Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/523,325

BATTERY AND POWER STORAGE SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 29, 2023
Priority
Nov 30, 2022 — JP 2022-192132
Examiner
MCDANIEL, TYNESE V
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
75%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
213 granted / 366 resolved
-1.8% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
400
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
58.2%
+18.2% vs TC avg
§102
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
§112
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 366 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims This Office Action is in response to the application filed on 11/29/2023. Claims 1-12 are presently pending and are presented for examination. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/29/2023 and 7/29/2024 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hiroe (US 20190225095) in view of Jang (US 20210152079). PNG media_image1.png 624 901 media_image1.png Greyscale As to claim 1, Hiroe discloses a battery (Fig. 1 elements 10,100, and 20), comprising: a first power storage (Fig. 1 12); a second power storage (Fig. 1 11); a positive node configured to connect in parallel a positive terminal of the first power storage and a positive terminal of the second power storage (Fig. 1 above); a negative node configured to connect in parallel a negative terminal of the first power storage and a negative terminal of the second power storage (Fig. 1 above); one of a main contactor (Fig. 1 21), the one being provided at a side opposite to the first power storage and the second power storage with respect to the positive node (Fig. 1 above); a connection circuit configured to connect the negative terminal of the first power storage and the positive terminal of the second power storage (Fig. 1 above); a first switching contactor provided in the connection circuit (Fig. 1 R1); a second switching contactor provided between the positive node and a first connection portion configured to connect the positive terminal of the second power storage and the connection circuit (Fig. 1 R2); a third switching contactor provided between the negative node and a second connection portion configured to connect the negative terminal of the first power storage and the connection circuit (Fig. 1 R3); and a controller configured to control on and off of the main contactor and the first to third switching contactors (Fig. 1 ECU 100), wherein the controller is configured to switch between a first voltage state in which the first switching contactor is in an on state, the second switching contactor and the third switching contactor are in an off state, and the first power storage and the second power storage are connected in series and chargeable at a first voltage (Fig. 3 and [0067] “first state”..between a first state and a second state. The first state is a state where the plural electric power storage bodies are connected in series. The second state is a state where the plural electric power storage bodies are connected in parallel. Chargeable at voltage VB1 [0067][0076] and Fig. 6), and a second voltage state in which the first switching contactor is in an off state, the second switching contactor and the third switching contactor are in an on state, and the first power storage and the second power storage are connected in parallel and chargeable at a second voltage (Fig. 2 and [0057]. Chargeable at voltage VB2 [0067][0076] and Fig. 6). Hiroe does not disclose a control cutoff fuse configured to cut off according to a control signal being provided at a side opposite to the first power storage and the second power storage with respect to the negative node. Jang teaches a control cutoff fuse configured to cut off according to a control signal being provided at a side opposite to the power storage with respect to the negative node (Fig. 4). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify Hiroe battery to include a control cutoff fuse configured to cut off according to a control signal being provided at a side opposite to the first power storage and the second power storage with respect to the negative node in order to protect the circuit from damage due to malfunction of fault. As to claim 2, Hiroe in view of Jang teaches the battery according to claim 1. wherein the controller controls the battery to be in either the first voltage state or the second voltage state ([0038] and Fig. 6 of Hiroe). Hiroe in view of Jang does not teach wherein the controller controls the battery to be in either the first voltage state or the second voltage state in a case where an auxiliary contactor signal is ON. However Hiroe teaches the auxiliary machine load 70 is connected the electric power storage device 10 [0042]. Therefore it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify Hiroe battery to be in either the first voltage state or the second voltage state in a case where an auxiliary contactor signal is ON in order to allow the battery to provide power to the auxiliary devices. Claims 3-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hiroe (US 20190225095) in view of Jang (US 20210152079) in view of Kim (US 20180069411). As to claim 3, Hiroe in view of Jang teaches the battery according to claim 1. Hiroe in view of Jang does not teach wherein the controller turns off the main contactor and cuts off the control cutoff fuse based on occurrence of an impact. Kim teaches wherein the controller turns off the main contactor and cuts off the control cutoff fuse based on occurrence of an impact ([0048] The auxiliary fuse 174 according to the exemplary embodiment of the present invention may be designed to be blown (e.g., be open-circuited) before the main switch 130 is fused after the battery module 110 is short-circuited). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify Hiroe’s controller to turn off the main contactor and cuts off the control cutoff fuse based on occurrence of an impact in order to protect the circuit from damage due to malfunction of fault. As to claim 4, Hiroe in view of Jang teaches the battery according to claim 1. Hiroe in view of Jang does not teach wherein the controller turns off the main contactor and cuts off the control cutoff fuse based on occurrence of a short circuit. Kim teaches wherein the controller turns off the main contactor and cuts off the control cutoff fuse based on occurrence of a short circuit ([0048] The auxiliary fuse 174 according to the exemplary embodiment of the present invention may be designed to be blown (e.g., be open-circuited) before the main switch 130 is fused after the battery module 110 is short-circuited). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify Hiroe’s controller to turn off the main contactor and cuts off the control cutoff fuse based on occurrence of a short circuit in order to protect the circuit from damage due to malfunction of fault. Claims 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hiroe (US 20190225095) in view of Jang (US 20210152079) evident by Wu (US 20180069411). As to claim 5, Hiroe in view of Jang teaches the battery according to claim 1 wherein a second switching contactor is connected in series between the first connection portion and the positive node (Fig. 1 R2), and the third switching contactor is connected in series between the second connection portion and the negative node (Fig. 1 R3) Hiroe in view of Jang does not teach a first fuse is connected in series between the first connection portion and the positive node and a second fuse is connected in series between the second connection portion and the negative node. However, placing a fuse in series with a battery is old and well known (See Wu Fig. 1-2 fuses 40-41 and 50-51). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify Hiroe’s battery to wherein a first fuse is connected in series between the first connection portion and the positive node and a second fuse is connected in series between the second connection portion and the negative node in order to protect the circuit from damage due to malfunction of fault. Claims 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hiroe (US 20190225095) in view of Jang (US 20210152079) in view of Prasad (US 20230286388). As to claim 6, Hiroe in view of Jang teaches the battery according to claim 1. Hiroe in view of Jang does not teach wherein the first switching contactor and a fuse are connected in series in the connection circuit. Prasad teaches wherein the first switching contactor and a fuse are connected in series in the connection circuit (Fig. 2 Fm). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify Hiroe’s battery to wherein the first switching contactor and a fuse are connected in series in the connection circuit in order to protect the circuit from damage due to malfunction of fault. Claims 7-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hiroe (US 20190225095) in view of Jang (US 20210152079) in view of Ishikawa (US 20030146726). As to claim 7, Hiroe in view of Jang teaches the battery according to claim 1. Hiroe further discloses a power storage system (Fig. 1 vehicle 1), comprising: a motor ([0040]-[0041], Fig. 1 motor 50) , the motor being driven by electric power supplied from the battery (Fig. 1 [0040]); an inverter connected on an electric power transmission path between the battery and the motor ([0040] the PCU 40 includes: an inverter); and a DC power supply circuit connected to a connection portion positioned on an electric power transmission path between the inverter and the battery (Fig. 1 DC charging facility 200), Hiroe in view of Jang does not teach a three-phase motor in which coils of three phases are connected at a neutral point, the three-phase motor being driven by electric power supplied from the battery nor teaches wherein the DC power supply circuit has a branch circuit connected to the neutral point at a positive electrode side of the DC power supply circuit. Ishikawa teaches (Fig. 5) a three-phase motor in which coils of three phases are connected at a neutral point (Fig. 5 motors 6,6a), the three-phase motor being driven by electric power supplied from the battery (Fig. 5), wherein the DC power supply circuit (7) has a branch circuit connected to the neutral point at a positive electrode side of the DC power supply circuit (Fig. 5) It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify Hiroe’s battery to include a three-phase motor in which coils of three phases are connected at a neutral point, the three-phase motor being driven by electric power supplied from the battery and wherein the DC power supply circuit has a branch circuit connected to the neutral point at a positive electrode side of the DC power supply circuit in order to enable the battery to be charged and improve efficiency by charging auxiliary components of a vehicle. As to claim 8, Hiroe in view of Jang in view of Ishikawa teaches the power storage system according to claim 7, further comprising: an auxiliary device (Fig. 1 auxiliary machine load 70); and an auxiliary device drive circuit connected on an electric power transmission path between the inverter and the connection portion (Fig. 1) and an auxiliary device drive circuit configured to supply electric power to the auxiliary device ([0042] the auxiliary machine load 70 includes a DC/DC converter that lowers a voltage of the positive electrode line PL and generates an auxiliary machine voltage). Hiroe in view of Jang does not teach the auxiliary device configured to be driven by DC electric power from the battery and an external power supply nor teaches, wherein the auxiliary device is operated at the first voltage. Ishikawa teaches an auxiliary device (Fig. 4, 6) configured to be driven by DC electric power from the battery (1) and an external power supply (8, 0047-0049), wherein the auxiliary device is operated at the first voltage (lower voltage with 7, 0048). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify Hiroe’s auxiliary device to be configured to be driven by DC electric power from the battery and an external power supply, wherein the auxiliary device is operated at the first voltage in order to improve efficiency by charging auxiliary components of a vehicle. As to claim 9, Hiroe in view of Jang in view of Ishikawa teaches the power storage system according to claim 8. Hiroe in view of Jang does not teach wherein when the battery is charged at the second voltage, the controller causes the inverter to boost a voltage supplied from the branch circuit to the three-phase motor to the first voltage. Ishikawa teaches wherein when the battery is charged at the second voltage, the controller causes the inverter to boost a voltage supplied from the branch circuit to the three-phase motor to the first voltage ([0048]). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify Hiroe’s power storage system to wherein when the battery is charged at the second voltage, the controller causes the inverter to boost a voltage supplied from the branch circuit to the three-phase motor to the first voltage in order to improve efficiency by charging auxiliary components of a vehicle. As to claim 10, Hiroe in view of Jang teaches the battery according to claim 1. Hiroe further discloses a power storage system (Fig. 1 vehicle 1), comprising: a motor ([0040]-[0041], Fig. 1 motor 50) , the motor being driven by electric power supplied from the battery (Fig. 1 [0040]); an inverter connected on an electric power transmission path between the battery and the motor ([0040] the PCU 40 includes: an inverter); and a DC power supply circuit connected to a connection portion positioned on an electric power transmission path between the inverter and the battery (Fig. 1 DC charging facility 200), Hiroe in view of Jang does not teach a three-phase motor in which coils of three phases are connected at a neutral point, the three-phase motor being driven by electric power supplied from the battery nor teaches wherein the DC power supply circuit has a branch circuit connected to a coil of one phase among the coils of three phases at a positive electrode side of the DC power supply circuit. Ishikawa teaches (Fig. 4) a three-phase motor in which coils of three phases are connected at a neutral point (Fig. 4 motors 6), the three-phase motor being driven by electric power supplied from the battery (Fig. 4), wherein the DC power supply circuit (7) has a branch circuit connected to a coil of one phase among the coils of three phases at a positive electrode side of the DC power supply circuit (Fig. 4,DC/DC converter connected to the U branch of the motor) . It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify Hiroe’s battery to include a three-phase motor in which coils of three phases are connected at a neutral point, the three-phase motor being driven by electric power supplied from the battery and wherein the DC power supply circuit has a branch circuit connected to a coil of one phase among the coils of three phases at a positive electrode side of the DC power supply circuit in order to improve efficiency by charging auxiliary components of a vehicle As to claim 11, Hiroe in view of Jang in view of Ishikawa teaches the power storage system according to claim 10, further comprising: an auxiliary device (Fig. 1 auxiliary machine load 70); and an auxiliary device drive circuit configured to supply electric power to the auxiliary device ([0042] the auxiliary machine load 70 includes a DC/DC converter that lowers a voltage of the positive electrode line PL and generates an auxiliary machine voltage). Hiroe in view of Jang does not teach the auxiliary device configured to be driven by DC electric power from the battery and an external power supply nor teaches, wherein the auxiliary device is operated at the first voltage. Ishikawa teaches an auxiliary device (Fig. 4, 6) configured to be driven by DC electric power from the battery (1) and an external power supply (8, 0047-0049), wherein the auxiliary device is operated at the first voltage (lower voltage with 7, 0048). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify Hiroe’s auxiliary device to be configured to be driven by DC electric power from the battery and an external power supply, wherein the auxiliary device is operated at the first voltage in order to improve efficiency by charging auxiliary components of a vehicle As to claim 12, Hiroe in view of Jang in view of Ishikawa teaches the power storage system according to claim 11. Hiroe in view of Jang does not teach wherein when the battery is charged at the second voltage, the controller causes the inverter to boost a voltage supplied from the branch circuit to the three-phase motor to the first voltage. Ishikawa teaches wherein when the battery is charged at the second voltage, the controller causes the inverter to boost a voltage supplied from the branch circuit to the three-phase motor to the first voltage ([0048]). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify Hiroe’s power storage system to wherein when the battery is charged at the second voltage, the controller causes the inverter to boost a voltage supplied from the branch circuit to the three-phase motor to the first voltage in order to improve efficiency by charging auxiliary components of a vehicle. Conclusion and Related Art Shin (US 20190315234) is cited for having the DC power supply circuit has a branch circuit connected to a coil of one phase among the coils of three phases at a positive electrode side of the DC power supply circuit. Tritschler (US 10367363) is cited for having a DC power supply circuit connected to a connection portion positioned on an electric power transmission path between the inverter and the battery. Tarkiainen (US 10826408) a DC power supply circuit connected to a connection portion positioned on an electric power transmission path between the inverter and the battery, wherein the DC power supply circuit has a branch circuit connected to the neutral point at a positive electrode side of the DC power supply circuit. Mituta (US 20210257843) is cited for having a first power storage; a second power storage; a positive node configured to connect in parallel a positive terminal of the first power storage and a positive terminal of the second power storage; a negative node configured to connect in parallel a negative terminal of the first power storage and a negative terminal of the second power storage. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TYNESE MCDANIEL whose telephone number is (313)446-6579. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Thursday: 8:00 am - 5 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner' s supervisor, Taelor Kim can be reached at 571-270-7166. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TYNESE V MCDANIEL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 29, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706540
ELECTRIC VEHICLE ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS FOR MITIGATING TRANSIENT LOAD CONDITIONS IN LOW VOLTAGE BUSES
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12689233
Charging Module and Dual-Mode Wireless Charging System
4y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12689367
RELAY DRIVING CIRCUIT AND BATTERY SYSTEM HAVING THE SAME
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12683197
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR WAKE-UP CONTROL OF PARALLEL BATTERY PACKS
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12665442
APPARATUS, SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SCALABLE 3D WIRELESS CHARGING UTILIZING MULTIPLE COILS
4y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
75%
With Interview (+17.0%)
3y 4m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 366 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month