Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/525,479

AUDIO AMPLIFIER AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 30, 2023
Priority
Feb 06, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0015775 +1 more
Examiner
SHAMIRYAN, NAREH
Art Unit
2843
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
53 granted / 58 resolved
+23.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
73
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
56.9%
+16.9% vs TC avg
§102
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§112
35.8%
-4.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 58 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. KR 10-2023-0015775, filed on 02/26/2023. Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/30/2023 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: Par. 23: “DB modulation” should instead read “BD modulation” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Objections Claims 11 and 18 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 11, line 4: “each of the second and fourth switches is a -type …” should instead read “each of the second and fourth switches is a p-type …” Claim 18, line 2: “DB modulation should instead read “BD modulation” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 18-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and (a)(2) as being anticipated by "A 0.0004% (-108dB) THD+N, 112dB-SNR, 3. 15W fully differential Class-D audio amplifier with Gm noise cancellation and negative output-common-mode injection techniques", 2018 IEEE International Solid - State Circuits Conference - (ISSCC) by Wang et al. Regarding claim 1, Wang teaches an audio amplifier (Fig. 3.5.2 and 3.5.3), comprising: a loop filter (OP1, OP2, “loop filter”) configured to receive a differential input signal pair (Vin, Vip); a pulse-width modulation (PWM) signal generator configured to generate PWM signals, corresponding to the differential input signal pair, based on signals received from the loop filter (PWM & Pre-Driver); a driver configured to generate an output signal pair based on the PWM signals (Output drivers); a feedback circuit configured to feed back the output signal pair to the loop filter (Rfb); and a common mode compensation circuit (Negative Output Common Mode Injection (NOCMI)) configured to compensate for a fluctuation in a common mode voltage of the fed-back output signal pair, wherein the common mode compensation circuit generates a compensation voltage for each of a plurality of levels of the common mode voltage, and provides the generated compensation voltage to the loop filter (Column 2 Paragraph 2). Regarding claim 18, Wang teaches the audio amplifier of claim 1, wherein the audio amplifier is a class D amplifier with DB modulation (Col. 1 par. 3, Col. 2 Par. 2). Regarding claim 19, Wang teaches a method of operating an audio amplifier (Fig. 3.5.2 and 3.5.3), the method comprising: receiving an audio signal through an input terminal (Vin, Vip) of a loop filter of the audio amplifier (OP1, OP2, “loop filter”); generating a pulse-width modulation (PWM) signal corresponding to the audio signal (PWM and Pre-Driver); generating an output signal (Vop, Von)to be output to a speaker, based on the PWM signal; feeding back (Rfb) the output signal to the loop filter; and compensating for a fluctuation in a common mode voltage of the fed-back output signal (NOCMI), wherein compensating for the fluctuation comprises: generating a compensation voltage for each of a plurality of levels of the common mode voltage (Col. 2, Par. 2); and providing the generated compensation voltage to the loop filter (Col. 2, Par. 2). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over "A 0.0004% (-108dB) THD+N, 112dB-SNR, 3. 15W fully differential Class-D audio amplifier with Gm noise cancellation and negative output-common-mode injection techniques", 2018 IEEE International Solid - State Circuits Conference - (ISSCC) by Wang et al. Regarding claim 20, Wang teaches a class D audio amplifier with BD modulation (Col. 1 par. 3, Col. 2 Par. 2), the class D audio amplifier comprising: a loop filter (Fig. 3.5.2 and 3.5.3OP1, OP2, “loop filter”); a pulse-width modulation (PWM) signal generator (PWM and Pre-Driver); a gate driver (Output drivers; while not specified in Wang, gate drivers are well known in the art of class-D audio amplifiers, as shown in fig. 2 of US 2020255516 by Lin et al.); a power driver (Output drivers; while not specified in Wang, gate drivers are well known in the art of class-D audio amplifiers, as shown in fig. 2 of US 2020255516 by Lin et al.); a feedback circuit (Rfb); and a common mode compensation circuit (NOCMI), wherein the common mode compensation circuit comprises a control node (see annotated figure) connected to a first input terminal and a second input terminal of the loop filter, and the common mode compensation circuit is configured to: apply a ground voltage to the control node when both a first output signal and a second output signal of the class D audio amplifier are at a high level (Col. 2 Par. 2); apply a driving voltage to the control node when both the first output signal and the second output signal are at a low level (Col. 2 Par. 2); and apply a mean voltage of the driving voltage and the ground voltage to the control node when one of the first and second output signals is at a high level and the other one of the first and second output signals is at a low level (Col. 2 Par. 2). PNG media_image1.png 602 692 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim(s) 1 and 18-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20220255516 by Lin et al. Regarding claim 1, Lin teaches an audio amplifier (Par. 6 class-D amplifier, while Lin doesn’t specify that this is an audio amplifier, class-D amplifiers are well known for being audio amplifiers, as taught in "A 0.0004% (-108dB) THD+N, 112dB-SNR, 3. 15W fully differential Class-D audio amplifier with Gm noise cancellation and negative output-common-mode injection techniques" by Wang et al.), comprising: a loop filter (Fig. 2 #202) configured to receive a differential input signal pair (Vi1, Vi2); a pulse-width modulation (PWM) signal generator configured to generate PWM signals, corresponding to the differential input signal pair, based on signals received from the loop filter (#204); a driver configured to generate an output signal pair (VOP, VON) based on the PWM signals (#206, #208); a feedback circuit (#208) configured to feed back the output signal pair (VOP, VON) to the loop filter (#202); and a common mode compensation circuit (#212) configured to compensate for a fluctuation in a common mode voltage of the fed-back output signal pair (Par. 22), wherein the common mode compensation circuit generates a compensation voltage for each of a plurality of levels of the common mode voltage, and provides the generated compensation voltage to the loop filter (Par. 22). Regarding claim 18, Lin teaches the audio amplifier of claim 1, wherein the audio amplifier is a class D amplifier with DB modulation (Par. 3-4). Regarding claim 19, Lin teaches a method of operating an audio amplifier (Par. 6 class-D amplifier, while Lin doesn’t specify that this is an audio amplifier, class-D amplifiers are well known for being audio amplifiers, as taught in "A 0.0004% (-108dB) THD+N, 112dB-SNR, 3. 15W fully differential Class-D audio amplifier with Gm noise cancellation and negative output-common-mode injection techniques" by Wang et al.), the method comprising: receiving an audio signal through an input terminal (Fig. 2 In1, In2) of a loop filter (#202) of the audio amplifier; generating a pulse-width modulation (PWM) signal (#204) corresponding to the audio signal; generating an output signal to be output to a speaker (While it’s not specified what load #214 is, class-D amplifiers are well known for being audio amplifiers with a speaker as a load, as taught in "A 0.0004% (-108dB) THD+N, 112dB-SNR, 3. 15W fully differential Class-D audio amplifier with Gm noise cancellation and negative output-common-mode injection techniques" by Wang et al.), based on the PWM signal; feeding back the output signal to the loop filter (#210); and compensating for a fluctuation in a common mode voltage of the fed-back output signal (#212), wherein compensating for the fluctuation comprises: generating a compensation voltage for each of a plurality of levels of the common mode voltage (Par. 22); and providing the generated compensation voltage to the loop filter (Par. 22). Claim(s) 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20220255516 by Lin et al. in view of US 20110169569 by Liu. Regarding claim 20, Lin teaches a class D audio amplifier (Par. 6 class-D amplifier, while Lin doesn’t specify that this is an audio amplifier, class-D amplifiers are well known for being audio amplifiers, as taught in "A 0.0004% (-108dB) THD+N, 112dB-SNR, 3. 15W fully differential Class-D audio amplifier with Gm noise cancellation and negative output-common-mode injection techniques" by Wang et al.) with BD modulation (Par. 3-4), the class D audio amplifier comprising: a loop filter (Fig. 2 #202); a pulse-width modulation (PWM) signal generator (#204); a gate driver (#206); a power driver (#208); a feedback circuit (#208); and a common mode compensation circuit (#212) comprises a control node (ncs) connected to a first input terminal (IN1) and a second input terminal (IN2) of the loop filter (#202), and the common mode compensation circuit is configured to: apply a ground voltage to the control node when both a first output signal and a second output signal of the class D audio amplifier are at a high level (Par. 22); apply a driving voltage to the control node when both the first output signal and the second output signal are at a low level (Par. 22). Lin doesn’t teach to apply a mean voltage of the driving voltage and the ground voltage to the control node when one of the first and second output signals is at a high level and the other one of the first and second output signals is at a low level. However, Liu teaches a class-D amplifier circuit with common mode feedback where the common mode feedback is configured to apply a mean voltage of the driving voltage and the ground voltage to the control node when one of the first and second output signals is at a high level and the other one of the first and second output signals is at a low level (Par. 37; VFCM=(OUTP+OUTN)/2). It would be obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to combine Liu with Lin since both are used in are analogous art and are used in a similar context for common-mode compensation. Liu’s common mode compensation greatly improves the performance of the amplifier circuit (Liu Abstract). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art fails to teach that the common mode compensation circuit generates the compensation voltage based on the PWM signals. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NAREH SHAMIRYAN whose telephone number is (703)756-4616. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 7:00AM-4:00PM PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrea Lindgren-Baltzell can be reached at (571) 272-5918. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NAREH SHAMIRYAN/Examiner, Art Unit 2843 /ANDREA LINDGREN BALTZELL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2843
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 30, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12671373
ADAPTIVE ENVELOPE TRACKING BASED ON DETECTED TRANSMIT SIGNAL BANDWIDTH
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671374
ENVELOPE TRACKING WITH DYNAMICALLY CONFIGURABLE ERROR AMPLIFIER
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665557
SINGLE-ENDED TO DIFFERENTIAL CONVERTER
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12652012
HYBRID DISTRIBUTED DRIVER
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12652005
Amplifier with Improved Power Supply Rejection in Feedback Circuits
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+11.4%)
3y 1m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 58 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month