Office Action Predictor
Application No. 18/525,069

COMMUNICATIONS BASED ON ENERGY COSTS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 30, 2023
Examiner
YUN, EUGENE
Art Unit
2648
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

85%
Career Allow Rate
841 granted / 985 resolved
Without
With
+2.8%
Interview Lift
avg trend
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
34 pending
1019
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.0%
+9.0% vs TC avg
§102
31.2%
-8.8% vs TC avg
§112
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 21-27, and 29-30 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a(1) as being anticipated by Wang (WO 2023/159434). Referring to Claim 1, Wang teaches an apparatus for wireless communication at a user equipment (UE), comprising: one or more memories; and one or more processors, coupled to the one or more memories (see paragraph 7 which shows a processor and memory), the one or more processors individually or collectively configured to: receive signaling indicating a plurality of energy values associated with communications with a network node, wherein each energy value of the plurality of energy values is associated with a different configuration from a plurality of configurations for the communications with the network node (see 2010 of fig. 2 which shows a plurality of configurations sent to a UE 110-1 and paragraph 49 which shows each configuration sent associated with a different power level or power offset which is represented by a value); and communicate with the network node according to a first configuration of the plurality of configurations that is associated with a first energy value of the plurality of energy values (see 2040 of fig. 2 which shows the step of communicating after determining the configuration to be activated as shown in step 2030). Claim 29 is similar to claim 1. Referring to Claim 24, Wang teaches apparatus for wireless communication at a network node, comprising: one or more memories; and one or more processors, coupled to the one or more memories (see paragraph 7 which shows a processor and memory), the one or more processors individually or collectively configured to: transmit, to a user equipment (UE), signaling indicating a plurality of energy values associated with communications with the network node, wherein each energy value of the plurality of energy values is associated with a different configuration from a plurality of configurations for the communications with the network node (see 2010 of fig. 2 which shows a plurality of configurations sent to a UE 110-1 and paragraph 49 which shows each configuration sent associated with a different power level or power offset which is represented by a value); and communicate with the UE according to a first configuration of the plurality of configurations that is associated with a first energy value of the plurality of energy values (see 2040 of fig. 2 which shows the step of communicating after determining the configuration to be activated as shown in step 2030). Claim 30 is similar to claim 24. Referring to Claims 2 and 25, Wang also teaches each energy value of the plurality of energy values indicating an energy cost at the network node corresponding to one of the plurality of configurations (see paragraph 49 which shows power level, power ratio, and power offset according to each configuration, all of which contribute to energy cost). Referring to Claims 3 and 26, Wang also teaches each configuration from the plurality of configurations comprising a serving beam configuration from a plurality of serving beam configurations, and wherein each energy value of the plurality of energy values is associated with a different serving beam configuration from the plurality of serving beam configurations (see paragraph 33 which shows the network device each configuration in separate beams and paragraph 49 which shows each configuration sent associated with a different power level or power offset which is represented by a value). Referring to Claims 4 and 27, Wang also teaches wherein the plurality of serving beam configurations comprise different synchronization signal block indices or different groups of synchronization signal blocks (see paragraph 33 which shows each beam having its own SSB (synchronization signal block) configuration). Referring to Claim 21, Wang also teaches receiving at least one of a multicast signal, a broadcast signal, or a signal that is dedicated to the UE (see 2010 of fig, 2 which shows the signal sent directly and exclusively to the UE 110-1). Referring to Claim 22, Wang also teaches receive, from the network node and via a medium access control control element or a physical downlink control channel, second signaling indicating an update to one or more of the plurality of energy values (see paragraph 36 which shows the updating of the SSB configuration and paragraph 52 which shows MAC and PHY signaling). Referring to Claim 23, Wang also teaches calculating, according to the plurality of energy values associated with the communications with the network node, an energy efficiency for communications with the network node, wherein communicating with the network node according to the first configuration is in response to calculating the energy efficiency for communications with the network node (see 2040 of fig. 2 which shows the step of communicating after determining the configuration to be activated as shown in step 2030 and paragraph 49 which shows power level, power ratio, and power offset according to each configuration, all of which contribute to energy efficiency). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 5, 6, and 28 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang in view of Zhang et al. (US 2022/0131676). Referring to Claims 5 and 28, Wang does not teach wherein each configuration from the plurality of configurations is associated with a signal quality threshold from a plurality of signal quality thresholds, and wherein each energy value of the plurality of energy values is associated with a different signal quality threshold from the plurality of signal quality thresholds. Zhang teaches wherein each configuration from the plurality of configurations is associated with a signal quality threshold from a plurality of signal quality thresholds, and wherein each energy value of the plurality of energy values is associated with a different signal quality threshold from the plurality of signal quality thresholds (see paragraph 25 which shows comparing all downlink signals quality to a threshold and paragraph 26 which shows the threshold as modifiable). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to provide the teachings of Zhang to the device of Wang in order to maintain the delivery of high quality content between devices. Referring to Claim 6, Zhang also teaches the plurality of signal quality thresholds comprising different reference signal received power thresholds (see paragraph 4 which shows the reference signals and paragraph 25 which shows comparing all downlink signals quality to a threshold). Claim(s) 7-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang in view of Laselva (WO 2023/170613). Referring to Claim 7, Wang does not teach receiving an indication of a condition that is associated with the plurality of energy values, wherein communicating with the network node is in response to the condition being satisfied. Laselva teaches receiving an indication of a condition that is associated with the plurality of energy values, wherein communicating with the network node is in response to the condition being satisfied (see paragraph 4 which shows receiving of a condition for a configuration for a handover). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to provide the teachings of Laselva to the device of Wang in order to maintain the delivery of high quality content between devices. Referring to Claim 8, Laselva also teaches wherein the condition is for a conditional handover, and wherein communicating with the network node comprises performing the conditional handover from another network node to the network node in response to the condition being satisfied (see paragraph 4 which shows receiving of a condition for a configuration for a handover). Referring to Claim 9, Laselva also teaches receiving the signaling from the other network node (see 302 and 304 of fig. 3A which shows the UE receiving signaling from the other nodes). Referring to Claim 10, Laselva also teaches the condition is for a conditional lower layer triggered mobility, and wherein communicating with the network node comprises performing the conditional lower layer triggered mobility from another network node to the network node in response to the condition being satisfied (see paragraph 59 which shows operation in lower frequency layers at the target cell). Referring to Claim 11, Laselva also teaches receive the signaling from the other network node (see 302 and 304 of fig. 3A which shows the UE receiving signaling from the other nodes). Referring to Claim 12, Laselva also teaches wherein the condition is for a cell selection or reselection procedure, and wherein communicating with the network node comprises performing the cell selection or reselection procedure with the network node in response to the condition being satisfied (see paragraph 8 which shows cell selection based on conditional handover configurations). Referring to Claim 13, Laselva also teaches receiving one or more system information blocks comprising an indication of a plurality of second energy values associated with communications with another network node, wherein each second energy value of the plurality of second energy values is associated with a different second configuration from a plurality of second configurations for communications with the other network node, wherein performing the cell selection or reselection procedure with the network node is further in response to a second condition that is associated with the plurality of second energy values not being satisfied (see paragraph 8 which shows cell selection based on conditional handover configurations and further noting that there are more than one handover conditions used in cell selection based on information of all target cells which implies energy values from all target cells). Referring to Claim 14, Laselva also teaches the condition is for reporting measurements associated with the plurality of configurations, and wherein communicating with the network node comprises reporting measurements for one or more configurations of the plurality of configurations in response to the condition being satisfied for each of the one or more configurations (see paragraph 71 which shows the process of adjusting measurements made in the process of selecting a target cell). Referring to Claim 15, Laselva also teaches performing measurements associated with one or more configurations of the plurality of configurations in response to the condition being satisfied for each of the one or more configurations (see paragraph 71 which shows measurements performed in regards to conditions exceeding a threshold). Referring to Claim 16, Laselva also teaches the condition is satisfied based at least in part on the first energy value satisfying a threshold energy value associated with the condition (see paragraph 39 which shows operation dependent on load satisfying a threshold). Referring to Claim 17, Laselva also teaches the condition further associated with one or more additional parameters (see paragraph 57 which shows more parameters in regards to energy saving). Referring to Claim 18, Laselva also teaches the condition is satisfied based at least in part on a decision value satisfying a threshold, and wherein the decision value is indicated by a mapping of the one or more additional parameters and the first energy value to the decision value (see paragraph 66 which measures probability to a threshold in regards to additional parameters such as latency, bitrate, etc.) Referring to Claim 19, Laselva also teaches the condition satisfied based at least in part on a decision value satisfying a threshold, and wherein the decision value is a function of the one or more additional parameters and the first energy value (see paragraph 39 which shows operation dependent on parameters satisfying a threshold). Referring to Claim 20, Laselva also teaches the one or more additional parameters comprise at least one of a signal to noise ratio, a signal to noise plus interference ratio, a reference signal received power, a quality of service type, a beam identifier, a cell identifier, a time of day, or a position or zone identifier (see paragraph 45 which shows SINR as a parameter). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EUGENE YUN whose telephone number is (571)272-7860. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wesley Kim can be reached at 5712727867. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EUGENE YUN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 30, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 12, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 19, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 19, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 31, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12593218
SPECTRUM INQUIRY METHOD AND DEVICE FOR AUTOMATIC FREQUENCY COORDINATION PROTOCOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587234
ONLINE LEARNING OF TRANSMISSION PHASE CONTROL FOR A COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE THAT COMMUNICATES VIA INDUCTIVE COUPLING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587233
METHOD FOR DIGITAL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION THROUGH A BARRIER MADE OF CONDUCTIVE MATERIAL, SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING SUCH COMMUNICATION, AND SYSTEM FOR MONITORING THE LEVEL OF FLUID CONTENT IN METAL CONTAINER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588088
PAIRING A TARGET DEVICE WITH A SOURCE DEVICE AND PAIRING THE TARGET DEVICE WITH A PARTNER DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581244
DATA TRANSMISSION BETWEEN A USER TERMINAL AND ANOTHER APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+2.8%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 985 resolved cases by this examiner