Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/525,803

TRANSFER ROBOT AND STOCKER SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Nov 30, 2023
Examiner
MCCLAIN, GERALD
Art Unit
3652
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
575 granted / 773 resolved
+22.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
815
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
36.9%
-3.1% vs TC avg
§102
34.7%
-5.3% vs TC avg
§112
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 773 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The amendment filed 2 December 2025 has been entered. Claim Objections Claim 20 is objected to because of the following informalities: the phrase, “the manual port includes a lamp indicating the state of the stocker apparatus” reintroduces the lamp that was amended to be introduced before the phrase above. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 15 is objected to because of the following informalities: the phrase, “the state of the stocker apparatus is one of states, in which the container is loaded in the stocker apparatus” should be - - the state of the stocker apparatus is one of the states, in which the container is loaded in the stocker apparatus - -. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Interpretation The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. This application includes one or more claim limitations that do not use the word “means,” but are nonetheless being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, because the claim limitation(s) uses a generic placeholder that is coupled with functional language without reciting sufficient structure to perform the recited function and the generic placeholder is not preceded by a structural modifier. Such claim limitation(s) is/are: sensing module in Claims 1-9 and 11-20. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Adachi (US 2019/0248581). Claim 1: a stocker apparatus (para. [0039; “not show in the figures”); a transfer robot including a sensing module and a robot arm (12/14/15/etc.); a manual port (4/etc.) including a lamp (combination of LED (lamp) 15b and 27’s) and configured to operate as an interface (FIG. 6-7), which transfers a container (2), between the stocker apparatus and the transfer robot; and a controller in communication with the transfer robot (FIG. 1), wherein the lamp is configured to display a state of the stocker apparatus, the state of the stocker apparatus is one of a first mode, a second mode and a third mode (the modes may be at least three different orientations/modes of the stocker apparatus), the sensing module is configured to sense the lamp, and the controller is configured to determine that the container is transferrable by the robot arm between the manual port of the stocker apparatus and the transfer robot based on a sensing result of the sensing module (at least para. [0103]-[0104] based on at least posture of container 2); Claim 2: wherein the manual port includes the lamp for indicating the state of the stocker apparatus (combination of LED (lamp) 15b and 27’s), and the controller determines that the container is transferrable using the sensing result obtained by the sensing module sensing of the lamp (at least para. [0103]-[0104] based on at least posture of container 2); Claim 3: wherein the sensing module senses an indication of the lamp (at least para. [0103]-[0104]); Claim 4: wherein the controller determines that the container is transferrable depending on an illuminance of light output from the lamp (at least para. [0103]-[0104]; at least color illuminance in para. [0063]-[0065]); Claim 5: wherein the sensing module senses a position of the transfer robot relative to a designated position (at least para. [0103]-[0104]); Claim 6: wherein the sensing module determines a deviation between a designated position and a position of the transfer robot (at least para. [0103]-[0104]); Claim 7: wherein the controller determines that the stocker apparatus is prepared to load or unload the container and determines that the container is present in the manual port (at least para. [0103]-[0104]); Claim 8: wherein the transfer robot loads the container into the stocker apparatus or unloads the container from the stocker apparatus depending on a determination that the container is present in the manual port (at least para. [0103]-[0104]); Claim 9: wherein the determination that the container is transferrable by the robot arm between the manual port of the stocker apparatus and the transfer robot is performed at a predetermined time interval (predetermined positions correspond to predetermined time interval); Claim 10: wherein the sensing module includes a vision sensor (para. [0053]); Claim 11: wherein the manual port includes a first opening and a second opening, the first opening is used to load the container to the stocker apparatus, and the second opening is used to unload the container from the stocker apparatus (different 4a positions in at least FIG. 4); Claim 12: wherein the robot arm is disposed in a frame of the transfer robot, and the robot arm is extendable to outside of the frame (at least between 12a/12c in FIG. 4); Claim 13: wherein a sensing range of the sensing module is at least one of wider than a width of the manual port or greater than a height of the manual port (12 goes up and down past multiple 4a’s); Claim 14: wherein the sensing module senses the lamp, and the controller determines the state of the stocker apparatus based on a result obtained by the sensing of the lamp, and determines that the stocker apparatus is prepared for a transfer of the container (at least para. [0103]-[0104] based on at least posture of container 2); Claim 15: wherein the sensing module senses that the lamp is one of turned on, flashing, or turned off (turned on), and the state of the stocker apparatus is one of states, in which the container is loaded in the stocker apparatus, the container is unloaded from the stocker apparatus, or the stocker apparatus is not available for transfer of the container (at least para. [0103]-[0104]); Claim 16: wherein the sensing module is rotatable on a surface of the transfer robot (via 22); Claim 17: wherein the sensing module is extendable from a surface of the transfer robot (14 extends from 12b via 25; alternatively, 14 may be removed and moved away from 12b); Claim 18: a frame (at least between 12a/12c in FIG. 4); a robot arm disposed in the frame and extendable to outside of the frame; and a lamp sensing module (combination of LED (lamp) 15b and 27’s) configured to output a signal indicative of whether a stocker apparatus is prepared to transfer a container (12/14/15/etc.; at least para. [0103]-[0104] based on at least posture of container 2) based on a sensing result of a lamp of a manual port (at least para. [0103]-[0104] based on at least posture of container 2), wherein the lamp is configured to display a state of the stocker apparatus, and the state of the stocker apparatus is one of a first mode, a second mode and a third mode (the modes may be at least three different orientations/modes of the stocker apparatus); Claim 19: wherein the sensing module senses that the lamp of the stocker apparatus is turned on, flashing, or turned off, or senses a color displayed by the lamp of the stocker apparatus, and senses a position of the transfer robot relative to a designated position (senses a color in para. [0063]-[0065]; at least para. [0103]-[0104] based on at least posture of container 2); Claim 20: a stocker apparatus storing a container (2) in which a plurality of substrates are accommodated (para. [0039]; “not show in the figures”); a transfer robot including a sensing module and a robot arm (12/14/15/etc.); a manual port (4/etc.) including a lamp (combination of LED (lamp) 15b and 27’s) and configured to operate as an interface (FIG. 6-7), which transfers the container, between the stocker apparatus and the transfer robot; and a controller controlling the stocker apparatus and the transfer robot (FIG. 1), wherein the controller communicates with the sensing module to determine a state of the stocker apparatus, the manual port includes a lamp (combination of LED (lamp) 15b and 27’s) indicating the state of the stocker apparatus, the state of the stocker apparatus being one of a first mode, a second mode and a third mode (the modes may be at least three different orientations/modes of the stocker apparatus), the sensing module senses the lamp, and the controller determines that the container is transferrable by the robot arm between the manual port of the stocker apparatus and the transfer robot, based on a sensing result of the sensing module (at least para. [0103]-[0104] based on at least posture of container 2); the robot arm transfers the container between the manual port of the stocker apparatus and the transfer robot depending on the state of the stocker apparatus (at least para. [0103]-[0104] based on at least posture of container 2; para. [0063]-[0065]). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 2 December 2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Re. the claimed modes, the modes may be at least three different orientations/modes of the stocker apparatus. Disclosure from the orig. spec. (at least from pp. 8-10 of the remarks) may not be read into the broadly-claimed modes as claimed to limit the claims thereto. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Gerald McClain whose telephone number is (571)272-7803. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and at gerald.mcclain@uspto.gov (see MPEP 502.03 (II)). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Saul Rodriguez can be reached at (571) 272-7097. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Gerald McClain/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3652
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 30, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Sep 19, 2025
Interview Requested
Oct 16, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 16, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 02, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 29, 2026
Final Rejection — §102
Feb 09, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 10, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 10, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12583691
INDUSTRIAL ROBOT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583019
SUBSTRATE TREATING APPARATUS AND SUBSTRATE TRANSPORTING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12564970
TRANSFER APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12559325
TRANSFER ROBOT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12552051
OBJECT CONVEYING ROBOT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+14.8%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 773 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month