Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/522,435

Relay Bypass Mechanism

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Nov 29, 2023
Priority
Dec 01, 2022 — provisional 63/429,205
Examiner
HOMZA, LISA NHUNG
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Solaredge Technologies Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
683 granted / 788 resolved
+18.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+1.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
811
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
67.9%
+27.9% vs TC avg
§102
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
§112
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 788 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Czarnecki et al. (US 6,600,122). Regarding claim 1, Czamecki discloses a device comprising: a first terminal (68); a second terminal (80); a contact member (62, 74, 56, 58) having an engagement portion, the contact member (62, 74, 56, 58) being configured to be in a first position and a second position and to form a connection between the first terminal (68) and the second terminal (80) when being either in the first position or in the second position; and a control unit (see col. 6, lines 19-32) configured to facilitate a transition of the contact member (62, 74, 56, 58) and to retain the contact member at the first position or at the second position in the absence of an external force; and a bypass mechanism (10’, 20) comprising: at least a first moveable member (130, 94, 86, 150, 156) having a first surface (130, 150) configured to contact the engagement portion of the contact member (62, 74, 56, 58) at a first angle that is acute relative to an axis that is perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the contact member (62, 74, 56, 58). Regarding claim 2, Czamecki discloses: the first moveable member (130, 94, 86, 150, 156) is configured to move towards the engagement portion of the contact member (56, 62) and to apply force thereto to facilitate its transition from the first position to the second position. Regarding claim 3, Czamecki discloses: the first moveable member (130, 94, 86, 150, 156) is configured to move away from the engagement portion of the contact member (56, 62) when the force is no longer applied to the first moveable member (130, 94, 86, 150, 156). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 5/7/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In the REMARKS: Page 7, last paragraph, applicant argued that: “Czarnecki does not disclose retention of the contact member in either position absent an applied external force. Continuous spring bias is required for its operation”; “Czarnecki does not disclose an additional bypass mechanism”, This argument is not found to be persuasive, because: Czamecki clearly discloses the device with the contact members, which can be in either first or second position. It inherent for the switch to retain the contact member in either position absent an applied external force. Czarnecki clearly discloses the bypass mechanism (10’, 20). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication should be directed to Lisa Homza whose telephone number is (571) 272-3592. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Shawki Ismail can be reached on (571) 272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Lisa Nhung Homza/ Patent Examiner - Art Unit 2837 June 26, 2026 /SHAWKI S ISMAIL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 29, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 02, 2026
Interview Requested
May 07, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12671021
ELECTROMAGNETIC ACTUATOR
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12658393
Relay Static Terminal, Terminal Assembly and Relay
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12640322
RELAY MOVABLE SPRING CAPABLE OF REDUCING TEMPERATURE RISE AND RELAY
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640298
SOLENOID ACTUATOR AND MULTI-SOLENOID ACTUATOR EXERTING CONSTANT FORCE
3y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633482
MOVABLE CONTACT PART AND DIRECT CURRENT RELAY COMPRISING SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+1.3%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 788 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month