Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/524,237

SEAT ASSEMBLY, CUSHION, AND TOOL AND METHOD OF FORMING

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 30, 2023
Examiner
AKAKPO, DANY E
Art Unit
3672
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Lear Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
457 granted / 523 resolved
+35.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
563
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
42.1%
+2.1% vs TC avg
§102
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
§112
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 523 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 18-19, 21-28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nagase et al. (JP6294140B2). Regarding claim 18, Nagase discloses a vehicle interior component, comprising: a stranded mesh material member (11) comprising a concave/convex surface (surface of 11 contacting 51) and a flexible layer (41, 51) bonded to the concave/convex surface of the stranded mesh material member (fig 41, page 2 of translated doc ). Regarding claim 19, Nagase further discloses the flexible layer and the stranded mesh material member are made of identical materials and/or compatible materials (abstract, page 4 ). Regarding claim 21, Nagase further discloses that the stranded mesh material member is formed by inserting a stranded mesh material blank into a tool assembly (200d) and heating and softening the stranded mesh material blank (product by process, fig 41, abstract). Regarding claim 22, Nagase further discloses that the flexible layer is bonded to the stranded mesh material member based on a fluid circulation operation through the tool assembly (page 1 ). Regarding claim 23, Nagase further discloses that the flexible layer is bonded to the stranded mesh material member based on circulation and drawing of a vacuum on the flexible layer within the tool assembly via the stranded mesh material member (product by process, pages 1-6, fig 41). Regarding claim 24, Nagase further discloses that the flexible layer is bonded to the stranded mesh material member based on a fluid circulation operation which involves a pressurized fluid directed on the flexible layer (fig 41, page 1-6). Regarding claim 25, Nagase further discloses that the flexible layer is bonded with the stranded mesh material member based on heating and softening operation which involves circulation of a heated fluid through the stranded mesh material member (page 1-6, fig 41). Regarding claim 26, Nagase further discloses that the stranded mesh material member is bonded with the flexible layer within a tool assembly (200b) comprising at least one of a concave forming surface and a convex forming surface (surface of 200b, fig 41). Regarding claim 27, Nagase further discloses that the stranded mesh material member is formed between two flexible layers (41, 51) positioned on opposite sides of the stranded mesh material blank (fig 41). Regarding claim 28, Nagase further discloses that the stranded mesh material member comprises a polymeric mesh formed from a plurality of integrated polymeric filaments that are looped and bonded to each other (page 4). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 20 and 29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nagase et al. (JP6294140B2) as applied to claim 18 above, and further in view of Dinkel et al. (US 5902014). Regarding claims 20 and 29, Nagase discloses that that the flexible layer is foam (page 4), but is silent regarding the fact that it is impermeable. Dinkel teaches an impermeable foam layer (22) (col 5 lines 1-22). Dinkel further teaches attaching an upholstery layer (17) to a frame (15) of a seat assembly (11) (fig 3) to provide structural integrity. Before the effective filling date, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of Nagase and Dinkel before him or her, to modify the apparatus/method disclosed by Nagase to include an impermeable foam layer as taught by Dinkel in order to allow effective cooling (col 2 lines 9-19) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANY E AKAKPO whose telephone number is (469)295-9255. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicole Coy can be reached on (571) 272-5405. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANY E AKAKPO/Examiner, Art Unit 3672 1/06/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 30, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601248
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DRILLING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600292
SENSOR AND INDICATOR LIGHT MOUNTING STRUCTURE, AND CARGO HANDLING VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590534
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING PLACEMENT OF A DOWNHOLE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590526
WELLBORE DRILL DEVIATION HANDLING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590527
ROTARY STEERABLE SYSTEM ADVISOR WITH AUTONOMOUS MODE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.0%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 523 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month