Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/525,414

ANGLED DRIVE TABLE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 30, 2023
Priority
Dec 01, 2022 — provisional 63/385,761
Examiner
LUAN, SCOTT
Art Unit
3792
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Imperative Care Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% of resolved cases
65%
Career Allowance Rate
411 granted / 636 resolved
-5.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
671
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
71.2%
+31.2% vs TC avg
§102
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 636 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Status of Claims The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending. Response to Arguments Applicant argues the prior art of record does not teach “wherein the support surface is positioned between and separates the one or more hub adapters from the corresponding hubs,” as recited in amended claim 1. See Remarks at 5. Applicant’s argument has been fully considered but it is not persuasive. The term “between” is defined as in or into the space that separates two places, people, or objects.1 As shown below, Reis et al. (US 20100175701 A1, 2010-07-15) (hereinafter “Reis”) teaches “wherein the support surface (180) is positioned between and separates the one or more hub adapters (114) from the corresponding hubs (182),” as recited in amended claim 1. This space is indicated by line A-A, as shown below.2 Line A-A also shows how the support surface (180) separates spatially (a portion of) the hub adapter (114) from (a portion of) the corresponding hub (182). PNG media_image1.png 422 715 media_image1.png Greyscale Note further that the term “between,” indicating a three-place relation (i.e., X is between Y and Z), does not say anything more about the relata (e.g., whether Y is connected to or separated from Z). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Reis et al. (US 20100175701 A1, 2010-07-15) (hereinafter “Reis”). Regarding claims 1-20, as discussed above (Response to Arguments incorporated by reference herein), Reis teaches a robotic drive system, comprising: a drive table (comprising, e.g., 180) comprising a support surface oriented at an angle relative to a horizontal plane (e.g., [0011] (disclosing use with robotic system which allows for variable orientation of the drive table)); and one or more hub adapters (comprising, e.g., 114) coupled with the drive table, each of the one or more hub adapters being coupleable with a corresponding hub (comprising, e.g., 182) of one or more hubs, each hub being couplable with an interventional device of one or more interventional devices; wherein the support surface (e.g.,180) is positioned between and separates the one or more hub adapters from the corresponding hubs (e.g., Figs. 9A, 9B, 10A and associated text, esp. [0072]-[0078]) (as recited in claim 1); wherein the support surface is oriented between 20 and 70 degrees from the horizontal plane (as recited in claim 2); wherein the support surface is oriented between 50 and 60 degrees from the horizontal plane (as recited in claim 3);wherein the support surface is oriented 55 degrees from the horizontal plane (as recited in claim 4); wherein the support surface is oriented between 20 and 70 degrees from a vertical plane (as recited in claim 5); wherein the support surface is oriented between 40 and 50 degrees from the vertical plane (as recited in claim 6); wherein the support surface is oriented 35 degrees from the vertical plane (as recited in claim 7); wherein each of the one or more hub adapters is magnetically couplable (e.g., construed as magnets in linear drive; [0076]) with the corresponding hub (as recited in claim 8); wherein the drive table comprises a main body (comprising, e.g., 137) and one or more extendable members (e.g., 139) (as recited in claim 9); wherein the one or more extendable members are configured to transition between a collapsed state and a deployed state (as recited in claim 10); wherein the one or more hubs are configured to move axially along the one or more extendable members (as recited in claim 11); wherein the one or more extendable members comprises a distal extendable member (construed as distal portion of 139) configured to extend distally from the main body (as recited in claim 12); wherein the one or more extendable members comprises a proximal extendable member (construed as proximal portion of 139) configured to extend proximally from the main body (as recited in claim 13); wherein at least a portion of at least one of the one or more hubs is configured to extend laterally and inferiorly relative to an inferior edge of the support surface when the hub is positioned on the support surface (e.g., Figs. 10A-10E) (as recited in claim 14); wherein each of the one or more hub adapters is configured to move axially along the drive table to drive axial movement of the corresponding hub (as recited in claim 15); wherein at least one of the one or more interventional devices is configured to be positioned laterally and inferiorly relative to an inferior edge of the support surface when the hub to which the interventional device is coupled is positioned on the support surface (as recited in claim 16); further comprising a shuttle (e.g., 186) configure to translate axially within the drive table, wherein the one or more hub adapters are coupled to the shuttle (as recited in claim 17); wherein the one or more hub adapters are configured to move axially (170, Fig. 9B) along the shuttle (as recited in claim 18); wherein the one or more hub adapters are positioned within an interior of the drive table (comprising, e.g., 127) (as recited in claim 19); wherein the support surface is a sterile field barrier (192, Fig. 11B; [0079] (as recited in claim 20). Prior Art of Record The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered to be pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Bajo et al. (US 20220096120 A1, 2022-03-31 teaches a drive table actuated by a robotic arm. See, e.g., Fig. 2 and associated text. Simi et al. (US 20210106393 A1, 2021-04-15) teaches one or more hub adapters (comprising, e.g., proximal motorized slide 54, Fig. 10) coupled with the drive table (38, Fig. 9D), each of the one or more hub adapters configured to couple to a corresponding hub (comprising, e.g., distal motorized slide 53, Fig. 10) so that axial movement of the each of the one or more hub adapters drives axial movement of the corresponding hub. See also Figs. 9A, 9B, 9D and associated text. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SCOTT T LUAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1860. The examiner can normally be reached on 9am-5pm, M-F (generally). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gary Jackson, can be reached on 571-272-4697. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Scott Luan, Ph.D. /SCOTT LUAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3792 1 https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/between 2 Rail guides 182 slide along and sit on top of rails 180. See [0074].
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 30, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jan 20, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 05, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12629080
USER INTERFACES FOR HEALTH MONITORING
2y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12629222
ROBOTIC SURGERY DEVICE AND FEEDING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623091
SKIN CARE ASSEMBLY
2y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12611205
SURGICAL INSTRUMENT
2y 9m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12605216
MEDICAL INSTRUMENT WITH ROTARY END EFFECTOR, POSITION SENSOR, AND ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE REDUCTION
2y 1m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (+12.3%)
3y 1m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 636 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month