Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/525,893

ELECTROCARDIOGRAPH (ECG) SIGNAL ENHANCEMENT METHOD BASED ON NOVEL GENERATIVE ADVERSARIAL NETWORK (GAN)

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Dec 01, 2023
Priority
Apr 03, 2023 — CN 202310340465.0
Examiner
MALAMUD, DEBORAH LESLIE
Art Unit
3792
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Shandong Computer Science Center (National Supercomputing Center In Jinan)
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
673 granted / 859 resolved
+8.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
901
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
50.2%
+10.2% vs TC avg
§102
42.6%
+2.6% vs TC avg
§112
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 859 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Should applicant desire to obtain the benefit of foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d) prior to declaration of an interference, a certified English translation of the foreign application must be submitted in reply to this action. 37 CFR 41.154(b) and 41.202(e). Failure to provide a certified translation may result in no benefit being accorded for the non-English application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to an abstract idea without significantly more. Step 1 Claims 1-10 are directed to an electrocardiograph (ECG) signal enhancement method (process). Step 2A, Prong One Regarding claim 1, the recited steps are directed to a mathematical concept, such as a mathematical formula or equation. See MPEP § 2106.04(a)(2)(I). The limitation(s) of “a) resampling a collected ECG signal to obtain resampled ECG signal data; b) normalizing the resampled ECG signal data; c) extracting a location of an R-wave of a normalized ECG signal by using a Pan_Tompkin detection algorithm, dividing the normalized ECG signal into heartbeats based on m sampling points before the R-wave and n sampling points after the R-wave to obtain a heartbeat dataset U = {U1, U2, . . . , Ut, . . . , UZ}, wherein Ut represents a tth heartbeat record, t ϵ {1, 2, . . . , Z}, Z represents a quantity of the heartbeats, a length of each heartbeat record is represented by N, and each heartbeat record has 1*N dimensions; d) dividing the heartbeat dataset U into a training set Xtrain, a validation set Xval, and a test set Xtest in a ratio of a:b:c; e) establishing a GAN model comprising a generator network and a discriminator network, and inputting random noise Noisefixed into the generator network of the GAN model in batches to output a synthesized signal set Xg, wherein the random noise Noisefixed has batch*1*N dimensions; f) inputting the training set Xtrain into the discriminator network of the GAN model to obtain an output label Xtraind, and inputting the synthesized signal set Xg into the discriminator network of the GAN model to obtain an output label Xgd; g) training the generator network and the discriminator network by means of a game; and h) inputting the random noise Ng with the batch*1*N dimensions into a trained generator network to obtain an enhanced ECG signal Ug.” is/are a process that, as drafted, covers mathematical formulas or equations. For example, these limitations are nothing more than plugging numbers into an equation and outputting the resultant values. Step 2A, Prong Two The judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application. In particular, claim 1 also recites “a collected ECG signal”, and “inputting the random noise”. The collected ECG signal and inputting amount to nothing more than the pre-solution activity of data gathering and entering into a system. There are no structures provided for implementing the method steps. Merely including instructions to implement an abstract idea without a single structure does not integrate a judicial exception into practical application. Step 2B The claims do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception. As discussed above with respect to integration of the abstract idea into a practical application, the additional elements of data collection and inputting amount to nothing more than mere pre-solution activity of data gathering, which does not amount to an inventive concept. The additional elements recited above are well known in the field of ECG collection. Moreover, simply appending well-understood, routine, conventional activities previously known to the industry, specified at a high level of generality, to the judicial exception, e.g., a claim to an abstract idea requiring no more than a generic computer to perform generic computer functions that are well-understood, routine and conventional activities previously known to the industry, is discussed in Alice Corp., 573 U.S. at 225, 110 USPQ2d at 1984. See MPEP § 2106.05(d). In this case, elements of general computer are being used to implement the abstract idea of performing a mathematical formula or equation. Regarding dependent claims 2-10, the limitations of claim 1 further defines the limitations already indicated as being directed to the abstract idea. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DEBORAH L MALAMUD whose telephone number is (571)272-2106. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 1:00-9:30 Eastern. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Unsu Jung can be reached at (571) 272-8506. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DEBORAH L MALAMUD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3792
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 01, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667295
ECG ANALYSIS OF SIGNALS WITH OFFSETS
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12661112
SURGICAL DEVICE RETRACTING MECHANISM
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661015
TECHNIQUES FOR SCREENING AND MONITORING PATIENTS FOR AORTIC ANEURYSMS
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661199
SURGICAL ROBOT SYSTEM
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653716
METHOD FOR LOCATING VISUAL AXIS FOR LASER ASSISTED OPHTHALMIC PROCEDURE WITHOUT CORNEAL MARKING
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+10.0%)
3y 3m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 859 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month