instant claim 32. In the table recited in instant claim 32, compounds 1, 2, 4, 5, 7-10, 18, 20, and 22 are not encompassed by instant claim 1. Furthermore, compounds 1, 2, 4, 5, 7-10, 18, 20, and 22 are explicitly excluded from Formula I as disclosed in para. 0007 of the instant specification (herein, when referring to the instant specification, Examiner is referring to the clean copy filed on 08/19/2026). Even though the instant specification discloses the section, “3. Methods,” starting in para. 0139, the method being claimed (as recited in instant claim 32) is encompassing compounds that was explicitly excluded earlier in the instant specification in para. 0007. In other words, the scope of compounds encompassed by instant claim 32 is broader than the scope of compounds recited in para. 0007 of the instant specification. Moreover, it is unclear how Applicant can claim a method of using certain compounds that were explicitly excluded or not encompassed by the definition of Formula I in para. 0007 of the instant specification. Therefore, the scope of instant claim 32 is unclear and instant claim 32 is rendered indefinite. Conclusion Claims 1, 9, 17, 18, 22, 27, and 28 are allowed. Claim 32 is rejected. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KRISTEN ROMERO whose telephone number is (571)272-6478. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30 AM - 6:00 PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JEFFREY H. MURRAY can be reached at (571) 272-9023. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KRISTEN W ROMERO/Examiner, Art Unit 1624 /JEFFREY H MURRAY/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1624
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 28, 2023
Application Filed
May 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Aug 19, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767650
CRYSTAL FORM OF ENTRECTINIB AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12747229
PYRAZOLYL PYRIMIDINONE COMPOUNDS AND THE USES THEREOF
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747217
PROCESS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF TETRAZOLE DERIVATIVES
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740993
CANNABINOIDS AND USES THEREOF FOR TREATMENT OF ESTROGEN RECEPTOR RELATED DISEASES
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734148
METHOD FOR TREATING DIABETES BY USING ANTRODIA CAMPHORATA COMPOUND
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.8%)
3y 2m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 53 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month