Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/522,017

UNIFIED BEAM INDICATION FRAMEWORK FOR USING MULTIPLE TRANSMISSION-RECEPTION POINTS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 28, 2023
Priority
Aug 05, 2022 — continuation of PCTCN2022110694
Examiner
ZHANG, ZHENSHENG
Art Unit
2474
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
ZTE CORPORATION
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
295 granted / 388 resolved
+18.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
422
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
91.9%
+51.9% vs TC avg
§102
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§112
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 388 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments regarding the 102/103 rejections in the previous office action have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Detailed responses can be found in the new ground of rejections, with underlines. Yuan clearly teaches each and every limitations in the amended claims 21, 25, 31 and 35. The combination Bai and Gao teaches each and every limitations in all the amended claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 21, 23-24, 25, 27-28, 29, 31-32, 33, 35-44 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bai (US 20220132543) in view of Guo (US 20190297603). Regarding claim 21, Bai discloses a method of wireless communication, comprising: receiving, at a wireless device from a network device, an indication of a plurality of beam states ([0070], the base station may inform the UE about the Tx beam(s) it is using by indicating transmission configuration indicator (TCI) state(s) that are associated with the Tx beam(s) to the UE); receiving, at the wireless device from the network device, an association parameter for a downlink (DL) signal or an uplink (UL) signal to select one or more of the plurality of beam states for a communication operation (fig. 5, [0070], the base station may inform the UE indicating transmission configuration indicator (TCI) state(s) that are associated with the Tx beam(s) to the UE. Each TCI state may include information about a downlink reference signal, [0075], the DCI 510 may indicate the beams (e.g., the TCI states) for transmitting the PDSCH), wherein candidate values of the association parameter include a first beam state and a second beam state (fig. 5, [0070][0075], each TCI state may indicate to the UE a Tx beam, the TX beam is active or operative, that the base station is going to use; the DCI 510 may indicate the beams (e.g., the TCI states) for transmitting the PDSCH, here, the beams include at least the first beam and second beam); and performing a communication operation by the wireless device ([0070], the UE may determine that the base station is transmitting physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) or physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) using the same Tx beam as the corresponding downlink reference signal), wherein the communication operation comprises: receiving the DL signal from the network device [0075], the DL signal (DCI 510 ) may indicate the beams (e.g., the TCI states) for transmitting the PDSCH), Bai does not explicitly disclose wherein one or more of the plurality of beam states is used for determining a quasi-colocation (QCL) assumption for the DL signal or the communication operation comprises determining a spatial filter or a power control parameter for the UL signal from the wireless device to the network device according to one or more of the plurality of beam states. Guo discuses receiving the DL signal from the network device, and wherein one or more of the plurality of beam states is used for determining a quasi-colocation (QCL) assumption for the DL signal (Guo, [0206], the UE receives downlink control information (DCI) that includes a beam indication configuration comprising a one bit-field that indicates multiple transmission configuration indicator (TCI) states, the multiple TCI states indicate a quasi-colocation (QCL) configuration for downlink data channels received from the TRPs), or the communication operation comprises determining a spatial filter or a power control parameter for the UL signal from the wireless device to the network device according to one or more of the plurality of beam states (Guo, [0144], resource configured here can provide spatial transmit filter information uplink transmission of PUSCH codeword indicated by DCI.sub.1 and additional one or more DCI(s)). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the time of effective filing to combine the teachings of exchanging beam state information as given by Bai with the teachings of exchanging TCI information given by Guo. The motivation for doing so would have been to provide an efficient beam management in wireless networks. It is noted that the applicant uses selective language in this claim and the examiner is only showing one of the claimed options. Claims 25, 29, 33, 37, 39, 41, 43 are rejected similarly with claim 21 noting that Bai discloses processor and memory (fig.3). Regarding claim 23, 27, 31, 35, Bai and Guo disclose the method of wireless communication of claim 21, wherein the DL signal comprises a physical downlink control channel PDCCH (Guo, [0098], an eNodeB transmits DCI through a physical DL control channel (PDCCH) or an Enhanced PDCCH (EPDCCH)), and wherein the association parameter is configured per control resource set CORESET (Guo, [0170], a number of consecutive symbols is configured by higher layer parameter CORESET) or wherein the DL signal comprises a CSI-RS and the association parameter is configured in a resource set (Guo, [0258]), or wherein the DL signal comprises a shared channel, and wherein the association parameter is indicated by a field in a downlink control information (DCI) that scheduled the shared channel. It is noted that the applicant uses selective language in this claim and the examiner is only showing one of the claimed options. Regarding claim 24, 28, 32, 36, Bai and Guo disclose the method of wireless communication of claim 21, wherein the UL signal comprises a first-type configured-grant PUSCH, and wherein the association parameter is configured in a radio resource control (RRC) parameter, or wherein the UL signal comprises a sounding reference signal (SRS) and wherein the association parameter is configured in a resource set (Guo, [0211]); or wherein the UL signal comprises a physical uplink control channel PUCCH, and wherein the association parameter is configured in a PUCCH resource (Guo, [0193][0371], .report the following information through uplink channel (for example in PUCCH or PUSCH) to the gNB. A UE can be configured with more than one Tx beams for the transmission of PUCCH). It is noted that the applicant uses selective language in this claim and the examiner is only showing one of the claimed options. Regarding claim 38, 40, 42, 44, Bai and Guo disclose the method of claim 37, wherein the candidate values of the association parameter further includes a no beam state (Bai, fig. 11, DCI without TCI state or beam state). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 21, 25, 29, 33 are (alternatively) rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Yuan (US 2025007944). Regarding claim 21, Yuan discloses a method of wireless communication, comprising: receiving, at a wireless device from a network device, an indication of a plurality of beam states ([0122][0216], fig. 19, step 1910, receive a TCI message, a beam can be associated with a TCI state); receiving, at the wireless device from a network device, an association parameter for a downlink (DL) signal or an uplink (UL) signal to select one or more of the plurality of beam states for a communication operation ([0127][0122][0216], fig. 19, step 1910-30, receive a TCI indication, a unified TCI state framework in which a TCI state may be used to indicate more than one beam. The TCI state may be used to indicate beams for a downlink channel or reference signal (RS) and/or an uplink channel or RS; 3GPP standards Release 17 established a unified TCI state framework in which a TCI state may be used to indicate more than one beam. The TCI state may be used to indicate beams for a downlink channel or reference signal (RS) and/or an uplink channel or RS. There may be multiple types of unified TCI states), wherein candidate values of the association parameter include the first beam state and the second beam state ([0127], 3GPP standards Release 17 established a unified TCI state framework in which a TCI state may be used to indicate more than one beam (that includes the first and second beams, at least). The TCI state may be used to indicate beams for a downlink channel or reference signal (RS) and/or an uplink channel or RS. There may be multiple types of unified TCI states); and performing the communication operation by the wireless device (fig. 19, 1950, transmit or receive according to the TCI state), wherein the communication operation comprises: receiving the DL signal from the network device, and wherein one or more of the plurality of beam states is used for determining a quasi-colocation (QCL) assumption for the DL signal ([0122], a TCI state may indicate a directionality or a characteristic of the downlink beam, such as one or more quasi-co-location (QCL) properties of the downlink beam) or determining a spatial filter or a power control parameter for the UL signal from the wireless device to the network device according to one or more of the plurality of beam states ([0122], an uplink beam, such as a UE transmit beam 415 or a BS receive beam 420, may be associated with a spatial relation. A spatial relation may indicate a directionality or a characteristic of the uplink beam). It is noted that the applicant uses selective language in this claim and the examiner is only showing one of the claimed options. Claims 25, 29, 33 are rejected similarly with claim 21 noting that Yuan discloses processors and memory (fig.2). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZHENSHENG ZHANG whose telephone number is (571)270-1985. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 8:00am-6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Thier can be reached at 571-272-2832. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZHENSHENG ZHANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2474
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Jun 20, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 20, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Feb 05, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 12, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 30, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12610429
ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, USER TERMINAL DEVICE FOR RE-PERFORMING EASY SETUP AND CONTROL METHODS THEREOF
2y 9m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12592767
METHODS AND DEVICE FOR PROVIDING SEAMLESS CONNECTIVITY IN A CALL
2y 4m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12574267
DEMODULATION REFERENCE SIGNAL MULTI-SLOT BUNDLING INDICATION
3y 7m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568426
COMMUNICATION METHOD, DEVICE AND SYSTEM OF AMBIENT BACKSCATTERING BASED ON WI-FI SIGNALS
3y 0m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12538374
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SIDELINK COMMUNICATION DURING FAST MCG LINK RECOVERY PROCEDURE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+11.0%)
2y 8m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 388 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month