Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/522,336

DISPLAY MODULES

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Nov 29, 2023
Examiner
LOPEZ CRUZ, DIMARY S
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Wuhan China Star Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
20%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
344 granted / 472 resolved
+4.9% vs TC avg
Minimal -53% lift
Without
With
+-53.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
6 currently pending
Career history
478
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
50.5%
+10.5% vs TC avg
§102
31.1%
-8.9% vs TC avg
§112
13.3%
-26.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 472 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the “second subspace Ab” must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Objections Claims 1 and 4-16 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1 should read: A display module, comprising: a flexible display panel comprising a display portion, a bending portion, and a binding portion, wherein the display portion and the binding portion are connected to each other by the bending portion, and the binding portion is disposed at a rear portion of the display portion; a bearing assembly disposed between the display portion and the binding portion, wherein there is a bending space between the bearing assembly and the bending portion; and a first colloid disposed in the bending space and connected to the bearing assembly and the bending portion; wherein the bending space comprises a first subspace, and the bearing assembly comprises: a first back plate provided at a side of the display portion facing the binding portion; a second back plate provided at a side of the binding portion facing the display portion; a buffer layer provided at a surface of the first back plate away from the display portion; and wherein the first subspace is between a surface of the first back plate facing the bending portion, a surface of the second back plate facing the bending portionthe first colloid is connected to at least one of the first back plate, the second back plate, or the buffer layer. a second colloid, wherein the second colloid is connected to a surface of the second back plate facing the first back plate, and the second colloid is connected to the first colloid . In Claim 5, line 4 should read “the third subspace”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 4, 14 and 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen (CN112071203A) and Oppo (CN110022388). Regarding claim 1, Chen discloses (Fig. 2) a display module, comprising: a flexible display panel comprising a display portion (103), a bending portion (110), and a binding portion (120), wherein the display portion (103) and the binding portion (120) are connected to each other by the bending portion (110), and the binding portion (120) is disposed at a rear portion of the display portion (103); a bearing assembly (101, 109, 102)) disposed between the display portion (103) and the binding portion (120), wherein there is a bending space between the bearing assembly (101, 109, 102) and the bending portion (110); wherein the bending space comprises a first subspace (space at bending space), and the bearing assembly comprises: a first back plate (101) provided at a side of the display portion (103) facing the binding portion (120); a second back plate (102) provided at a side of the binding portion (120) facing the display portion (103); a buffer layer (109) provided at a surface of the first back plate (101) away from the display portion (103); and wherein the first subspace is between a surface of the first back plate (101) facing the bending portion (110), a surface of the second back plate (102) facing the bending portion (110); a second colloid (111), wherein the second colloid (111) is connected to a surface of the second back plate (102) facing the first back plate (101). Chen does not specifically disclose a first colloid disposed in the bending space and connected to the bearing assembly and the bending portion; the first colloid is disposed in the first subspace, and the first colloid is connected to at least one of the first back plate, the second back plate, or the buffer layer; and the second colloid is connected to the first colloid. Oppo teaches a display module (Fig. 2) comprising a first colloid (120) disposed in a bending space and connected to a bearing assembly (131) and a bending portion; the first colloid (120) is disposed in a first subspace, and the first colloid (120) is connected to a second back plate (132). It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to apply the teachings of Oppo and make Chen’s display module with a first colloid disposed in the bending space and connected to the bearing assembly and the bending portion; the first colloid is disposed in the first subspace, and the first colloid is connected to at least one of the first back plate, the second back plate, or the buffer layer; and the second colloid is connected to the first colloid, in order to protect the display module from being damage by force when bended. Regarding claim 4, Chen discloses the display module according to claim 1, wherein the bending space further comprises a second subspace communicating with the first subspace (see annotated fig 2 below); the second subspace is between a surface of the first back plate (101) facing the second back plate (102), a surface of the buffer layer (109) facing the bending portion (110), and the surface of the second back plate (102) facing the first back plate (101), the second colloid (111) is provided in the second subspace, and the second colloid (111) is connected to the surface of the first back plate (111 is connected to 101 through 109) facing the second back plate(102) and the surface of the buffer layer (109) facing the bending portion. PNG media_image1.png 405 696 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 14, Chen discloses the display module (Fig. 2) according to claim 1, further comprising a protective adhesive layer (105) provided on a surface of the bending portion away from the bending space and extending to cover the display portion (103) and the binding portion (120). Regarding claim 16, Chen discloses the display module (Fig. 2) according to claim 1, further comprising: a polarizing plate (104) provided at a side of the display portion of away from the first back plate (101). Chen fails to specifically disclose a cover plate provided at a side of the polarizing plate away from the display portion; and an optical adhesive layer provided between the polarizing plate and the cover plate. Oppo teaches the display module comprising a cover plate (170) provided at a side of a polarizing plate (150) away from the display portion; and an optical adhesive layer (160) provided between the polarizing plate (150) and the cover plate (170). It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to apply the teachings of Oppo and make Chen’s display module with a cover plate provided at a side of the polarizing plate away from the display portion; and an optical adhesive layer provided between the polarizing plate and the cover plate, in order to protect the display portion. Claim(s) 5-8 and 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen, Oppo and further view of HU (CN115775499A). Regarding claim 5, the modified Chen discloses the display module according to claim 1. The modified Chen fails to specifically disclose the bending space further comprises a third subspace communicating with the first subspace; and an edge of a surface of the buffer layer away from the first back plate is provided with a groove as a third subspace, and the second colloid is provided in the groove and connected to a groove wall of the groove. HU teaches a display module wherein a bending space comprises a third subspace communicating with a first subspace (see annotated Fig. 7 below); and an edge of a surface of a buffer layer (22) away from a first back plate (21) is provided with a groove as the third subspace, and a second colloid (25) is provided in the groove and connected to a groove wall of the groove. PNG media_image2.png 339 690 media_image2.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to apply the teachings of HU and make the modified Chen’s display module with the bending space further comprises a third subspace communicating with the first subspace; and an edge of a surface of the buffer layer away from the first back plate is provided with a groove as a third subspace, and the second colloid is provided in the groove and connected to a groove wall of the groove, in order to have a more compact display module. Regarding claim 6, the modified Chen discloses the display module according to claim 5. The modified Chen fails to specifically disclose the second back plate is at least partially received in the groove. However, HU teaches in Fig. 7, the binding portion (12) is at least partially received in the groove. It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to apply the teachings of HU and make the modified Chen’s display module with the second back plate is at least partially received in the groove, in order to have a more compact display module. Regarding claim 7, the modified Chen discloses the display module according to claim 5. The modified Chen fails to specifically disclose a distance between the first back plate and the second back plate is less than a thickness of the buffer layer. However, HU teaches the distance between elements (in the prior art elements 21, 24 and 12) can be reduced by changing the size of the second colloid (251)(see embodiment in fig. 2 and embodiment in fig. 7). It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to apply the teachings of HU and make the modified Chen’s display module with a distance between the first back plate and the second back plate is less than a thickness of the buffer layer, in order to have a more compact display module. Regarding claim 8, the modified Chen discloses the display module according to claim 5, wherein a sidewall of the groove is provided obliquely in a direction away from the bending space (see Hu Fig. 7). Regarding claim 11, Chen discloses the display module according to claim 4, wherein the second colloid (111) is disposed between the first back plate (101) and the second back plate (102). The modified Chen fails to specifically disclose a distance between the first back plate and the second back plate is equal to a thickness of the second colloid. However, HU teaches the distance between elements (in the prior art elements 21, 24 and 12) can be reduced by changing the size of the second colloid (251)(see embodiment in fig. 2 and embodiment in fig. 7). It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to apply the teachings of HU and make the modified Chen’s display module with a distance between the first back plate and the second back plate is equal to a thickness of the second colloid, in order to have a more compact display module. Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen, Oppo and HU, and further in view of Kim et al. (US 10,943,961; hereinafter Kim). Regarding claim 9, the modified Chen discloses the display module according to claim 5. The modified Chen fails to specifically disclose the buffer layer exposes at least a portion of the surface of the first back plate away from the display portion and close to the first subspace. Kim (Fig. 11) teaches a display module wherein a buffer layer (PF1) exposes at least a portion of a surface of a substrate (SUB) away from a substrate portion and close to a first subspace. It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to apply the teachings of Kim and make the modified Chen’s display module with the buffer layer exposes at least a portion of the surface of the first back plate away from the display portion and close to the first subspace, in order to have the first colloid contact the first back plate so that it will better support the bending region. Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen and Oppo, and further in view of Kwon et al. (US 12,382,594; hereinafter Kwon). Regarding claim 10, the modified Chen discloses the display module according to claim 1. The modified Chen fails to specifically disclose an orthographic projection of the second colloid on the first back plate covers an orthographic projection of the second back plate on the buffer layer. Kwon teaches an orthographic projection of a second colloid (400) on a first back plate (210) covers an orthographic projection of a second back plate (220) on a buffer layer (300)(Fig. 2). It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to apply the teachings of Kwon and make the modified Chen’s display module with an orthographic projection of the second colloid on the first back plate covers an orthographic projection of the second back plate on the buffer layer, in order to have better adhesion between all structures. Claim(s) 12-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen and Oppo, and further in view of Kwon et al. (US 2018/0081399; hereinafter Kwon ‘399). Regarding claim 12, the modified Chen discloses the display module according to claim 1. The modified Chen fails to specifically disclose the second colloid and the first colloid are of a same material. Kwon ‘399 teaches a display module wherein the materials of a second colloid (340) may be formed of materials such as PET and the like (see col. 15, lines 35-37) and a first colloid (700) is a resin (see col. 13, lines 3-4) It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to apply the teachings of Kwon ‘399 and make the modified Chen’s display module with the second colloid and the first colloid are of a same material, in order to increase the rigidity of the bending part depending on the design requirements of the display module. Regarding claim 13, the modified Chen discloses the display module according to claim 1. The modified Chen fails to specifically disclose a material of the first colloid has a viscosity of W before being heated and cured, and 20,000 Cp W<60,000Cp. Kwon ‘399 teaches (Figs 4A-4B) a display module wherein a material of a first colloid (700) has a high viscosity (see col 14, lines 43-48). It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to apply the teachings of Kwon ‘399 and make the modified Chen’s display module with the first colloid has a viscosity of W before being heated and cured, and 20,000 Cp W<60,000Cp, in order to ensure the material of the first colloid stays in place without flowing. Claim(s) 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen and Oppo, and further in view of Kwon et al. (US 2014/0217382; hereinafter Kwon ‘382). Regarding claim 15, Chen discloses the display module according to claim 1, further comprising a circuit board (108) and a chip (107), the circuit board and the chip are disposed at and connected to a side of the binding portion away from the display portion. The modified Chen fails to specifically disclose the bending portion is configured to electrically connect a switching control layer in the display portion to the circuit board and the chip. Kwon ‘382 discloses (Fig. 4) a display module comprising a bending portion (BP) configured to electrically connect a switching control layer in a display portion (P1) to the circuit board (470, 460) and the chip (462)(see par. [0049]: “The chip 162 may be a driving device, which can be connected to the circuitry formed on the non-display area of the flexible substrate 110 to supply driving signal to the display unit 120. The circuit board 170 may receive an image signal from another component and supply the signals to the display unit 120 via the circuitry on the insulating film 160 and the non-display area of the flexible substrate 110. The functionality of the chip 162 and the circuit board 170 are not particularly limited, and they may provide various other functionalities, for instance audio, a touch sensing capability on the display area of the flexible OLED display 100, etc). It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to apply the teachings of Kwon ‘382 and make the modified Chen’s display module with the bending portion is configured to electrically connect a switching control layer in the display portion to the circuit board and the chip, in order to minimize the size of display module. Conclusion Applicant's submission of an information disclosure statement under 37 CFR 1.97(c) with the timing fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(p) on January 19, 2026 prompted the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 609.04(b). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DIMARY S LOPEZ CRUZ whose telephone number is (571)270-7893. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrea Wellington can be reached at 571-272-4483. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DIMARY S LOPEZ CRUZ/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 29, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 03, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 26, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12554284
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12554292
RECEPTACLE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12484176
ADJUSTABLE MEMBERS FOR SECURITY BEZELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Patent 12322880
Antenna Structure and Electronic Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 03, 2025
Patent 12062835
Wireless Devices Having Co-Existing Antenna Structures
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 13, 2024
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
20%
With Interview (-53.3%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 472 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month